HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2961  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2008, 7:09 PM
random11's Avatar
random11 random11 is offline
Believer in the future
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Saint John
Posts: 199
SAINT JOHN - The International Longshoremen's Association is directly interfering with business affairs of the port by lobbying to scuttle a $30-million proposal by Irving Oil to build its world headquarters at Long Wharf, says port authority chairman Stephen Campbell.

"There's not one ILA job that will be lost as a result of this proposal," says Campbell.

"I just find the opposition to this proposal to be very self-centred. There seems to be no consideration to the long-term interest of the port or the city. It's extremely selfish."

Deputy Mayor Stephen Chase, a strong supporter of the project, says he has faith in the port's business operators, who are also chomping at the bit to see the project go through.

"Ultimately, I'll defer to the body that's been given the responsibility of operating that port. I have a concern with any union group that steps out of the role of employee-employer relationships and gets into controlling actual business, whether it's the port or the City of Saint John. Fundamentally, I am opposed to that."

Both Pat Riley, business agent for ILA Local 273, and Don Scott, general manager of the Port of Saint John Employers Association Inc., believe the ILA has a right to fight the issue.

"We nominate one of the directors to the port authority board, so we are directly involved in administering the port from the standpoint of being a named port user and a named nominator for the port authority board of directors," says Riley.

Scott believes Local 273 is a stakeholder because longshoremen make their living at the port.

"They certainly have a stake, in my opinion, in what goes on down here. Is it to the extent they're pushing this? I don't know," says Scott, who represents three contracting/stevedoring companies that work the port, and negotiates and administers collective labour agreements with the ILA. "They perceive this as losing a valuable piece of land and not getting as valuable a piece back. They certainly have, in my opinion, their right to fight the issue."

The Port of Saint John Employers Association Inc. exists under mandate because the port is a multi-employer industry that is federally regulated. That makes the association the ILA's direct employer.

"If there were two employers, you wouldn't want the union to negotiate with employer 'A', then go get a sweeter deal with employer 'B'," explains Scott. "This way it's on a level playing field."

Campbell says the port authority has always "bent over backwards" to be fair to all stakeholders, "even when it wasn't their mandate.

"We would argue pretty strongly that we're doing this because we see this as essential to the long-term interest of the port and this proposal as being a very good one for the port and many people in the community, and port community agree with that.

"But, for whatever reason (longshoremen) don't. So they've chosen to directly involve themselves in, essentially, a group that is beyond the ones that employ them."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2962  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2008, 11:31 PM
Helladog's Avatar
Helladog Helladog is offline
Unregistered Loser
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NB
Posts: 1,412
Here's one of the smaller projects in the Valley area...Royal Bank

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2963  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2008, 12:18 AM
kwajo's Avatar
kwajo kwajo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Uptown, Saint John
Posts: 1,686
I know PersonPlaceorThing is on the inside track on that housing development at the corner of Duke and Charlotte, but I thought I'd mention that I noticed two things today that show it is already moving forward. First I was in the Parking Commission and I overheard them saying that they just found out yesterday that they would lose the 100 spaces in that lot. Second, I saw surveyors in the parking lot itself, obviously getting things ready for the architectural design stages.

I like how quickly this seems to be moving along.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2964  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2008, 1:14 AM
Helladog's Avatar
Helladog Helladog is offline
Unregistered Loser
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NB
Posts: 1,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwajo View Post
I know PersonPlaceorThing is on the inside track on that housing development at the corner of Duke and Charlotte, but I thought I'd mention that I noticed two things today that show it is already moving forward. First I was in the Parking Commission and I overheard them saying that they just found out yesterday that they would lose the 100 spaces in that lot. Second, I saw surveyors in the parking lot itself, obviously getting things ready for the architectural design stages.

I like how quickly this seems to be moving along.
For once a project goes ahead fast...almost ahead of the rumour mill...the best kind.

