HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1681  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 8:48 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Province announces bus-only lane for White Rock, Surrey commuters

December 11, 2008 12:34 PM

METRO VANCOUVER -- The provincial government broke ground Thursday on a bus lane that will next summer begin carrying White Rock and Surrey commuters along Highway 99 in Richmond to the Canada Line.

"This dedicated bus lane will move transit riders past rush-hour congestion on one of the busiest stretches of Highway 99 northbound," Transportation and Infrastructure Minister Kevin Falcon said in a press release.

The shoulder of Highway 99 northbound from Westminster Highway to Bridgeport Road in Richmond, a distance of 2.8 km, will be widened to create a bus-only lane. The lane will be used by current northbound transit service, and will also be used by RapidBus BC service, once in operation, to carry commuters to the Canada Line's Bridgeport Station.

"The new bus lane will offer superior travel time reliability for south of Fraser commuters connecting to the Canada Line and we appreciate the province's initiative to move quickly on this project," said Tom Prendergast, CEO of TransLink.

Commuters riding RapidBus BC will get point-to-point service with minimal stops along a number of high-profile corridors in the Lower Mainland, including Highway 99 in both directions between White Rock and Richmond.


Jacob Bros. Construction Ltd. of Surrey was awarded a $4.7-million contract to build the four-metre-wide shoulder bus lane, which will be complete in summer 2009.

Also on Thursday, Falcon announced the province and TransLink have entered into cost-sharing agreements for planning and project development for the rapid transit line to the University of B.C. and a rapid transit expansion from the Expo Line in Surrey, two of the new rapid transit lines outlined in the Provincial Transit Plan.

The two agencies will share equally in the costs to develop project plans for the two rapid transit lines.

The UBC Line would begin at Commercial Drive and end at the UBC campus, a total of 12 kilometres.

The Surrey expansion will involve extensions serving the 104th Avenue, Fraser Highway and King George Highway corridors.

The work contemplated under the cost-sharing agreements will be undertaken over the next 16 to 24 months. It will include identification and evaluation of route and technology options.

Both the Surrey expansion and the UBC Line are included in the $14-billion Provincial Transit Plan announced last January.
© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun
     
     
  #1682  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 9:10 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
Is there a southbound bus lane on Highway #99

Ideally there should be bus lanes in both directions in both directions from the 152nd\King George hway ingterchange with some sort of Queue jumper at the tunnel

Last edited by Gordon; Dec 11, 2008 at 9:28 PM.
     
     
  #1683  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 9:11 PM
ravman ravman is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x2 View Post

The UBC Line would begin at Commercial Drive and end at the UBC campus, a total of 12 kilometres.

COMMERCIAL DRIVE?
??? WHAT HAPPENED TO VCC- CLARK??

more reason why this govt is out of touch... they dont even KNOW the stations that currently exist....
     
     
  #1684  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 9:26 PM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by ravman View Post

COMMERCIAL DRIVE?
??? WHAT HAPPENED TO VCC- CLARK??

more reason why this govt is out of touch... they dont even KNOW the stations that currently exist....
     
     
  #1685  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 9:27 PM
Gordon Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
I suspect Kevin Falcon simply mane an error
     
     
  #1686  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 9:52 PM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
I'm not sure it's an error, The millenium line should stop at Commercial, from Commercial to UBC would be the UBC line, VCC-Clark is simply a stop along the new line that happens to already be built.
     
     
  #1687  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 10:00 PM
Whalleyboy's Avatar
Whalleyboy Whalleyboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordon View Post
Is there a southbound bus lane on Highway #99

Ideally there should be bus lanes in both directions in both directions from the 152nd\King George hway ingterchange with some sort of Queue jumper at the tunnel
I agree I'd like to also see a southbound one stupid idiots so concerned about people getting out from south of the Fraser. They gotta start thinking in the reverse to these days. South of Fraser is where the real growing is starting to happen!
     
     
  #1688  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 10:32 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,681
Is this the official gov't press release or just the Sun's version of it. Either way, grab a shovel!
     
     
  #1689  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 10:34 PM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.x2 View Post
[]METRO VANCOUVER -- The provincial government broke ground Thursday on a bus lane that will next summer begin carrying White Rock and Surrey commuters along Highway 99 in Richmond to the Canada Line.
Again, another hint that the Canada Line is opening in the summer? =)
     
     
  #1690  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 11:04 PM
mooks28 mooks28 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 200
Quote:
more reason why this govt is out of touch... they dont even KNOW the stations that currently exist....
It was a news story, not the government release. Chill.
     
