HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5181  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2008, 12:28 AM
P!tt$bur&h's Avatar
P!tt$bur&h P!tt$bur&h is offline
the City of the Future
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 18
New construction projects are (still) changing the face of Pittsburgh

It's been over 19 months since the Post-Gazette first reported on the major developments in Pittsburgh.

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07091/773880-85.stm

Most projects are on target pace or completed. However, there are 3 significant developments that stand out which have little to no forward motion away from the drawing boards and financial constraints.



1. North Shore Live!
• Location: North Shore, North Shore Drive and Art Rooney Boulevard
• Function: Amphitheater, entertainment venues
• Opening: delayed (Originally planned for Late 2008)
• Cost: unknown (Originally $48 million)

2. Market Square Place
• Location: Downtown, Fifth Avenue
• Function: Retail and apartments
• Opening: in progress (Originally planned for Early 2009)
• Cost: $32 million

3. Pittsburgh Cultural Trust Development
• Location: Downtown, Seventh and Ninth streets
• Function: Housing
• Opening: construction delayed (Originally planned for Early 2009)
• Cost: $90 million, first phase

North Shore Live! has been delayed for reasons sprouting from the Steelers ownership deliberation. The site as recently been bought, the entertainment complex and many other projects will be decided at a later date.

Market Square Place has been slowly progressing with the final completion possibly expected in 2010. Tenants and businesses continue to pour in to the Market Square given the planned vision of what the site will look like. Crime has been on the decline in the neighborhood from an increased police presence.

Finally, the Pittsburgh Cultural Trust Development has pushed back the date to begin construction sometime in 2009 when the slumping housing and financial markets are expected to improve.

***Admittedly, the information was hard for me to compile so if anyone has any news on the 3 projects be sure to post them!
     
     
  #5182  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2008, 1:13 AM
themaguffin themaguffin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,311
The Cultural Trust project is basically dead. I'm sure we'll see something for on the North Shore, but the other downtown project seems to be the only one on track.


Of course we have to take the historically bad economic situation into consideration.
     
     
  #5183  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2008, 2:02 AM
Grego43's Avatar
Grego43 Grego43 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 766
Quote:
Originally Posted by tooluther View Post
Ok, for the last time:
1. The North Shore connector's alignment is the easiest way to the Airport from Downtown.
2. The only other way to the North Shore from Downtown is the Ft. Wayne bridge. If they used the alignment it would have been as expensive (the lower deck of the bridge is barely there) and would have required switchbacks to get up to that elevation...making expansion east from that spur (strip district or busway) impossible. PLUS the current Gateway Center and Woods Street Stations would have been a spur rather than the main line.
3. A spine line to Oakland would cost Billions and Billions of dollars. It wasn't an either/or decision. The spine line was killed in the early ‘90’s by county government (granted a big mistake by the Republican County Commissioners) and the Port Authority was luckily able to use the set aside federal dollars for the current project. If they hadn’t the $348 million would have gone to some other city.

5. The receiving pit on the North Shore was built twice as big as needed. In this pit is where the current alignment turns west towards the intermodal center. The extra space will allow an additional cut and cover tunnel to follow Mazoroski way up to the north side and/or a HOV alignment…I know because I’ve been in it.
Hi Tooluther. As you seem to know what you're talking about, I have a couple of questions regarding the NS Connector:

1. Wouldn't a spur from Station Square down the Ohio River then up to the airport be more direct? From the North Shore, a new river crossing must be made downriver.

2. What disqualified the Clemente, Warhol, or Carson bridges from being used as a crossing? The line from Penn Park could have been extended around the convention center and down the median of Ft Duquesne Blvd.

3. Billions and Billions for a line to Oakland? I assume that it was to be subway all the way...why would that be necessary? In Oakland, sure.

Anyway, I'm all for expansion, particularly when the Feds are paying the lion's share. I'm not trying to be a smart ass, I'm just wondering. By the way, would have loved to go into the receiving pit like you did...in the early 80s I walked the under-construction subway from Gateway Center to Steel Plaza (called Midtown Plaza back then) as a university sophomore on an Engineering fieldtrip. That was wild.
     