Looks like it's time to build a few parking garages.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2965  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2008, 2:56 AM
random11's Avatar
random11 random11 is offline
Believer in the future
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Saint John
Posts: 199
Politicians come to table for SJ-Digby ferry service
August 01, 2008 - 5:53 pm
By: Jeff Lansing - News 88.9 Staff


DIGBY, NS - The federal and provincial governments have finally come to terms on a new funding agreement for the Saint John-Digby ferry service.

The federal government is contributing 11.1-million dollars. Nova Scotia and New Brunswick are adding 2-million each.

Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency minister Peter McKay says the money will keep the service running for another two years.

"This commitment runs through January 31st, 2011," McKay said. "And demonstrates how the federal government recognizes the importance of this service to the region."

Bay Ferries President Mark MacDonald says funding beyond two years would have been unrealistic.

He says he's delighted for his employees and customers, adding this level of commitment shows governments are taking the issue seriously.

On top of the 15.1 million dollars, ACOA will contribute 1-million dollars for a feasibility study. Ottawa will invest an additional 3-million dollars to improve the Digby wharf.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2966  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2008, 3:02 AM
random11's Avatar
random11 random11 is offline
Believer in the future
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Saint John
Posts: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helladog View Post
For once a project goes ahead fast...almost ahead of the rumour mill...the best kind.

Looks like it's time to build a few parking garages.
I reside on Germain and the lot in question is directly behind the church which is directly (almost) across the street from where I live. This lot is never really full. I don't think losing 100 spaces will be that large an impact. I think the main loss will be in the winter as this parking lot is currently a "snow - ban" lot where residents park their vehicles when a no - parking snow ban has been issued. With the City no longer utilizing the former Sugar Refinery lot as a no - parking 'snow ban lot', the loss of this lot could become an issue. Nevertheless, I support the development.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2967  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2008, 12:26 PM
PostModernPrometheus's Avatar
PostModernPrometheus PostModernPrometheus is offline
Harbour Passage User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Greater Saint John, NB
Posts: 637
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helladog View Post

Looks like it's time to build a few parking garages.

no kidding....at the rate things are going, either we all start driving smartcars, or we're gonna need a lot more parking spaces opening up...



hell, expanding on court's logic, why not turn the lantic sugar site into one great big parking lot for the uptown, charge a huge premium for it and have a few busses running racetrack patterns to king street and back from 9 -5....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2968  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2008, 12:36 PM
PostModernPrometheus's Avatar
PostModernPrometheus PostModernPrometheus is offline
Harbour Passage User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Greater Saint John, NB
Posts: 637
Quote:
Originally Posted by random11 View Post
Politicians come to table for SJ-Digby ferry service


DIGBY, NS - The federal and provincial governments have finally come to terms on a new funding agreement for the Saint John-Digby ferry service.

The federal government is contributing 11.1-million dollars. Nova Scotia and New Brunswick are adding 2-million each.

Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency minister Peter McKay says the money will keep the service running for another two years.

"This commitment runs through January 31st, 2011," McKay said. "And demonstrates how the federal government recognizes the importance of this service to the region."

*sic*


On top of the 15.1 million dollars, ACOA will contribute 1-million dollars for a feasibility study. Ottawa will invest an additional 3-million dollars to improve the Digby wharf.

the last agreement was $2 million each from NB & NS + $4 million from the feds...from oct 2006 - january 2009

the current investment represents a substantial increase beyond that ($19.1 million to extend the service 2 additional years to january 2011, the majority coming from the feds)

the $1 million feasibility study seems to be targetted more towards exploring commercial transportation alternatives if the ferry service should cease to operate.

it seems a bit of a mixed bag, but the shear amount of $ being pumped into this suggests that the service is becoming a priority....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2969  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2008, 12:39 PM
PostModernPrometheus's Avatar
PostModernPrometheus PostModernPrometheus is offline
Harbour Passage User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Greater Saint John, NB
Posts: 637
A sign energy boom has arrivedPublished Saturday August 2nd, 2008


Planning City experiencing steady increase in number of rezoning applications: official
B4Dave MacLean
Telegraph-Journal
SAINT JOHN - A recent increase in the number of rezoning requests coming before common council is just another sign that the energy boom has arrived, says the city's commissioner of planning and development.