     
  #1691  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2008, 11:07 PM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by mooks28 View Post
It was a news story, not the government release. Chill.
I find that the funnier part =D
     
     
  #1692  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 1:47 AM
ravman ravman is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 560
yeah that just about proves the point... the Media ( canwest global... bell globemedia) are heavily biased for the Conservatives and the BC liberals... even the federal liberals are complaining about this..... the point is that the media gets all their info from the govt than doing the legwork themself.... it doesnt matter... it could be a sun article or a govt press release.... they are the exact same propoganda!
     
     
  #1693  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 4:14 AM
jlousa's Avatar
jlousa jlousa is offline
Ferris Wheel Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,371
I just received a CD full of data on the UBC line. I can't post it because it's hundred of mbs in size. I'll probably need a couple of days to go thru it and I'll post the highlights.

Okay I'm only skimming the pages as there are thousands. Looks like the Evergreen is a done deal and will start very shortly, the UBC Surrey and Expo line expansion will all happen at the same time, the decision on the UBC method will be done Feb 2010, (I'm sure nothing to do with the Olympics) The Surrey study will finish just before that but won't start work until after work has started on the UBC line, The Expo line expansion seems to start before everyone. The terminus at UBC is expected to be in the University Boulevard neighbourhood. They are not set on which technology to use, LRT is still on the table but it appears they are favoring Skytrain due to integration. No path is set yet but the study area only covers 500m from Broadway st in each direction (no surprises there). What is interesting is that they expect the UBC line to take into affect the COVs streetcar line which includes Phase 1-3 plus a streetcar along Arbutus and another loop that heads to the False Creek Flats.

Here's a following paragraph that I just cut and pasted from one of the documents.

"SkyTrain currently operates with a mix of 150 Mark I cars and 60 larger Mark II
cars. By the end of 2010, the Mark II fleet will number 108 cars, and possibly 132
cars. Additional fleet will be required to support the Evergreen Line in 2014 and to
accommodate future system expansion and ridership growth. To reach the
maximum capacity of the line, a 3-car Mark II unit will also need to be developed to
allow 5-car trains, the maximum that can be accommodated with existing platforms.
The Mark I cars will likely need to be retired 2020-2025
."

(Cars)Capacity
4-Mark-I 144 (Seat only) 300 (Seat & Stand)
6-Mark-I 216 (Seat only) 450 (Seat & Stand)
2-Mark-II 84 (Seat only) 238 (Seat & Stand)
3-Mark-II 126 (Seat only) 357 (Seat & Stand)
4-Mark-II 168 (Seat only) 476 (Seat & Stand)
5-Mark-II 210 (Seat only) 595 (Seat & Stand)
6-Mark-II 252 (Seat only) 714 (Seat & Stand)

In principle, the SkyTrain system, with its 80 metre platforms, could accommodate a 5-car Mark II train,
made up of existing 2-car units (34.2 m.) coupled with yet-to-be-designed 3-car units (50.9 m.,
incorporating a 16.7 m. centre car). While the resulting 85.1 metre train would overhand the platforms,
the doors would fit within 78 metres, leaving a small, but potentially manageable margin of 1 metre at
each end. Assuming a comparable 130 passengers in the centre section of the 3-car triplet, a 5-car train
could carry 650 passengers under the currently applied loading standards

Peak capacity
Regardless of the length of the SkyTrain line, or the distribution of capacity between various segments, peak capacity in the
peak link will be governed by achieveable headway, and the length and type of train. The accompanying table shows the
headways required to achieve a range of capacities, with different fleet types, based on current loading standards.
Thus, 25,000 passengers per hour would be unachievable with an all-Mark I fleet (in any event, SkyTrain does not have
enough Mark I cars to achieve the higher range), but is within range of a 4-car Mark II fleet, albeit under exceptional
operating demands. (A mixed Mark I and Mark II fleet would be proportionately in between.)
The 5-car Mark II option (subject to technical practicability) should be able to reach 25,000 with some margin, and potentially achieve a rate of 30,000 per hour, perhaps for short duration. (This is calculated with 78sec headways note 72sec headways are possible)


There is just way too much info for me to go thru it all, if someone has the time I can burn them a cd, just pm me. There is some really good info such as separated operating costs for each translink division. All future ridership estimates, and countless other stuff.

