Quote:
Originally Posted by tuffyy
Only a few of the current taxiways would need to be brought up to this standard.
Dont forget YEG see's the AN-124 and the C-17 on a regular basis.
Aswell as the AN-225 (this past winter.)
A A380 capable gate is something that would need to be looked at long before taxiways, just incase of a diversion or possible A380 service.
|
I would think it very unlikely that YEG would ever have A380 service. There are what, only 4 airports in the whole of North America, I believe, which they will be operating into, and the cost to bring these up to what is neccessary to handle an A380 runs into the tens if not hundreds of millions.
A C-17 is tiddly compared to an A380...
The wheelbase of an A380 is 30.4m
And AN-124 is 23m
Can;t find the 225 but I think you'll probably find it is less as well.
On top of that you have the overhang required on the taxiways, the A380 is low wing, the rest highwing, which makes a big difference to start with, and that's without the length of their wings. The 225 does have a wider wingspan 88.4m opposed to 80m, but that does not park on the terminals.
The FAA has determined a runway width of 60m and taxiways of 30m, bit narrow that. But then you have to add herdened borders to the taxiways
Then there's the passenger loads...YEG does not operate anything larger than a 767 on a regular passenger schedule, so a jump up to an A380 would need a massive increase in passenger loads...something I doubt you will ever see Edmonton or Calgary get, at least not for the foreseeable future...their catchment areas are just too small.
BUT, if the airport is expanding, which it is, it would certainly be a great idea and a good bit of forethought to at least try and cater for as much as this bohemuth as possible in the planning stages, as I;m sure the costs up front would be far less than 5 or 10 years down the line.
Personally I think we'll never get A380's in, until YEG has a car park than can actually hold all the passengers
Alexis