     
  #5184  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2008, 3:36 AM
Minivan Werner Minivan Werner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 498
Quote:
Originally Posted by P!tt$bur&h View Post
1. North Shore Live!
• Location: North Shore, North Shore Drive and Art Rooney Boulevard
• Function: Amphitheater, entertainment venues
• Opening: delayed (Originally planned for Late 2008)
• Cost: unknown (Originally $48 million)
Ths one I don't see getting completed. I really don't think it's viable or even that necessary. There's plenty of entertainment venues on the North Shore with the science center, casino, Heinz Field, PNC, etc. For the "sea of parking" between Heinz and PNC I'd rather just see some dense commercial go up instead. Maybe some street level retail/restaurants.
     
     
  #5185  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2008, 1:34 PM
Austinlee's Avatar
Austinlee Austinlee is offline
Chillin' in The Burgh
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spring Hill, Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,488
The north shore parcel just completed its sale like last week so we should be hearing news about that development soon. The cultural trust is probably going to be downsized to a smaller size to fit market demand and delayed till the market improves.
     
     
  #5186  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2008, 2:11 PM
themaguffin themaguffin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,311
Quote:
What disqualified the Clemente, Warhol, or Carson bridges from being used as a crossing?
I would think logistically that would be a nightmare.
     
     
  #5187  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2008, 6:08 PM
tooluther's Avatar
tooluther tooluther is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by P!tt$bur&h View Post
New construction projects are (still) changing the face of Pittsburgh

2. Market Square Place
• Location: Downtown, Fifth Avenue
• Function: Retail and apartments
• Opening: in progress (Originally planned for Early 2009)
• Cost: $32 million

Market Square Place has been slowly progressing with the final completion possibly expected in 2010. Tenants and businesses continue to pour in to the Market Square given the planned vision of what the site will look like. Crime has been on the decline in the neighborhood from an increased police presence.
Not sure where you got that date. Market Square Place will be open in July 2009 with the Y opening in August.

Last edited by tooluther; Nov 19, 2008 at 9:04 PM.
     
     
  #5188  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2008, 8:50 PM
EventHorizon EventHorizon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by tooluther View Post
Not sure where you got that date. Market Square Place will be open in July 20009 with the Y opening in August.
ye gods!
     
     
  #5189  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2008, 9:04 PM
JackStraw JackStraw is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,799
This better be one kick ass building if it takes 18,000 years to complete.


What a cheap joke for somebody mistakingly adding one to many zero's, I know I am lame.


I haven't been to Market Square in probably two months. I should get my lazy ass down there and check out the progress. Especially the old gutted out buildings in the alleyways that lead to fifth ave.
     
     
  #5190  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2008, 7:59 AM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
Eurosceptic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 24,141
oh... thank god... this parking lot just shatters the western end of Oakland's Fifth/Forbes business district

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/cityregion/s_599297.html

County may sell prime Oakland land

By Allison M. Heinrichs
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Thursday, November 20, 2008

Allegheny County is shopping for buyers for more than three acres of prime real estate in Oakland, officials confirmed Wednesday.

The four-story building at 3333 Forbes Ave. that houses the county Health Department's executive offices and an 80-space parking lot are the subject of a recently issued request-for-proposals. If the county gets a tempting offer from a responsible developer, it would be willing to move the 49 employees to Lawrenceville, where the air quality program is housed.

The 2007 market value of the land and building is almost $5.2 million, according to Allegheny County assessment records.

"That's an incredibly valuable piece of property," said county spokesman Kevin Evanto. "It sits in the middle of Oakland, which ... has very little developable property left. The county is putting this out basically to see what the private sector might come up with. That could be reuse, demolition, construction. Everything is on the table."

The property between Forbes and Fifth avenues and close to the Interstate 376 entrance is near property owned by UPMC, the University of Pittsburgh and Carlow University.

Nobody has an option to buy it yet, Evanto said. The county Department of Economic Development wants proposals by Dec. 12.