Last edited by jlousa; Dec 12, 2008 at 5:29 AM.
     
     
  #1694  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 5:29 AM
Gordon Gordon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,065
I wonder if the 3rd car the fits in the middle of the 2 car articulated units has yet to be designed or have just none been ordered? Maybe if Translink was to order some it may prompt Bombardier to design & produce them?

As far as the Bus lane I wonder if the there will ever be Bus only lanes will ever built from The King George interchange to Bidgeport?
     
     
  #1695  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 5:33 AM
cornholio cornholio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,916
^sweet...thanks for the info.
hopefully the libs stay in power and follow through with everything.

by the sounds of it I dont see a reason for expanding all the stations right now except ones that are in need of upgrades. as long as they can handle 5 car trains they should be fine and can be slowly expanded over the next few decades as the stations get upgraded and renovated. with the money they would save they could buy more trains and buses etc., if i remeber right they earmarked something like 2billion for the station expansions(this number could be slightly off). Whith that you could build another rapid transit line somewhere.
     
     
  #1696  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 5:35 AM
deasine deasine is offline
Vancouver Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
Okay I'm only skimming the pages as there are thousands. Looks like the Evergreen is a done deal and will start very shortly, the UBC Surrey and Expo line expansion will all happen at the same time, the decision on the UBC method will be done Feb 2010, (I'm sure nothing to do with the Olympics)
Sounds good. If they were to separate them, it would be hard to get the everything done before 2020. At least that's how I see it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
What is interesting is that they expect the UBC line to take into affect the COVs streetcar line which includes Phase 1-3 plus a streetcar along Arbutus and another loop that heads to the False Creek Flats.
Hmmmm interesting indeed. We've seen more detailed plans... or at least concepts of the False Creek Flats loop, but hardly any information about the Arbutus one. Out of curiosity, do you know how far the Arbutus Line one goes up to? I hope it goes all the way to Marine Drive Station =P

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
"SkyTrain currently operates with a mix of 150 Mark I cars and 60 larger Mark II
cars. By the end of 2010, the Mark II fleet will number 108 cars, and possibly 132
cars. Additional fleet will be required to support the Evergreen Line in 2014 and to
accommodate future system expansion and ridership growth. To reach the
maximum capacity of the line, a 3-car Mark II unit will also need to be developed to
allow 5-car trains, the maximum that can be accommodated with existing platforms.
The Mark I cars will likely need to be retired 2020-2025
."
Good. I would like them to include the C car as well... Kuala Lumpur will be receiving their shipments of 4-car Mark IIs by next year and the Beijing Airport Express already has C cars running.

Sounds cool. Thanks for sharing.
     
     
  #1697  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 5:38 AM
cornholio cornholio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gordon View Post
I wonder if the 3rd car the fits in the middle of the 2 car articulated units has yet to be designed or have just none been ordered? Maybe if Translink was to order some it may prompt Bombardier to design & produce them?

As far as the Bus lane I wonder if the there will ever be Bus only lanes will ever built from The King George interchange to Bidgeport?
Wonder if bombardier could lease their old manufacturing plant in Burnaby to build all these new trains out here and give our economy a extras little boost. it would defenitly make the liberal look good.

on a related note I think now is the time to get these project planed as quickly as possible and concentrate on Bombardier bids in order to squeeze money out of the feds. thanks to the shape of the economy, especially our east I think the feds will toss more money than usual at project involving bombardier.

edit---just want to ask if anyone knows how quickly and smoothly the MK2 units could be decoupled to form two separate trains that could continue on to different lines to maintain max frequency. It would be pretty cool if they could decouple the trains at Columbia station while the trains are pulled in the station and after A-B-C train can continue to Surrey and a A-B train can continue to Lougheed. If they could do it in like 15-20 seconds then it would be pretty cool.

Last edited by cornholio; Dec 12, 2008 at 5:49 AM.
     
     
  #1698  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 5:46 AM
fever's Avatar
fever fever is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,019
I agree with your point on platform expansion, ch, if that's what the cost is. I'd go with regional rail instead.
     
     
  #1699  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 6:38 AM
cornholio cornholio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by fever View Post
I agree with your point on platform expansion, ch, if that's what the cost is. I'd go with regional rail instead.
just double checked the original sun article from last year and here is what is said.

