HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


View Poll Results: Based on options for Broadway Corridor Study, what is your preferred choice?
BRT: Commercial to UBC 25 6.16%
LRT A: Commercial to UBC OR Commercial via VCC to UBC 31 7.64%
LRT B: Main St. to UBC AND Commercial to UBC 18 4.43%
RRT: Commercial to UBC OR VCC to UBC 283 69.70%
COMBO: RRT to Arbutus/LRT to Main St via Arbutus 39 9.61%
BUS: Enhanced Bus Service for all buses to UBC 10 2.46%
Voters: 406. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #481  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2008, 4:50 PM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,429
As for doing the line in phases, I've heard this discussed before and the argument against was cost. Apparently, overall, it's cheaper to do it all at once.
     
     
  #482  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2008, 5:36 PM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Great post Jared.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
By your logic, we should built the E- and M-Line only to Broadway station and use a shuttle bus to transfer people into and out of downtown?
Well put. That's exactly what people dont' understand right now.
     
     
  #483  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2008, 5:37 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,734
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared View Post
UBC may be at the "edge of the region", but it is still a massive transit hub (#2 in the entire region, despite no rapid transit) and it will only get bigger. Ending the line at Alma would be like ending Expo at Main St/Science World. That last little bit accounts for a huge portion of the trips. It's worth it.
Well put as many others have stated. May I add that it would be like the Canada line with no YVR extension.
     
     
  #484  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2008, 5:51 PM
djh djh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,978
^Yes, all good arguments to do the extension in one go.

On top of that, there's political inertia. The odds are that if one government starts a phased project, if they get ousted at some point in the future, their replacements will either dramatically change, or halt the next phase of the project. Bang goes the phased extension all the way to UBC.
     
     
  #485  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2008, 7:08 PM
Overground's Avatar
Overground Overground is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 904
Let's not forget too, that people besides UBC students in the Metro, transit users or otherwise, may be encouraged to visit facilities/tourist and recreational areas more conveniently by train at UBC, where a bus trip before wasn't enticing. Myself being one of them.
     
     
  #486  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2008, 7:53 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,302
If they bore it all the way that'd be awesome. Except for station pits, no one would ever know that a line was being built. Any idea how much it cost to build the Olympic Village to Waterfront portion of the Canada Line?
     
     
  #487  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2008, 8:28 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
52 out of 63 people or 83% have voted FOR SkyTrain to UBC....nuff said.
     
     
  #488  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2008, 8:40 PM
spitkicker08 spitkicker08 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 28
What about the people that didn't vote for skytrain to ubc. I'm curious what their reasoning is. Please share.
     
     
  #489  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2008, 9:27 PM
CLC CLC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
19,860 passengers, or 45% of the total 99 B-Line load (44,000pass/day) go to/from the UBC. If you think this ratio is low, keep in mind that only 47% of the total skytrain passengers go past Broadway into downtown. By your logic, we should built the E- and M-Line only to Broadway station and use a shuttle bus to transfer people into and out of downtown?

thanks for digging out this stats from translink document, is it 2007 figure? I never believe the myth many of forumers claimed that "majority of 99-b riders are UBC-bound". I've used the "bee-line" from almost day 1 of its operation in late 90s, and it is never the case that the line is used almost exclusively by UBC students. 45% sounds like an accurate figure rather than the jaw-dropping 65%.

I just don't want to take it for granted that an university must be connected by fastest means of rapid transit. A skytrain subway built as far as possible (depends on costs) than connect to rapid bus is still a lot better than "slower-than-bus" LRT. I voted the skytrain-to-alma option because I see it is the minimum requirment for this corridor.
     
     
  #490  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2008, 10:02 PM
Stingray2004's Avatar
Stingray2004 Stingray2004 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: White Rock, BC (Metro Vancouver)
Posts: 3,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by spitkicker08 View Post
What about the people that didn't vote for skytrain to ubc. I'm curious what their reasoning is. Please share.
Hey, I voted for Skytrain to Arbutus... then rapid bus to UBC.

BTW, I don't want to be a party pooper as I also would love to have Skytrain extended all the way out to UBC.

But I'm concerned about the financial side of things... $2.8 billion is a huge chunk of change and might be able to be utlized elsewhere more efficiently. And then ridership levels between Arbutus and UBC also come into play.