Council and the planning advisory committee have seen a steady increase in rezoning applications for residential and commercial development in recent weeks and months, said Ken Forrest. He said the winter and spring are generally the busiest seasons to deal with rezoning applications as developers and contractors prepare for the summer construction season.

"People are usually preparing for the development season before that, so we tend to find that the more significant stuff - if the developers want to do something in the 2008 construction season - they're more likely to be thinking about it in the winter leading into spring," said Forrest. "The summer tends to get more bogged down with minor variance stuff - people doing small projects and realizing they've got an issue.

"There are generally two motivators when it comes to rezoning applications in terms of the timing: there's people thinking about it in the winter and spring to get ready for construction season, and there's the development boom. Overall, we're seeing a significant increase in substantive rezoning applications, so this summer is busier than usual. But it has nothing to do with the cyclical part of the trend. It's just a general increase in volume. Our volumes are up big-time on everything. That's the leading edge of the boom, I would suspect. Otherwise, we would normally expect most of the substantial rezonings to be more in the winter and spring."

Forrest says the planning advisory committee has been swamped with requests in recent weeks. And he doesn't have any reason to believe it will slow down any time soon.

"We're moving from an average of about six cases a week in the past to lately where we're running about 12 to 15 cases a week."All of the current planning stuff is up significantly over background averages and most of that seems to be related to the leading edge of the boom. The applications are much more substantive, as well - a lot of them are major developments."

Among the items common council will deliberate at its meeting next Tuesday (rescheduled because of the New Brunswick Day holiday):

* 2 First St. - The rezoning of a parcel of land (about 1.6 acres) from special Zone 11 to B2 general business in order to allow for offices to be established.

* 40 Mountain View Dr. - The rezoning of a parcel of land (about 5.6 hectares) from one- andtwo-family suburban residential to one- and two-family residential and high-rise multiple residential to allow for the construction of a residential development with a mix of two-family homes and five-storey condominium apartment buildings.

* 20 Alma St. - Amending the Section 39 conditions imposed previously to allow for the construction of a non-profit housing development.

* Blue Rock Court - Amending the Section 39 conditions on a large parcel of land to allow for the development of an apartment complex consisting of three buildings with a total of 55 units, instead of one building with 61 units as previously approved.


from
http://telegraphjournal.canadaeast.com/city/article/372719

Last edited by PostModernPrometheus; Aug 2, 2008 at 2:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2970  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2008, 2:12 PM
PostModernPrometheus's Avatar
PostModernPrometheus PostModernPrometheus is offline
Harbour Passage User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Greater Saint John, NB
Posts: 637
double post

Last edited by PostModernPrometheus; Aug 2, 2008 at 2:46 PM. Reason: double post
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2971  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2008, 3:15 PM
Wrightguy0's Avatar
Wrightguy0 Wrightguy0 is offline
All aboard the Failboat
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by PostModernPrometheus View Post
was just browsing around the net and found a link to some of the renovations the sj theatre co. is making to their new home on princess street...i've been very curious since they started what the final product would look like...looks like it will be a nice addition to the changing face of the area...



1st link shows how the building looked from princess st. before they started..

2nd link - some recent updated photos from the interior & exterior. . . very impressive, imo...



http://www.saintjohntheatrecompany.com/Setting%20the%20Stage.htm


http://www.saintjohntheatrecompany.com/Most%20Recent%20Building%20Update.htm
We open on the 13th with the removal of the structure out front a few days earlier. Or the day of, I'm not quite sure.
__________________
I'f I had a nickel for every time someone presented me with a good idea, well, I'd have a nickel
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2972  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2008, 4:10 PM
davehook_729's Avatar
davehook_729 davehook_729 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 36

Your opinion rocks
Published Thursday July 31st, 2008
Long Wharf Jeweller puts up $10,000 diamond for public's opinion on proposed Irving Oil project
C1
SANDRA DAVIS
Telegraph-Journal

SAINT JOHN - Wayne Smith wants to know how the "silent majority" feels about the proposal to build Irving Oil's corporate headquarters at Long Wharf so badly that he's giving away a $10,000 diamond ring to find out.
...
Ballots will be available in the newspaper beginning Saturday, at W. Smith & Co. and at selected merchants at the City Market and Market Square. Smith is still working out the details of which merchants will have the ballots and the boxes, but will release those details as soon as he has them.