Quote:
About $3.1 billion will be spent on new stations to extend the Expo Line and on lengthening platforms at existing Expo Line stations to accommodate six-car trains.
http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=f3218ef4-c4fb-413f-bebb-cb8fea512570&k=47746

It also mentioned that the expo line extension is supposed to be 6km. Since recent skytrain expansions have been around 100mill a km then the Expo expansion shouldent be much more than 600mill or so. That means is seems like they were originally projecting well over 2bill for the station expansions, although that seems a bit high at 100mill per station.
     
     
  #1700  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2008, 8:46 AM
mr.x's Avatar
mr.x mr.x is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 12,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlousa View Post
I just received a CD full of data on the UBC line. I can't post it because it's hundred of mbs in size. I'll probably need a couple of days to go thru it and I'll post the highlights.

Okay I'm only skimming the pages as there are thousands. Looks like the Evergreen is a done deal and will start very shortly, the UBC Surrey and Expo line expansion will all happen at the same time, the decision on the UBC method will be done Feb 2010, (I'm sure nothing to do with the Olympics) The Surrey study will finish just before that but won't start work until after work has started on the UBC line, The Expo line expansion seems to start before everyone. The terminus at UBC is expected to be in the University Boulevard neighbourhood. They are not set on which technology to use, LRT is still on the table but it appears they are favoring Skytrain due to integration. No path is set yet but the study area only covers 500m from Broadway st in each direction (no surprises there). What is interesting is that they expect the UBC line to take into affect the COVs streetcar line which includes Phase 1-3 plus a streetcar along Arbutus and another loop that heads to the False Creek Flats.

Here's a following paragraph that I just cut and pasted from one of the documents.

"SkyTrain currently operates with a mix of 150 Mark I cars and 60 larger Mark II
cars. By the end of 2010, the Mark II fleet will number 108 cars, and possibly 132
cars. Additional fleet will be required to support the Evergreen Line in 2014 and to
accommodate future system expansion and ridership growth. To reach the
maximum capacity of the line, a 3-car Mark II unit will also need to be developed to
allow 5-car trains, the maximum that can be accommodated with existing platforms.
The Mark I cars will likely need to be retired 2020-2025
."

(Cars)Capacity
4-Mark-I 144 (Seat only) 300 (Seat & Stand)
6-Mark-I 216 (Seat only) 450 (Seat & Stand)
2-Mark-II 84 (Seat only) 238 (Seat & Stand)
3-Mark-II 126 (Seat only) 357 (Seat & Stand)
4-Mark-II 168 (Seat only) 476 (Seat & Stand)
5-Mark-II 210 (Seat only) 595 (Seat & Stand)
6-Mark-II 252 (Seat only) 714 (Seat & Stand)

In principle, the SkyTrain system, with its 80 metre platforms, could accommodate a 5-car Mark II train,
made up of existing 2-car units (34.2 m.) coupled with yet-to-be-designed 3-car units (50.9 m.,
incorporating a 16.7 m. centre car). While the resulting 85.1 metre train would overhand the platforms,
the doors would fit within 78 metres, leaving a small, but potentially manageable margin of 1 metre at
each end. Assuming a comparable 130 passengers in the centre section of the 3-car triplet, a 5-car train
could carry 650 passengers under the currently applied loading standards

Peak capacity
Regardless of the length of the SkyTrain line, or the distribution of capacity between various segments, peak capacity in the
peak link will be governed by achieveable headway, and the length and type of train. The accompanying table shows the
headways required to achieve a range of capacities, with different fleet types, based on current loading standards.
Thus, 25,000 passengers per hour would be unachievable with an all-Mark I fleet (in any event, SkyTrain does not have
enough Mark I cars to achieve the higher range), but is within range of a 4-car Mark II fleet, albeit under exceptional
operating demands. (A mixed Mark I and Mark II fleet would be proportionately in between.)
The 5-car Mark II option (subject to technical practicability) should be able to reach 25,000 with some margin, and potentially achieve a rate of 30,000 per hour, perhaps for short duration. (This is calculated with 78sec headways note 72sec headways are possible)


There is just way too much info for me to go thru it all, if someone has the time I can burn them a cd, just pm me. There is some really good info such as separated operating costs for each translink division. All future ridership estimates, and countless other stuff.

I love you.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:13 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.