HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2841  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2008, 2:28 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,075
strong numbers...massive trans
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2842  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2008, 5:25 AM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,889
gas surplus fees don't seem to be shaking these growth patterns...
__________________
Cities are the most extraordinary human creation. They are this phenomenon which has unbelievable capacity to solve problems, to innovate, to invent, to create prosperity, to make change and continually reform. - Ken Greenburg
     
     
  #2843  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2008, 1:29 PM
sdimedru sdimedru is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 741
From the EIA Wikipedia page.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmonton_International_Airport

"Additionally, the ERAA (Edmonton Regional Airports Authority) has decided that Edmonton must become an A380-compatible airport if it wants to see service from the growing Asia-Pacific and mid-Eastern markets. Negotiations are underway to bring YEG's taxiways up to the minimum required width for the super-jumbo."

Yes I know it's wikipedia but.....

Does anyone know if this is happening, or what the required modifications would be?
     
     
  #2844  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2008, 1:31 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,075
^while that wouldnt suprise me in their long term plan...i dont think it is a priority.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2845  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2008, 6:03 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,075
^while that wouldnt suprise me in their long term plan...i dont think it is a priority.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2846  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2008, 8:02 PM
tuffyy's Avatar
tuffyy tuffyy is offline
Sand kicking airport guy.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow.
Posts: 1,750
Only a few of the current taxiways would need to be brought up to this standard.

Dont forget YEG see's the AN-124 and the C-17 on a regular basis.

Aswell as the AN-225 (this past winter.)

A A380 capable gate is something that would need to be looked at long before taxiways, just incase of a diversion or possible A380 service.
     
     
  #2847  
Old Posted Jul 15, 2008, 11:14 PM
dansk's Avatar
dansk dansk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,290
they'll have there new expansion up to code one would think.
     
     
  #2848  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2008, 1:33 PM
sdimedru sdimedru is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 741
anyone know the supposed flight path of the cf18's this morning for the parade? Gonna step out of the office to try and get a look at them, but I want to know which way they'll be coming in from..... (ie. flying along the avenue or streets?)
     
     
  #2849  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2008, 3:14 PM
alexis alexis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuffyy View Post
Only a few of the current taxiways would need to be brought up to this standard.

Dont forget YEG see's the AN-124 and the C-17 on a regular basis.

Aswell as the AN-225 (this past winter.)

A A380 capable gate is something that would need to be looked at long before taxiways, just incase of a diversion or possible A380 service.
I would think it very unlikely that YEG would ever have A380 service. There are what, only 4 airports in the whole of North America, I believe, which they will be operating into, and the cost to bring these up to what is neccessary to handle an A380 runs into the tens if not hundreds of millions.

A C-17 is tiddly compared to an A380...
The wheelbase of an A380 is 30.4m
And AN-124 is 23m
Can;t find the 225 but I think you'll probably find it is less as well.
On top of that you have the overhang required on the taxiways, the A380 is low wing, the rest highwing, which makes a big difference to start with, and that's without the length of their wings. The 225 does have a wider wingspan 88.4m opposed to 80m, but that does not park on the terminals.

The FAA has determined a runway width of 60m and taxiways of 30m, bit narrow that. But then you have to add herdened borders to the taxiways

Then there's the passenger loads...YEG does not operate anything larger than a 767 on a regular passenger schedule, so a jump up to an A380 would need a massive increase in passenger loads...something I doubt you will ever see Edmonton or Calgary get, at least not for the foreseeable future...their catchment areas are just too small.

BUT, if the airport is expanding, which it is, it would certainly be a great idea and a good bit of forethought to at least try and cater for as much as this bohemuth as possible in the planning stages, as I;m sure the costs up front would be far less than 5 or 10 years down the line.

Personally I think we'll never get A380's in, until YEG has a car park than can actually hold all the passengers

Alexis
     
     
  #2850  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2008, 5:10 PM
dansk's Avatar
dansk dansk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,290
I think it is mainly for emergency landings and such that they need to make sure there is equipment. And in the future cargo.
     
     
  #2851  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2008, 5:43 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,598
Building a A380 capable gate is very different from building a true used everyday by A380s gate.

Just as you can service a 747 with a single sky bridge in a pinch, so you can do with a A380 if all the demensions are designed to handle it in an emergency.