The building was constructed in the 1930s as a Depression-era public works project and served as a juvenile detention center. The shrinking Health Department staff occupies two upper floors. Bottom floors are vacant.

Allison M. Heinrichs can be reached at [email protected] or 412-380-5607.
     
     
  #5191  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2008, 8:02 AM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
Eurosceptic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 24,141
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/cityregion/s_599285.html

Group backs aid for young home buyers in city

By Jeremy Boren
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Thursday, November 20, 2008


Mayor Luke Ravenstahl's handpicked panel of 20- and 30-somethings urged him Wednesday to offer tax breaks to first-time home buyers and to market Pittsburgh as an affordable place for immigrants to live.

After more than a year of work, the 30-member Propel Pittsburgh Commission made its first recommendations to Ravenstahl, who personally tapped many of the young professionals to brainstorm ways to reverse Pittsburgh's population decline.

"We want to open the door to new homeowners," said Craig Laurenson, 30, of Observatory Hill.

The commission's Policy, Transportation and Infrastructure subcommittee chair, Laurenson proposed reducing Pittsburgh's 3 percent real estate-transfer tax for first-time home buyers to compete with the 1- to 1.5-percent rates common in suburbs, such as Ross, Shaler and Mt. Lebanon. Pennsylvania imposes a 1 percent transfer tax in municipalities statewide.

A $100,000 house in Pittsburgh carries a $4,000 transfer tax, twice as much as a comparable home in neighboring West View, the group told Ravenstahl.

"That's a lot of money to a first-time home buyer," said George Hackett, president of Coldwell Banker Real Estate in Pittsburgh and West Penn Multi-List, a home-listing service.

Ravenstahl said he plans to consider the commission's recommendations, and some eventually could become legislation. He chose 21 of the commission's members; the remainder were chosen by City Council members.

Rich Gasperini Jr., 28, of the South Side and chair of Propel's Diversity, Outreach and Civic Engagement subcommittee, stressed the need to promote Pittsburgh as an immigrant-friendly place. He pointed to Boston, where the Mayor's Office of New Bostonians helps immigrants settle in the city.

"A lot of the growth is driven by immigration," said Gasperini, an industrial real estate broker with CB Richard Ellis. Boston's population has increased by 25,000 since 1990, while Pittsburgh's has fallen by more than 58,000.

Pittsburgh's tiny Hispanic population -- about 1.8 percent compared to 15 percent nationwide -- illustrates the need to attract immigrants, said Victor Diaz, chief executive officer of the Hispanic Metropolitan Area Chamber of Commerce.

He said Hispanics want to live in cities with quality mass-transit systems and low-cost housing. Diaz said the Propel Commission's ideas are on target, but they needlessly duplicate the efforts of the Allegheny County's Global Competitiveness Initiative.

"We are the largest minority in this country. We are the only growing demographic in the region, but we are under 2 percent in Allegheny County," Diaz said. "We don't do enough to lure the (easiest) immigrants ... legal Hispanics."

Jeremy Boren can be reached at [email protected] or 412-765-2312.
     
     
  #5192  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2008, 8:07 AM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
Eurosceptic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 24,141
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08325/929362-147.stm

Transit 'smart' cards wait on county


Port Authority picks automated fare system, but needs $1.1M more


Thursday, November 20, 2008
By Joe Grata, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

The Port Authority has selected a company to replace its old fare boxes with a new automated fare collection system using "smart cards" with embedded electronic chips.

Administrators yesterday recommended awarding a contract for a maximum of $33 million to Scheidt & Bachmann USA Inc., which has been involved internationally with cutting-edge transportation technology for 25 years.

But there's one big hitch.

While federal and state money are lined up, the authority needs a $1.1 million commitment from Allegheny County as its 3.33 percent share of matching funds, and so far the county isn't willing to commit.

The Port Authority last month asked Allegheny County for $9.9 million to leverage more state and federal funds for capital improvements, but County Executive Dan Onorato said the agency will get $6.3 million "and not one penny more" next year.