IF ANYONE CAN FIND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE BALLOT, CAN YOU SEND ME THE LINK? THANKS!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2973  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2008, 4:38 PM
random11's Avatar
random11 random11 is offline
Believer in the future
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Saint John
Posts: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrightguy0 View Post
We open on the 13th with the removal of the structure out front a few days earlier. Or the day of, I'm not quite sure.
The photos look great! This is a huge building on Princess Street and I applaud the efforts made to restore it into what will no doubt be an exciting venue. Congrats!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2974  
Old Posted Aug 2, 2008, 9:02 PM
Wrightguy0's Avatar
Wrightguy0 Wrightguy0 is offline
All aboard the Failboat
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 389

The new storefront

We installed the lighting grid from Global TV last weekend, the lights are on in the rehearsal space, we have the flooring down in that room too and the washrooms should be finished by the end of the week.

credit for the photos goes to my father, he has thousands of pictures from 112 princess street that he's taken over the last few years.

Can anyone see that?
__________________
I'f I had a nickel for every time someone presented me with a good idea, well, I'd have a nickel

Last edited by Wrightguy0; Aug 2, 2008 at 9:09 PM. Reason: added picture
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2975  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2008, 12:38 PM
PostModernPrometheus's Avatar
PostModernPrometheus PostModernPrometheus is offline
Harbour Passage User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Greater Saint John, NB
Posts: 637
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrightguy0 View Post

Can anyone see that?
^
nope...not showing...



on a related note, in the hopes that someone here is involved with the marco polo project - i'm unsure what the timelines are in terms of completion (though from the july/08 update below, things seem to be progressing). . . i can remember various places along the waterfront being suggested as a final spot for the ship (including, at least at one point, on or near long wharf being tossed around?), but has there been any kind of final decision made?


www.new-brunswick.net/marcopolo/update5.html
__________________
If you can't convince them, confuse them.

- Harry S Truman
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2976  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2008, 12:49 PM
SJTOKO SJTOKO is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 312


It's still got a long way to go. Correct me if i'm wrong but isn't this ship being built that ugly shed beside the Cruise Ship Terminal? What's keeping the port from ripping that peice of junk down and leasing the land for a fair price... Tons of prime property being wasted..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2977  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2008, 4:26 PM
Wrightguy0's Avatar
Wrightguy0 Wrightguy0 is offline
All aboard the Failboat
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 389
crud, well looks like i'll try again

Nope, westside
__________________
I'f I had a nickel for every time someone presented me with a good idea, well, I'd have a nickel
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2978  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2008, 7:54 PM
Helladog's Avatar
Helladog Helladog is offline
Unregistered Loser
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NB
Posts: 1,412
Here is an e-mail I received last week regarding the Condos on Water St:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2979  
Old Posted Aug 3, 2008, 9:51 PM
PostModernPrometheus's Avatar
PostModernPrometheus PostModernPrometheus is offline
Harbour Passage User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Greater Saint John, NB
Posts: 637
^

gawd those are selling a lot quicker than i thought they would (and i figured they'd go fairly quickly....)
__________________
If you can't convince them, confuse them.

- Harry S Truman
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2980  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2008, 1:22 AM
kwajo's Avatar
kwajo kwajo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Uptown, Saint John
Posts: 1,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by PostModernPrometheus View Post
^

gawd those are selling a lot quicker than i thought they would (and i figured they'd go fairly quickly....)
Hopefully the other tower sells just as quickly, and it proves to more developers that large condo projects Uptown are a sound investment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:47 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.