HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1701  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 9:03 AM
Unregistered Unregistered is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 78
Why does it state that the C-Cars have yet to be designed when Kuala Lumpur and Beijing already make (or will very soon be making) use of them?
     
     
  #1702  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 10:46 AM
raggedy13's Avatar
raggedy13 raggedy13 is offline
Dérive-r
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 4,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
All future ridership estimates, and countless other stuff.
That's awesome that you managed to score such a huge source of information. I'd love to see future ridership estimates.
     
     
  #1703  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2008, 6:37 AM
The_Henry_Man The_Henry_Man is offline
HA
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: St. Cloud, MN/Richmond, BC
Posts: 873
Just curious. I remember one post here on SSP few days ago saying that Kevin Falcon would announce improvements to transit in Richmond after announcing the UBC/Surrey Skytrain extensions on Thurs. But when I tried to find that piece of news, I couldn't find it anywhere on the web. If someone has a link to that, that'll be great!! Thanks

I hope that's more than the inclusion of 403 into FTN.
     
     
  #1704  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2008, 6:39 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
^Highway 99 Bus HOV Lane/RapidBus Service.. see thread.
     
     
  #1705  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2008, 6:40 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Henry_Man View Post
Just curious. I remember one post here on SSP few days ago saying that Kevin Falcon would announce improvements to transit in Richmond after announcing the UBC/Surrey Skytrain extensions on Thurs. But when I tried to find that piece of news, I couldn't find it anywhere on the web. If someone has a link to that, that'll be great!! Thanks

I hope that's more than the inclusion of 403 into FTN.
Those improvements were the new bus lane on the 99 in Richmond.
     
     
  #1706  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2008, 7:15 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Waterfront Station, pic by me:
     
     
  #1707  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2008, 8:23 PM
flight_from_kamakura's Avatar
flight_from_kamakura flight_from_kamakura is offline
testify
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: san francisco and montreal
Posts: 1,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
I just received a CD full of data on the UBC line. I can't post it because it's hundred of mbs in size. I'll probably need a couple of days to go thru it and I'll post the highlights.

Okay I'm only skimming the pages as there are thousands. Looks like the Evergreen is a done deal and will start very shortly, the UBC Surrey and Expo line expansion will all happen at the same time, the decision on the UBC method will be done Feb 2010, (I'm sure nothing to do with the Olympics) The Surrey study will finish just before that but won't start work until after work has started on the UBC line, The Expo line expansion seems to start before everyone. The terminus at UBC is expected to be in the University Boulevard neighbourhood. They are not set on which technology to use, LRT is still on the table but it appears they are favoring Skytrain due to integration. No path is set yet but the study area only covers 500m from Broadway st in each direction (no surprises there). What is interesting is that they expect the UBC line to take into affect the COVs streetcar line which includes Phase 1-3 plus a streetcar along Arbutus and another loop that heads to the False Creek Flats.

Here's a following paragraph that I just cut and pasted from one of the documents.

"SkyTrain currently operates with a mix of 150 Mark I cars and 60 larger Mark II
cars. By the end of 2010, the Mark II fleet will number 108 cars, and possibly 132
cars. Additional fleet will be required to support the Evergreen Line in 2014 and to
accommodate future system expansion and ridership growth. To reach the
maximum capacity of the line, a 3-car Mark II unit will also need to be developed to
allow 5-car trains, the maximum that can be accommodated with existing platforms.
The Mark I cars will likely need to be retired 2020-2025
."

(Cars)Capacity
4-Mark-I 144 (Seat only) 300 (Seat & Stand)
6-Mark-I 216 (Seat only) 450 (Seat & Stand)
2-Mark-II 84 (Seat only) 238 (Seat & Stand)
3-Mark-II 126 (Seat only) 357 (Seat & Stand)
4-Mark-II 168 (Seat only) 476 (Seat & Stand)
5-Mark-II 210 (Seat only) 595 (Seat & Stand)
6-Mark-II 252 (Seat only) 714 (Seat & Stand)

In principle, the SkyTrain system, with its 80 metre platforms, could accommodate a 5-car Mark II train,
made up of existing 2-car units (34.2 m.) coupled with yet-to-be-designed 3-car units (50.9 m.,
incorporating a 16.7 m. centre car). While the resulting 85.1 metre train would overhand the platforms,
the doors would fit within 78 metres, leaving a small, but potentially manageable margin of 1 metre at
each end. Assuming a comparable 130 passengers in the centre section of the 3-car triplet, a 5-car train
could carry 650 passengers under the currently applied loading standards