"It's not that the county opposes the new fare collection system," authority Chief Executive Officer Steve Bland said, but it has numerous obligations of its own and only so much to dole out.

If the county gives only $6.3 million to the authority for its capital budget, the money quickly will be gobbled up by previous debt obligations and projects already under way, including the $435 million Light Rail Transit system extension to the North Shore and new buses.

"A lot can happen between now and January," when Scheidt & Bachmann can withdraw its offer, Mr. Bland said. "We'll have to sort things out."

If the authority can somehow provide the $1.1 million local share over a two-year period, officials said, installation of 1,100 fare boxes could begin on buses and trolleys by August and the system could be operational by January 2010.

"It's an important project to us," said Claudia Allen, the authority's longtime finance director, ticking off a list of improvements to be compared with today's fare collection system that is antiquated by industry standards.

Benefits include increasing revenue resulting from reduced evasion and fraud and better fare accuracy while lowering expenses through simplifying operator duties, improving passenger flow, requiring fewer "money room" personnel and eliminating abuses with student ID cards.

The contract has been structured with Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission input so that nine regional carriers including the Beaver, Butler and Westmoreland county transit authorities could "buy in" and offer their riders the same system.

Scheidt & Bachmann would provide 30 ticket vending machines, 4 million limited-use smart cards, 400,000 permanent smart cards, data transfer, and related equipment, employee training and a two-year warranty.

Authority officials and staff have spent more than two years planning, developing and deciding upon a vendor for a changeover to the automated fare collection system.

Scheidt & Bachmann finished first among three companies evaluated by a special panel that included the SPC and representatives of the regional carriers.

Joe Grata can be reached at [email protected] or 412-263-1985.


...



Groups urge Port Authority, union to settle labor dispute

Thursday, November 20, 2008
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Dozens of business and community groups yesterday urged the Port Authority and the leaders of its drivers union to work for "a responsible settlement" in the current labor dispute that threatens to disrupt service Dec. 1.

Specifically, they suggested that a fact finder's report issued in August become the basis for a new contract with Local 85, Amalgamated Transit Union, because it represents "a workable compromise."

The request to settle the impasse and avoid a transit crisis came from 43 sources, including the Greater Pittsburgh Chamber of Commerce, an affiliate of the Allegheny Conference on Community Development; Sustainable Pittsburgh; the African American Chamber of Commerce; and the Pittsburgh Partnership for Neighborhood Development.

The authority's board accepted the fact finder's report, but the 20-member executive board of the Amalgamated Transit Union's Local 85 rejected it.

Because the fact finder's report was rejected by the union and further negotiations proved fruitless, the authority board has voted to impose its "last and final" contract as of Dec. 1. That could lead to a work stoppage that management has said would constitute a strike but the union has said would be a lockout and illegal.

In case of a service shutdown that would affect people accounting for 240,000 bus and trolley rides a day, the groups yesterday introduced a Web site, keeppittsburghmoving.com, that will provide information and resources to help people get around.
     
     
  #5193  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2008, 8:17 AM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
Eurosceptic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 24,141
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08325/929364-53.stm

The missing link: Officials unveil plans for $8.5 million riverfront trail connecting Point to Strip

Thursday, November 20, 2008
By Mark Belko, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette


LaQuatra Bonci Associates
An artist's rendering of the proposed riverfront park in front of the David L. Lawrence Convention Center.

Visitors who traverse the fancy water feature at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center now run into a dead end when they reach a large concrete pad at the edge of the Allegheny River.

But a plan to transform that bleak patch of concrete into a riverfront oasis finally may be ready to move forward.

City-Allegheny County Sports & Exhibition Authority officials are hoping to start construction this summer of an $8.5 million riverfront park at the convention center, the last piece needed to provide a continuous trail along the Allegheny from the Strip District to Point State Park, Downtown.

"It is the missing tooth between the full renovation of Point State Park and the Allegheny Riverfront Park in the Strip," said Lisa Schroeder, executive director of the Riverlife Task Force.

The new park would feature a platform that would extend about 25 feet into the water and provide docking for the Gateway Clipper Fleet, water taxis and other boats.