It's the financial business case in the medium term that I'm also looking at.
     
     
  #491  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2008, 11:48 PM
Hot Rod's Avatar
Hot Rod Hot Rod is offline
Big City Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle-Vancouver-Osaka-Chongqing-Chicago-OKC
Posts: 1,187
look in the long run.

finance it now, if you have to. It will pay dividends in the long run having a crosstown subway!
     
     
  #492  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2008, 2:07 AM
agrant's Avatar
agrant agrant is offline
Cheers!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Well put as many others have stated. May I add that it would be like the Canada line with no YVR extension.
Or a Canada Line with a branch that ended at Sea Island Centre to be specific.
     
     
  #493  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2008, 2:36 AM
Jared's Avatar
Jared Jared is offline
senior something
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by CLC View Post
don't want to spur any argument. But I think we can't say for sure 65% of B-Line riders are campus-bound, the stats only show that the last stretch before reaching UBC the bus is 65% of top load?
From my observation I would say at least half of b-line rider does not take end-to-end trip (from Broadway all the way to UBC)
You are indeed correct; I simply skimmed through this thread late at night, and didn't fully read into the numbers. My mistake. However, the point I made based on those numbers (only a 50% increase in ridership etc, see prev. post) still stands, as the bus is still 65% full.

One other thing I would like to point out is that an LRT down Broadway would unfortunately miss the Finning lands, which are (eventually!) supposed to develop into a post-secondary type area, and would likely see some good ridership.
     
     
  #494  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2008, 3:06 AM
Jared's Avatar
Jared Jared is offline
senior something
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 4,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by DKaz View Post
If they bore it all the way that'd be awesome. Except for station pits, no one would ever know that a line was being built. Any idea how much it cost to build the Olympic Village to Waterfront portion of the Canada Line?
I don't think the TBMing is nessecarily as beneficial as one might initially imagine it to be, for three major reasons:
1) Obviously, there's the cost issue, TBMing is much more expensive, and that money could be better spent elsewhere.
2) TBM's are generally slower than cut and cover (longer construction time).
3) Then the issue of what street the line will travel under comes into play:
- Broadway has a lot of utilities under it, which means you'd need to tunnel very deep to avoid them. They'll still pose a problem when you dig your station boxes. Additionally, you're digging up 100m of Broadway (80m platforms, plus ventelation etc at each end) every kilometer or so; Broadway will be a traffic nightmare even if you dont cut and cover the tunnels.
- 10th Ave is a much narrower street. When you TBM, you have 2 options, 2 small tunnels, or one big one. If you do two smaller tunnels, they'll need some minimum amount of spacing between them so they dont collapse into each other. I'm not sure if 10th Ave can give this (unless you tunnel under buildings on either side, but I'm not sure about what manner (if any) of compensation you'd need to provide if you did that. Alternately, you can use a single big tunnel, but you'll end up excavating twice the amount of dirt as two smaller tunnels: pi*(2r^2), vs. 2*pi*(r^2), which is of course more expensive.

My prefered option would be what I've outlined below. As far as I can tell, its the cheapest and fastest way to do it without causing major traffic headaches and having major resistance from affected buissness (this time they'll be screaming right from the start, now that they've seen what happened on Cambie).

Anyways, here goes:

- Elevated from VCC-Clark, tunnel portal just before Finning stn.
- Underground station at Finning (as per those renderings someone posted back in the summer)
- TBM, with staiton at Main St and Broadway area, until the West side of Cambie (since I imagine they will need to TBM under the Canada Line, there's definately no space above the Canada Line tunnels). I'm assuming that its cheaper to simply keep the TBM running the extra distance rather than stopping it just West of Main and starting again just East of Cambie. Also, I'm assuming cut + cover under Cambie station is basically impossible, although if it was possible, perhaps they could built the Station right under the existing one rather than off to the West, the knockout panel on the EAST side of the Canada Line station could provide a second access point to the M-Line station.
- Otherwise, station on the West side of Cambie and 10th (to integrate with knockout panel on Broadway-City Hall station).
- Cut and cover a stacked tunnel from Cambie to Alma along 10th Avenue, with stacked stations with the platforms on the North side. Since 10th slopes down towards Broadway, you may be able to get away with less excavation than you'd otherwise need. There's no buissnesses along here, so you shouldnt have any bankruptcies. It will be noisy for residents, but hey, you cant make an omelet without cracking a few eggs.
- TBM from Alma to Blanca (to handle the grades just West of Alma, and protect buinessses along the strip just before Blanca. Not sure how they'd dig the station box at Sasamat though, unless they buy up a block of buissnesses and build it there. Otherwise you'd have a traffic/buissness nightmare anyways, and you might as well switch back to cut and cover after the grades sort themselves out.
- At grade along University Blvd as far as you can take it, before elevating or burying in order to inegrate with transit hub at U Blvd and East Mall.
     
