HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2981  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2008, 2:03 AM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 40,854
From Kwajo in the Moncton thread:

In the spirit of togetherness, from a Saint Johner to all of you Monctonians, I'd like to wish all my fellow New Brunswickers a Happy New Brunswick Day! May the coming years bring us all a renewed sense of provincial pride, and let's all work together to ensure that NB not only weathers the global economic storm, but rises above it as well!

Cheers!



Thanks for the sentiment Kwajo. Together we are stronger. Both Moncton and Saint John are vital to the New Brunswick economy.

Happy New Brunswick Day to all!!!!

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2982  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2008, 2:44 AM
random11's Avatar
random11 random11 is offline
Believer in the future
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Saint John
Posts: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by SJTOKO View Post


It's still got a long way to go. Correct me if i'm wrong but isn't this ship being built that ugly shed beside the Cruise Ship Terminal? What's keeping the port from ripping that peice of junk down and leasing the land for a fair price... Tons of prime property being wasted..
The Port Authority "claims" that this building (Pugsley C) is in far better condition than the former building (Pugsley A/B) which was demolished to create space for the new Cruise Welcome Center. Personally, what difference does it make - to my knowledge this shed used to house paper for shipping but I haven't seen anything other than a cruise ship dock there in years so I agree with you .. get it down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2983  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2008, 3:03 AM
random11's Avatar
random11 random11 is offline
Believer in the future
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Saint John
Posts: 199
I am curious if anybody else reading this has encountered this "issue".

I have attempted to contact Mayor Ivan Court via his email address 8 times. Each time I receive this following:

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification

THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.

YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.

Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:

[email protected]

Message will be retried for 2 more day(s)

Technical details of temporary failure:
The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect.

Now, I am mentioning this because I also tried to contact [email protected] and I receive the exact same message. Interestingly, I have sent emails to all other members of council and they are received and several have responsed. I love a good conspiracy hahaha, but I wondered if anybody else is getting these problems.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2984  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2008, 1:59 PM
PostModernPrometheus's Avatar
PostModernPrometheus PostModernPrometheus is offline
Harbour Passage User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Greater Saint John, NB
Posts: 637
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
[/I]


Thanks for the sentiment Kwajo. Together we are stronger. Both Moncton and Saint John are vital to the New Brunswick economy.

Happy New Brunswick Day to all!!!!

sentiment echoed....

you're right - the reality is that we are linked, and each city will ebb and flow in relative terms with regards to development, population, etc, etc. learning to accept each for what it is is cruicial (? where else can you find two cities so different in such close proximity to one another???)
__________________
If you can't convince them, confuse them.

- Harry S Truman
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2985  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2008, 3:03 PM
SJTOKO SJTOKO is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 312
Quote:
Originally Posted by PostModernPrometheus View Post
sentiment echoed....

you're right - the reality is that we are linked, and each city will ebb and flow in relative terms with regards to development, population, etc, etc. learning to accept each for what it is is cruicial (? where else can you find two cities so different in such close proximity to one another???)
I feel the love!!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2986  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2008, 5:26 PM
mmmatt's Avatar
mmmatt mmmatt is offline
Our Tide is Rising
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,755
HAPPY NEW BRUNSWICK DAY!!!



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2987  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2008, 9:26 PM
Helladog's Avatar
Helladog Helladog is offline
Unregistered Loser
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NB
Posts: 1,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by random11 View Post
I am curious if anybody else reading this has encountered this "issue".

I have attempted to contact Mayor Ivan Court via his email address 8 times. Each time I receive this following:

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification

THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.

YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.

Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:

[email protected]

Message will be retried for 2 more day(s)

Technical details of temporary failure:
The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect.

Now, I am mentioning this because I also tried to contact [email protected] and I receive the exact same message. Interestingly, I have sent emails to all other members of council and they are received and several have responsed. I love a good conspiracy hahaha, but I wondered if anybody else is getting these problems.
I sent a common message to all and had no problems. I did get a few replies so far, but of course none from those two. Norm used to write back in good time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2988  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2008, 9:28 PM
Helladog's Avatar
Helladog Helladog is offline
Unregistered Loser
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NB
Posts: 1,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by SJTOKO View Post
I feel the love!!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2989  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2008, 9:36 PM
Helladog's Avatar
Helladog Helladog is offline
Unregistered Loser
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NB
Posts: 1,412
T'day's Pix

CRUISE SHIP TERMINAL / PARK







SOMERSET^2



ER EXPANSION





UNIVERSITY COMMONS



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2990  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2008, 11:29 AM
PostModernPrometheus's Avatar
PostModernPrometheus PostModernPrometheus is offline
Harbour Passage User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Greater Saint John, NB
Posts: 637
^

thanks for the frequent photo updates Helladog - the time & effort is much appreciated. absolutely love the shot of the ship pulling up to the new terminal...
__________________
If you can't convince them, confuse them.