To the east, a suspended sidewalk would gently rise about 15 feet from the platform to Fort Duquesne Boulevard and connect with the Strip trail. To the west, the park would link up with a existing riverfront trail that runs to Point State Park.

There also will be steps to take visitors from 10th Street near the convention center's east lobby to the platform. The only way visitors can get from the center to the river now is to use the water feature, which runs downhill along 10th from the Penn Avenue area.

Architect LaQuatra Bonci Associates also plans to build hillsides with lots of greenery and replace the concrete that now slopes down to the river with trees. The park itself would stretch from the Rachel Carson Bridge to the Fort Wayne railroad bridge.

The area at water's edge is "pretty dead right now," said Joe Hackett, principal at LaQuatra Bonci Associates. "There's no reason to be there. There's no way to get to it."

A series of pipes will provide the support for the platform. Mr. Hackett said the design not only is very cost-effective but allows water to run underneath the platform and protects the river habitat.

Authority Executive Director Mary Conturo said the goal in designing the park was to create a green area, offer docking and walking space, and provide a gathering point.

"We're pleased with the design. We think it accomplished all of those things in a very nice way," she said.

The authority is hoping to bid the project this spring in preparation for the summer construction. The park should be completed in a year.

Before the agency can begin, however, it still must secure about $2.3 million in funding to supplement the $6.2 million it currently has available.

With the project so close to starting, Ms. Conturo is optimistic about getting the additional money.

"As you get closer to having a real project, sometimes it's easier to get the funding," she said.

Ms. Schroeder said completion of the park is "absolutely critical." It is one of several projects close to starting that will greatly enhance the city's existing trail network, she said. The others are at the Mon Wharf and the SouthSide Works complex.

When they and the Point State Park renovations have been completed, the proposed 3 Rivers Park, stretching a little more than 12 miles from the West End Bridge on the Ohio River to the Hot Metal Bridge on the Monongahela to the 31st Street Bridge on the Allegheny, will be about 80 percent complete, Ms. Schroeder said.

Mark Belko can be reached at [email protected] or 412-263-1262.
     
     
  #5194  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2008, 8:26 AM
Evergrey's Avatar
Evergrey Evergrey is offline
Eurosceptic
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 24,141
http://www.popcitymedia.com/developmentnews/mews1119.aspx

Upscale green town home projects debut new model, start next phase on South Side




Riverside Mews and Windom Hill Place—two of Pittsburgh’s innovative green living developments—have debuted a new model unit and kicked-off second phases of construction. The 2,300-square-foot Energy Star-compliant model, now available for $480,331, features a contemporary design, espresso finishes and quartz countertops.

At Riverside Mews—the South Side’s largest green residential community—work has started on six new town homes. Ranging in size from 1,800 to 2,900 square feet, the three-story units will be priced between $415,000 and $530,000. Designed by Perkins Eastman and Strada, the 48-unit project is located at 18th St. and Riverfront Park.

Since its grand opening in Nov. 2007, seven of Riverside’s first eight units have sold. Built according to Energy Star standards, Riverside features FSC-certified wood, Greenguard flooring materials and significant energy saving systems. “They all have small yards, which is great for the city,” says Kathryn Barry, with Prudential Preferred Realty, who expects occupancy to start in March 2009. “Things are looking good for Pittsburgh.” One new unit, which features a fourth floor, has pre-sold for $580,000.

Construction on Windom’s four new units, priced at $745,000 and located above McArdle Roadway, will begin after the first unit is sold. Windom’s award-winning Craftsman-style town homes were designed by John Martine of Strada. The 3,000-square-foot units feature three bedrooms, four levels of outdoor space, and earth friendly bamboo, cork and cast stone interiors.

“We have people relocating to Pittsburgh from other states,” adds Barry, who’s been featured on HGTV's My House is Worth What? “There’s still mortgage money out there.” Contractor for both projects is Sota Construction Services.

To receive Pop City free every week, click here.