     
  #495  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2008, 6:46 AM
fever's Avatar
fever fever is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,019
^ Sounds about right. There's a bit of a hiccup where 12th turns into 10th around Macdonald. It might also be possible to cut and cover between main and cambie. These are things that a detailed study would uncover, and the decision basically comes down to whatever's cheapest.

I could see this being phased. I am surprised by the loads west of granville. Are these percent of peak load or are these percent of total load? (UBC basically shuts down for 2/3 of the year so it's hard to believe that the figure is total load)
     
     
  #496  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2009, 9:41 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,814
I guess they don't know that at-grade LRT tracks will (1) still create a construction zone in the street with business impacts (like observed in Seattle) and (2) eliminate on-street parking forever.

From the Journal of Commerce:

Quote:
January 7, 2009

West Broadway Merchants Association advocates for at-grade transit design

Jean Sorensen

correspondent

A newly-formed advocacy group, the West Broadway Merchants Association (WBBA), doesn’t want a repeat of Canada Line construction that they claim cost fellow merchants thousands of dollars, if the proposed UBC SkyTrain extension up Broadway goes forward, said spokesperson Donna Dobo.

“We are very much in favor of improving rapid transit,” said Dobo, owner of Just Imagine on West Broadway.

She said many merchants and residents were unhappy with the impact of the Canada Line and would be horrified at cut-and-cover or tunneling projects occurring in the area.

The WBBA is favoring an above surface light rail or tram system that would provide minimal disruption to local merchants.

The WBBA has met with various officials and Dobo’s impression from the discussions is that TransLink has ruled out any kind of elevated solution.

She maintained that tunneling is being favoured, but her group is opposed to the idea.

Boring large holes to drop down a tunneling machine could cause major traffic disruptions for an extended period of time, she said.
     
     
  #497  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2009, 12:10 AM
The_Henry_Man The_Henry_Man is offline
HA
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: St. Cloud, MN/Richmond, BC
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
I guess they don't know that at-grade LRT tracks will (1) still create a construction zone in the street with business impacts (like observed in Seattle) and (2) eliminate on-street parking forever.

From the Journal of Commerce:
Uh Oh, here goes those NIMBYs again. Oh god.....
     
     
  #498  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2009, 12:19 AM
mrjauk mrjauk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 555
That is nuts!

Not only is the woman a NIMBY, she is completely blind to the nature of public transit.

Is there anybody who can give tell me how in the world an at-grade LRT (or Tram) system is any improvement over just adding more buses?

The only thing that makes for the M-Line extension to UBC is a subway through the Broadway corridor.
     
     
  #499  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2009, 12:42 AM
cornholio cornholio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,916
makes me almost want to build a at grade LRT system just to spite her. we would shut down broadway, move all the utilities, tear up the street, and take out two lanes or all the parking. then we can tell her that we wanted to do cut and cover down 10th avenue which would have had virtually no impact what so ever, short term or long term, BUT you and your group nixed that plan so you got what you wished for.
     
     
  #500  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2009, 1:03 AM
agrant's Avatar
agrant agrant is offline
Cheers!
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,869
Yea, yea. I think this is just the WBBA's way of letting people know they're watching. I really doubt the merchants will be the deciding factor on the type of transit, so I'm not concerned. They're thinking about the construction period and not much beyond that. This talk of "boring large holes" for tunneling machines... you gotta wonder if it's just a made up scenario. Nobody really knows how construction would be done until a review of all options has been completed.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:11 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.