- Harry S Truman
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2991  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2008, 11:30 AM
PostModernPrometheus's Avatar
PostModernPrometheus PostModernPrometheus is offline
Harbour Passage User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Greater Saint John, NB
Posts: 637
Quote:
Originally Posted by random11 View Post
I am curious if anybody else reading this has encountered this "issue".
.
i've never received that kind of message, but on the other hand, i've also never received a response yet from him, either.
__________________
If you can't convince them, confuse them.

- Harry S Truman
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2992  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2008, 11:43 AM
PostModernPrometheus's Avatar
PostModernPrometheus PostModernPrometheus is offline
Harbour Passage User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Greater Saint John, NB
Posts: 637
Nice article in the TJ today...Maine is looking at investing 2 BILLION into power grid / transmission upgrades across the state including upgrading and creating new power line corridors to New Brunswick over the next 3-5 years



looks like some serious US economic committment (even in the midst of a not so hot US economy...) to linking with an evolving energy hub....



http://telegraphjournal.canadaeast.com/article/374729
__________________
If you can't convince them, confuse them.

- Harry S Truman

Last edited by PostModernPrometheus; Aug 5, 2008 at 12:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2993  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2008, 11:49 AM
PostModernPrometheus's Avatar
PostModernPrometheus PostModernPrometheus is offline
Harbour Passage User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Greater Saint John, NB
Posts: 637
Long Wharf proposal draws crowdPublished Tuesday August 5th, 2008


Civic affairs 30 groups and individuals want voices heard by council prior to Aug. 18 vote
C3John Mazerolle

SAINT JOHN - It appears likely that common council will spend more time hearing the upside of the proposed Long Wharf deal than the downside.

Fifteen of the groups or individuals that want to make presentations to council have already made their opinion on the land swap clear - 10 definitely say yes, two tentatively say yes, and three say no.

A total of 30 presenters will stand before council at its special meeting on Aug. 11, but only half have publicly stated their position, either in the media or in letters to council.

The presenters will be weighing in on the following question: "Should the municipality agree to sell the former Lantic Sugar site at fair market value, in order to facilitate a possible transaction between the Saint John Port Authority and Irving Oil Limited?"

The port authority and Irving Oil have signed a memorandum of understanding that the Irving company would build its new headquarters on port land at Long Wharf.

In return, Irving Oil would buy the former Lantic Sugar refinery site from the City of Saint John and hand it to the port.

Council will hear from the presenters at 5 p.m. on Aug. 11, then council members will debate the question themselves on Aug. 18.

Those who will speak in favour include Moosehead Breweries executive chairman Derek Oland, Fundy Engineering and Consulting Ltd., and uptown convenience store owner Terry Davies.

Davies wrote that he will speak in favour "because the sale of that land is key to maintaining jobs in the uptown and to the viability of my business.

"The sale will help build a better community, create enormous momentum for our entire region and help grow our economy."

In its letter to council, Fundy Engineering says waterfront development has helped with the "buoyant can-do attitude that is prevalent today in Saint John. We strongly recommend that this win/win proposal be accepted."

Tim Curry of the Atlantica Centre for Energy will also support the project, as will major economic development groups in the city - Uptown Saint John, Enterprise Saint John, the Saint John Board of Trade and the Saint John Waterfront Development Partnership.

Curry says the investment in the waterfront will attract further investment in the burgeoning energy hub.

"Municipal support for the establishing of a signature head office building for an active regional energy organization in uptown Saint John would send a positive message to potential investors."

Two presenters who have expressed cautious optimism about the project, but who wanted the public outreach to happen first, are uptown shop owner Anne-Marie Mullin and Saint John MP Paul Zed.

Those who will speak against are Saint John Lancaster MLA Abel LeBlanc and the International Longshoremen's Association Local 273, the two most vocal opponents of the deal. They argue that the port should not be giving up any of its infrastructure.

The third presenter clearly against so far is citizen Linda Stoddard. She does not elaborate in her letter to council, although she has written letters to the Telegraph-Journal condemning the LNG tax concession and weighing in on other topics.



http://telegraphjournal.canadaeast.com/city/article/374682
__________________
If you can't convince them, confuse them.