Writer: Jennifer Baron
Source: Kathryn Barry, Prudential Preferred Realty

Image courtesy Prudential Preferred Realty


...


http://www.popcitymedia.com/developmentnews/941penn1119.aspx

$9M 941 Penn welcomes first residents, $8M Otto Milk Condos 25% sold



941 Penn Avenue Residences is welcoming its first occupants, while pre-sales at Otto Milk Condos have reached 25%.

941 Penn—Downtown’s first condominium to receive the city’s Enhanced LERTA 10-year post-assessment tax abatement—welcomed its first residents on Nov. 12. Condo owners like Todd and Dorna Palcic, expected to save $60,000 in 10 years, were greeted by Mayor Ravenstahl. With 17 condos ranging in size from 1,350 to 3,000 square-feet, the $9 million project features a glass exterior, nine-story atrium, terraces, and historic masonry.

“Our demographic spans four decades age-wise. We have people from Seattle, Kuwait—all over the world” says project spokesperson Kathy Wallace. “They’re the first buyers Downtown to have this benefit applied to their property.” Enhancing existing LERTA and Act 42 tax abatement programs, the legislation is spurring development Downtown and in 26 neighborhood growth zones.

Jack Benoff of Solara Ventures, developer of 941 Penn, is also redeveloping the Strip District’s Otto Milk building as a 56-unit condominium. Located at 2501 Smallman St., the 120,000-square-foot project will feature a pet washing facility, gym, courtyard, and business center. With site clean-up and demolition underway, the $20 million project is expected to be completed in late 2009.

Ranging in size from 800 to 3,600 square feet, condos are priced between $183,000 and $1.3 million. “We want a first-time buyer price range. Within 500 feet, you can go to a neighborhood pub, deli, club or high-end restaurant,” adds Benoff, who is working with Indovina Associates Architects on both projects. “We’re restoring the tower back to its original look. We’re keeping the majority of the existing structure and adding a contemporary connecting building.”

Writer: Jennifer Baron
Sources: Jack Benoff and Kathy Wallace, Solara Ventures, IV, LLC


...


http://www.popcitymedia.com/developmentnews/oaklnd1119.aspx

$15M Schenley Place office development gets greenlight in Oakland



Plans to bring a new seven-story office development to the comer of Bigelow Blvd. and Bayard St. are moving forward in Oakland.

After undergoing a redesign process, the $15 million Schenley Place project received approval from Pittsburgh’s Planning Commission on Nov. 4. Planned for one of the last developable parcels in Oakland, the 100,000-square-foot office property will be constructed on a parking lot owned by the First Baptist Church of Pittsburgh.

“We’ve redesigned the entire exterior using materials that have broken down the building’s mass, to provide an image that blends in much better architecturally, particularly with that part of Oakland,” says Bill Hunt, with Bigelow Square-based project developer, The Elmhurst Group. “The design is set back and is a good portal point as you come down Bigelow into Oakland. The neighbors agree that this makes sense.”

Architect Burt Hill is currently completing final drawings for the project, which Hunt says is now one floor lower and 15,000 square feet smaller than originally planned. Designed to feature masonry that matches nearby buildings including the University of Pittsburgh’s Ruskin Hall and First Baptist Church, the project will also include a small public park and an integral 60-car garage.

“Our goal is pursue green design and be LEED certified,” adds Hunt,” who expects to select a contractor and break ground on the 18-month project during spring 2009. “We’re looking at a traditional office building. It could have a medical component.”

Writer: Jennifer Baron
Source: Bill Hunt, president, The Elmhurst Group

Image courtesy The Elmhurst Group


...


http://www.popcitymedia.com/developmentnews/kuhns1119.aspx

Kuhn's selected for Pittsburgh's Hill District, East Liberty planning for Target

Kuhn’s Market is headed to Pittsburgh’s Hill District, while plans are progressing to bring a Target to East Liberty.

After soliciting and reviewing proposals from Kuhn’s and Save-A-Lot, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA), has selected Pittsburgh-based and family owned Kuhn’s Market as operator for a 40,000-square-foot full-service store planned for the corner of Centre Ave. and Heldman St. The property is jointly owned by the URA and Allegheny Union Baptist Association.