Peak capacity
Regardless of the length of the SkyTrain line, or the distribution of capacity between various segments, peak capacity in the
peak link will be governed by achieveable headway, and the length and type of train. The accompanying table shows the
headways required to achieve a range of capacities, with different fleet types, based on current loading standards.
Thus, 25,000 passengers per hour would be unachievable with an all-Mark I fleet (in any event, SkyTrain does not have
enough Mark I cars to achieve the higher range), but is within range of a 4-car Mark II fleet, albeit under exceptional
operating demands. (A mixed Mark I and Mark II fleet would be proportionately in between.)
The 5-car Mark II option (subject to technical practicability) should be able to reach 25,000 with some margin, and potentially achieve a rate of 30,000 per hour, perhaps for short duration. (This is calculated with 78sec headways note 72sec headways are possible)


There is just way too much info for me to go thru it all, if someone has the time I can burn them a cd, just pm me. There is some really good info such as separated operating costs for each translink division. All future ridership estimates, and countless other stuff.
thought i'd get this one the new page here. seriously j-lo, you kick ass.
     
     
  #1708  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2008, 12:45 AM
fever's Avatar
fever fever is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,019
They've pulled out all the rail west from the Canada line 2nd Avenue site. This is where it ends (as of this afternoon)


(the streetcar thread's locked)
     
     
  #1709  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2008, 1:33 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Not anymore... =)
     
     
  #1710  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2008, 1:56 AM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
I just received a CD full of data on the UBC line. I can't post it because it's hundred of mbs in size. I'll probably need a couple of days to go thru it and I'll post the highlights.
Are some of the documents in the CD the same as the ones posted here, here, and here?
     
     
  #1711  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2008, 2:08 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
Yes that would be them, glad they released the reference documents along with the RFPs. There's an additional link

here
     
     
  #1712  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2008, 2:26 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Information overload.
     
     
  #1713  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2008, 3:21 AM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,428
I found this to be interesting from the links posted above, specifically http://www.translink.bc.ca/files/procure...d_Transit_Model_Phase_A_Final_Report.pdf

It's a comparison of ridership on the various lines, 2010 and 2021.





The Canada Line looks to be relatively busy. Building the M-line first once again seems like a rather strange decision, politics and linkage to future Evergreen Line aside.
     
     
  #1714  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2008, 3:37 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
The Canada Line will have more than double of the M-Line?? Yet, the Canada Line is built much smaller. -_-

But it does appear that the M-Line does not include the extension to UBC nor the Evergreen Line as SkyTrain as a seamless train ride from the M-Line.
     
     
  #1715  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2008, 3:41 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,093
the m line is pretty dead

sometimes when i leave work at 11 pm i am the only one on it from brentwood to lougheed - that is when i do use it to commute

other times there may only be 1 other person in the same part as me and the stations are empty - only brentwood, production way/university and lougheed seem to have people
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #1716  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2008, 3:48 AM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x2 View Post
The Canada Line will have more than double of the M-Line?? Yet, the Canada Line is built much smaller. -_-

But it does appear that the M-Line does not include the extension to UBC nor the Evergreen Line as SkyTrain as a seamless train ride from the M-Line.
This document is an updated version to treat Evergreen line as skytrain.

I guess these documents answered some of the questions we had in this forum. For instance, the weekday boarding for skytrain is 245,000 in 2006.
     
     
  #1717  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2008, 4:29 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
I don't like this Millennium Line Shuttle business... sounds stupid to me. I would prefer Double Coordinated, if not, at least Split Trail.
     
     
  #1718  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2008, 10:01 AM
zivan56 zivan56 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,207
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
the m line is pretty dead

sometimes when i leave work at 11 pm i am the only one on it from brentwood to lougheed - that is when i do use it to commute

other times there may only be 1 other person in the same part as me and the stations are empty - only brentwood, production way/university and lougheed seem to have people
Funny, when I take it...it is usually 101% full in one of the directions (Westbound in the morning, Eastbound in the Evening). Thankfully, I always go against the flow of rush hour traffic. I had to travel Westbound from Burnaby to Vancouver one morning, and I couldn't even find a place to hold on to when I finally managed to cram myself into the car.
     
     
  #1719  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2008, 10:59 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,093
i never take it during peak times

even the expo line late at night is busier than the M line

so that stat mr x posted isn't surprising that the canada line will be so busy compared to the m line
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #1720  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2008, 4:19 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
The updated report refers to the use of both 3 & 5 car Mark 2 Trains by 2015, so there must be some consideration being given to buying the C cars in the next couple of orders.

I would suspect by next fall when most of the 48 new markIIs have arrived expo line will be either 4 car mark II trains or 6 Car MarkI trains during peak times.

Can the current 2 car units be split up & used as a make-do C car?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:25 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.