- Harry S Truman
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2994  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2008, 12:19 PM
PostModernPrometheus's Avatar
PostModernPrometheus PostModernPrometheus is offline
Harbour Passage User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Greater Saint John, NB
Posts: 637
Quote:
Originally Posted by PostModernPrometheus View Post
Those who will speak against are Saint John Lancaster MLA Abel LeBlanc and the International Longshoremen's Association Local 273, the two most vocal opponents of the deal. They argue that the port should not be giving up any of its infrastructure.

http://telegraphjournal.canadaeast.com/city/article/374682
I guess my own view on that aspect of the article is that the argument above is a tired and short sighted one. . . it seems to fall into the any-kind-of-change-is-a-scary-thing mentality; that being said, we're all entitled to our opinions.

taking the revenue from the land swapto invest / upgrade the west side piers and cargo transportation systems makes a heck of a lot more sense to me. . .
__________________
If you can't convince them, confuse them.

- Harry S Truman
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2995  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2008, 12:36 PM
thefishingnut thefishingnut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Quispamsis, NB
Posts: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by random11 View Post
I am curious if anybody else reading this has encountered this "issue".

I have attempted to contact Mayor Ivan Court via his email address 8 times. Each time I receive this following:

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification

THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.

YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.

Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:

[email protected]

Message will be retried for 2 more day(s)

Technical details of temporary failure:
The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect.

Now, I am mentioning this because I also tried to contact [email protected] and I receive the exact same message. Interestingly, I have sent emails to all other members of council and they are received and several have responsed. I love a good conspiracy hahaha, but I wondered if anybody else is getting these problems.

(Tounge in cheek) Your mail is being filtered out because your e-mail address isn't from the Longshoremans Union.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2996  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2008, 12:47 PM
phishy phishy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by random11 View Post
I am curious if anybody else reading this has encountered this "issue".

I have attempted to contact Mayor Ivan Court via his email address 8 times. Each time I receive this following:

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification

THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.

YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.

Delivery to the following recipient has been delayed:

[email protected]

Message will be retried for 2 more day(s)

Technical details of temporary failure:
The recipient server did not accept our requests to connect.

Now, I am mentioning this because I also tried to contact [email protected] and I receive the exact same message. Interestingly, I have sent emails to all other members of council and they are received and several have responsed. I love a good conspiracy hahaha, but I wondered if anybody else is getting these problems.
This is a client side thing - meaning on your end, not the recipients. Maybe there is a backlog in your mail queue, or they were doing maintenance. The message would have been delivered eventually unless you got a bounce back as it being undeliverable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2997  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2008, 1:06 PM
kwajo's Avatar
kwajo kwajo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Uptown, Saint John
Posts: 1,686
Has anyone else heard this stuff about Abel LeBlanc claiming he has a condo developer lined up for the Lantic Sugar Site, and that the city should sell the site for condos and have Long Wharf remain a part of the working port?

Any thoughts?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2998  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2008, 1:46 PM
PersonPlaceorThing's Avatar
PersonPlaceorThing PersonPlaceorThing is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saint John
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwajo View Post
Has anyone else heard this stuff about Abel LeBlanc claiming he has a condo developer lined up for the Lantic Sugar Site, and that the city should sell the site for condos and have Long Wharf remain a part of the working port?

Any thoughts?
I haven't heard that but would like to know who the developer is and what the environmental remediation cost estimates for the project would be. Rocca bought his land from the city for $400,000, clean. If the Lantic Sugar site costs even $2,000,000 to clean up (it could be more) and the city gave the land to a condo developer, they would be $1.6 million behind Rocca in regard to costs.

Also, while Rocca has sold 2/3 of the first tower in a month or so, he still has about half his project to sell. There are still condos to sell at Robertson's Wharf.

I don't see an immediate business case for condo development at Lantic Sugar - especially if the development at the Coast Guard site starts.

If Able does as well as he did at the NEB pipeline hearing there won't be problems. His main arguements there were based on local distribution lines - missing the point all together.

However, council has several fools and could be swayed by poor arguments.
__________________
Urban Plans for Saint John and Beyond: http://urbanplans.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2999  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2008, 5:43 PM
PersonPlaceorThing's Avatar
PersonPlaceorThing PersonPlaceorThing is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Saint John
Posts: 467
Irving Oil HQ diamond contest

I went and dropped off my Yes ballot today at the uptown jeweler polling citizens about the IOL HQ. There were four other people who voted as I was walking up to the box. I also saw 2 others dropping ballots off when I was through Brunswick Square for a meeting earlier this afternoon.
__________________
Urban Plans for Saint John and Beyond: http://urbanplans.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3000  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2008, 2:08 AM
random11's Avatar
random11 random11 is offline
Believer in the future
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Saint John
Posts: 199
I haven't seen this mentioned in the blog however, prudent to note that Abel LeBlanc was Ivan Court's Assistant Campaign Manager in the most recent civic election. Can you say conflict of interest?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:13 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.