I don't think anyone would think that a three bridge gate is coming anytime soon for Edmonton. Do the intercontinental flights even use the two class bridge in the old part of the terminal? I have never seen Calgary's two class bridge actually in use.
     
     
  #2852  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2008, 11:21 PM
tuffyy's Avatar
tuffyy tuffyy is offline
Sand kicking airport guy.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow.
Posts: 1,750
Snowbirds paid YEG a visit today before heading to the airshow.

Also the B-25 ''pacific prowler'' is due to clear customs at YEG either today or tomorrow before heading out.

Kalitta air has another 747-200F due in on friday night also.

There was just a visit from one last week routed MXP-YEG-EWR.
     
     
  #2853  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2008, 11:55 PM
mode mode is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuffyy View Post
Snowbirds paid YEG a visit today before heading to the airshow.

Also the B-25 ''pacific prowler'' is due to clear customs at YEG either today or tomorrow before heading out.

Kalitta air has another 747-200F due in on friday night also.

There was just a visit from one last week routed MXP-YEG-EWR.
Presumably MXP refers to Milan Malpensa Airport. (Sorry to be be the acronym police, but it is a job someone has to do!)
     
     
  #2854  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2008, 11:56 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,598
Quote:
MXP-YEG-EWR.
Now that is an interesting routing.

Did it trade off some cargo or just a gas stop?
     
     
  #2855  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2008, 1:12 AM
alexis alexis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by dansk View Post
I think it is mainly for emergency landings and such that they need to make sure there is equipment. And in the future cargo.
But all that additional cost which will certainly run into the millions, just for emergencies.....

Looking at the A380 order book, only Virgin, Korean, Lufthansa & Air France fly anywhere near Edmonton. Would the European operators be using it to San Fransisco or Los Angeles? So that just leaves Korean...are they planning on operating it to the South/ South East of the US?

In an emergency, providing the aircraft can land, that's the most important thing...if they need to park it on one of the runways then that's a small price to pay.

I used to live in Halifax and on 9/11, one runway was used as a parking area....the big trouble was leaving...each plane had to leave in the order it was parked in, and the passengers didn't want to leave, due to the incredible hospitality..the HIAA used to have photos up of it...quite something seeing a runway almost completely full of parked aircraft!

Alexis
     
     
  #2856  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2008, 1:45 AM
IKAN104's Avatar
IKAN104 IKAN104 is offline
Big Dog
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by mode View Post
Presumably MXP refers to Milan Malpensa Airport. (Sorry to be be the acronym police, but it is a job someone has to do!)
No kidding. I'm always googling airport codes when I hit this thread. I guess we're not all airport junkies on here.
__________________
-There's always a better way-
     
     
  #2857  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2008, 2:35 AM
tuffyy's Avatar
tuffyy tuffyy is offline
Sand kicking airport guy.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow.
Posts: 1,750
^My bad...

Yes it was delivering some rather important valves for a project near Ft.Mac from Italy.

The crew was out of duty time so they overnighted then headed to Newark empty for there next flight.
     
     
  #2858  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2008, 2:35 AM
alexis alexis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuffyy View Post
Snowbirds paid YEG a visit today before heading to the airshow.

Also the B-25 ''pacific prowler'' is due to clear customs at YEG either today or tomorrow before heading out.

Kalitta air has another 747-200F due in on friday night also.

There was just a visit from one last week routed MXP-YEG-EWR.
Saw them very briefly downtown for the Ex parade, along with 2 or 3 CH-146's

Nothing showing on the Kalitta website for a visit into YEG, although the info is normally posted a week or so in advance and tends to be out date by the time comes

Alexis
http://www.kalittaair.com/Schedule.asp
     
     
  #2859  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2008, 3:05 PM
ExcaliburKid's Avatar
ExcaliburKid ExcaliburKid is offline
Derp
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,226
So word on the street is that the Marriot is finally out for tender.
     
     
  #2860  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2008, 5:28 PM
ExcaliburKid's Avatar
ExcaliburKid ExcaliburKid is offline
Derp
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,226
Also, finally got a look at the rendering. It was in black and white, and I didnt get a look at the finish materials, but its a nice design. Clean lines, follows the departures road with a slight curve. Entrance is rounded and this is continued right up to the top floor. I will try and scan it today, if I can.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:48 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.