The URA and Pittsburgh Penguins have each committed $1 million to the project, which is under development by Hill House Economic Development Corporation. “This is really the beginning. We’re excited and optimistic,” says Robert Rubinstein, with the URA. “There’s still work to be done on the financing, but we’re confident that the team in place can achieve that.”

In East Liberty, plans under development by The Mosites Company are progressing to bring a 156,000-square-foot Target to 6231 Penn Ave., the site of the neighborhood’s remaining high-rise tower. “We’re pursuing an East Liberty Gateway TIFF to support a $7 million public infrastructure project along Penn and to reconfigure the bus way,” adds Rubinstein, who says the URA is assisting with infrastructure and acquisition financing.

On Dec. 2, the project will be presented during a public Planning Commission hearing. “They’ve met with the Contextual Design Advisory Panel and made significant changes. They’ve improved the entrance and facade and are adding clerestory windows,” says Corey Layman, with the Department of City Planning. “It’ll be the first Target store in the U.S. with windows.”

Construction on the city's first Target is slated to start in June 2009, with occupancy expected in October 2010.

To receive Pop City free every week, click here.

Writer: Jennifer Baron
Sources: Robert Rubinstein, Director, Economic Development, Urban Redevelopment Authority; Corey Layman, Design Review Specialist, Department of City Planning
     
     
  #5195  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2008, 4:57 PM
Austinlee's Avatar
Austinlee Austinlee is offline
Chillin' in The Burgh
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Spring Hill, Pittsburgh
Posts: 12,488
A flurry of articles! Nice work Evergrey.

We NEED that riverfront park in front of the convention center. Can't wait to see that completed.
     
     
  #5196  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2008, 5:47 PM
JackStraw JackStraw is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,799
I have mixed feelings on big box stores entering East Liberty. Yay! the first target with windows! What a great achievment for big box architects. I can't believe they expanded the design budget to stray from the prototype and design a building with windows. Maybe every township, town, suburb, etc should have a "Contextual Design Advisory Panel" to help stop these homogenous stores slapping their prototypical shit in everytown. People don't realize that when stores or restaurants want to put this crap in their town they can force them to make a design to fit in their town or else. Many small Rocky Mountian ski towns will only let McDonalds build unless it fits in with the local lodge style architecture. Than you don't get shit like the Burger king on the South side.


That was an impressive list of articles. The riverfront Trail from the point to the strip is going to be nice, and is what the convention center needs. We need to utilize our river front here more in Pittsburgh.
     
     
  #5197  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2008, 10:09 PM
dugdogmaster's Avatar
dugdogmaster dugdogmaster is offline
Unpolitically Correct
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Western PA
Posts: 1,649
So, a horribly run money pit of a port authority is asking for even more money When will PAT, the City and County ever learn?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evergrey View Post
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08325/929362-147.stm

Transit 'smart' cards wait on county


Port Authority picks automated fare system, but needs $1.1M more

     
     
  #5198  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2008, 10:25 PM
Dr Nevergold Dr Nevergold is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 19,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugdogmaster View Post
So, a horribly run money pit of a port authority is asking for even more money When will PAT, the City and County ever learn?
Isn't that something funded out of the capital budget? PAT's problems are entirely related to labor benefit costs and oversized salaries and high gas prices, not capital budget programs. At least gasoline is down substantially.
     
     
  #5199  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2008, 10:27 PM
Dr Nevergold Dr Nevergold is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 19,889
Oh, and as much as I dislike the big box only feeling of many areas, I think for East Liberty its better to get an urban looking Target than to be without. Its not like anything else will easily come in and give the area as much of a lift.
     
     
  #5200  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2008, 10:55 PM
AaronPGH's Avatar
AaronPGH AaronPGH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PGH
Posts: 1,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by dugdogmaster View Post
So, a horribly run money pit of a port authority is asking for even more money When will PAT, the City and County ever learn?
It's ironic though that they're stalled out needing money for something that will save them more money.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:29 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.