HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #541  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2008, 11:56 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
The interiors at Shangri-la were never downgraded, and are not of inferior quality. They might not be of your taste but don't spread misinformation.

I don't expect Millennium to make any changes to the interior of their units as they wouldn't want to open themselves up to contract cancellations by the purchasers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #542  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2008, 3:01 AM
crazyjoeda's Avatar
crazyjoeda crazyjoeda is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
That aerial is insane. SEFC will be approaching European densities when it is all built out if the Olympic Village is any indication.
Thats what I thought of when I saw the aerial photo. There should be me more high density low rise buildings in this city. The problems with many of these condos in that they are prohibitably expensive, and that make sense for downtown waterfront properties. However, it would be great if more affordable apartments were built. The costs for low rise buildings is cheaper than high rise and most people would give up expensive designer furnishings for an affordable place they can own and not have to rent. Im just thinking for my self it would be great if there were more 1 bedroom condos for around $200,000, obviously they wouldn't be downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #543  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2008, 6:21 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,487
^with ecodensity I really think that is the way Vancouver is heading. Condos along Main st or Kingsway for example are not going to warrant Millenium Water prices obviously.I agree though that developers have to start building affordable condos with basic finishings in working class neighborhoods. Maybe with the global economic/ real estate slowdown this will finally start to happen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #544  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2008, 6:40 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by raggedy13 View Post
^It would seem that is the way things are heading. I can't wait to check this area out for that reason too. I'm interested in seeing what kind of vibe its more European built form will produce.

I was so dissapointed when I found out that the south shore of false creek was going to be zoned for low rise residential but now I couldnt be happier. Point towers are overplayed and Vancouver needs to experiment with other building forms and the OV is the first step in the right direction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #545  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2008, 6:57 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 18,039
save the downtown core for office towers! (so i am happy that they are building the OV along the south shore of False Creek, that area is perfect for residential)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #546  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2008, 9:05 AM
agrant's Avatar
agrant agrant is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
^with ecodensity I really think that is the way Vancouver is heading. Condos along Main st or Kingsway for example are not going to warrant Millenium Water prices obviously.I agree though that developers have to start building affordable condos with basic finishings in working class neighborhoods. Maybe with the global economic/ real estate slowdown this will finally start to happen.
Even with the most basic of finishings, that would only bring a price down so far. An "affordable" unit would have to be one that is small, in addition to the basic finishings. I.e., a studio for 300 thousand vs a two bedroom for 700 thousand. With finishings, we are talking about thousands of dollars difference rathar than hundreds of thousands.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #547  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2008, 2:46 PM
sacrifice333 sacrifice333 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,460
IIRC, at the end of the Miami real estate booms much of the development shifted from grande towers along South Beach to more affordable digs in outlying areas.

It was a fairly natural transition. That same transition should be quite natural here, especially with the changing of zoning rules in the CBD downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #548  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2008, 8:22 PM
Mike Stewart Realtor's Avatar
Mike Stewart Realtor Mike Stewart Realtor is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 19
This makes sense from another perspective. Lots suitable for large towers are now very rare on the West Side of Downtown Vancouver.

If you look at Vancouver's City Plan from the mid 90's it calls for 4 story development along all major ateries. The Caper's building on the old Plimley Dodge site (I love the Dodge hubcaps in the new buildings decoration!) at 4th & Vine is a prime example.

4 stories in total with the street level as retail and the top 3 as residential. It allows the City to increase density without disrupting neighbourhoods. You see alot of this at Nanaimo & Hastings as well...

Sites for this type of development abound and are relatively inexpensive. These projects will be encouraged by expanded public transit that will come with the coming stimulus packages. Roads and Highways are just to politically incorrect, unlike public transit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #549  
Old Posted Dec 22, 2008, 11:34 PM
Canadian Mind's Avatar
Canadian Mind Canadian Mind is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,907
Why just 4, wouldn't 5 or 6 provide even more density but still not change the neighbourhoods too much?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #550  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2008, 2:39 AM
fever's Avatar
fever fever is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Mind View Post
Why just 4, wouldn't 5 or 6 provide even more density but still not change the neighbourhoods too much?
or 8 or 10. Then there are neighbourhoods that should be changed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #551  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2008, 3:43 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Mind View Post
Why just 4, wouldn't 5 or 6 provide even more density but still not change the neighbourhoods too much?
proabbly to do with the fact that 4 storeys can be wood over that they cannot - but there is some in the industry trying to get the codes changed to allow 6 storey wood construction
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #552  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2008, 3:44 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,431
thats already passed, you can build up to 6 storeys with wood
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #553  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2008, 6:10 AM
raggedy13's Avatar
raggedy13 raggedy13 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,450
A few shots of the site in the snow from today:





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #554  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2008, 6:37 AM
fever's Avatar
fever fever is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,019
Awesome. Did you just move in?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #555  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2008, 6:44 AM
raggedy13's Avatar
raggedy13 raggedy13 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,450
^Ha, I wish. But no, I just got a rare opportunity to get a higher vantage point than usual.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #556  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2008, 4:57 PM
rather_draconian rather_draconian is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 192
Thanks raggedy. I'm interested to see how this development will affect the warehousey neighbourhood just south of it...new Yaletown?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #557  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2008, 5:33 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,153
Quote:
Originally Posted by rather_draconian View Post
Thanks raggedy. I'm interested to see how this development will affect the warehousey neighbourhood just south of it...new Yaletown?
not quite but you have to think that from cambie to main from false creek to broadway will see a lot of "redevelopment" for the next decade or so.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #558  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2008, 7:25 PM
Mike Stewart Realtor's Avatar
Mike Stewart Realtor Mike Stewart Realtor is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 19
Great pix!

Where did you take them from?

I think the City felt that an increase from 1/2 stories to 4 would not change the feel, site lines, amount of light etc. all that much.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #559  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2008, 7:59 PM
deasine deasine is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
taking pictures in the snow? brave brave brave... *shivers*
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #560  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2008, 8:02 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 69,153
those im guessing are from the pedestrian are of cambie bridge... i watched "blade 2" (or was it 3) being filmed in that warehouse area from there once en route to a beerfest at plaza of nations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
   
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:22 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.