HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4061  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2008, 12:11 AM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by Echo Park View Post
^It's the reason I stopped caring about groundbreaking dates. When it breaks it breaks. Not listening to any developer anymore.

And you didn't credit those flickr photos thoroughly enough, JDRCRASH. You have to credit the flickr username as well cause fflint or KevinFromTexas will spank you.
Yeah, the constant swaying back and forth from optimism and pessimism is starting to get kinda old.

And....fixed! It was actually eric richardson that took those photos.
__________________
Revelation 21:4
     
     
  #4062  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2008, 2:21 AM
BrandonJXN's Avatar
BrandonJXN BrandonJXN is offline
Ascension
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 5,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH View Post
That's nice.

But regardless, notice how I said "I THINK". I've learned to properly use the right vocabulary for people to understand what i'm saying.
Your mother must be enthralled.

Grand Ave said during it's last delay that it was going to break ground late summer. I'm like Echo; I never mark the date on my calender of the groundbreaking of a project because it RARELY breaks ground on the day they say (the Ritz being a exception). If a projects breaks woo hoo. If not boo hoo.
__________________
Washed Out
     
     
  #4063  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2008, 6:24 AM
Affrojuice Affrojuice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 47
I feel this author is being hasty in saying the downtown renaissance didn't happen. It is happening slowly everyday, things as authentic as what is happening downtown takes time. Just because the streets of downtown are not full of rich westsiders doesn't mean its a failure.

Downtown not the center of it all
The residential boom many expected in an area with 'rough edges' didn't happen. Now, condo prices are skidding.
By Peter Y. Hong, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
March 13, 2008
Downtown Los Angeles has seen a much-heralded revival in the last few years, with thousands of people moving in and a flock of new restaurants and upscale stores opening to serve them. Attractions such as Staples Center and the Nokia Theatre are helping support premium eateries and a lively club scene.

But there are signs that downtown's residential boom is slowing, if not stalling out altogether.

Prices of condominiums, which dominate the downtown market, have fallen more sharply here than in Los Angeles and Orange counties overall, according to DataQuick Information Systems. More than one-third of the residential projects approved by city officials have been sidelined.

Downtown's defenders say the area simply is suffering from the same housing slump that has slowed sales to a crawl and depressed prices across the country.

But some real estate analysts believe downtown's housing troubles run deeper. They say developers and planners miscalculated its appeal as a residential community, leading them to build far too many projects for the demand.

As a result, the housing market downtown could fall more sharply and take longer to recover than it might in established residential areas.

"There was great hype," said Fred Sands, a veteran real estate broker who sold his namesake firm and now invests in commercial properties. "There was sort of a mania that fed on itself. People said downtown was the future, and young people bought into it. Some of those buildings should not have been built."

Downtown developers counter that argument, saying there are too many people working downtown and not enough places for them to live. Traffic gets worse every year, they point out, which will drive up demand for housing closer to where people work.

"I think it is absolutely inevitable more and more people will live in downtown-type locations," saidJames A. Osterling, a developer and the former chief financial officer of Shea Homes. "I don't think [the real estate slump] is going to kill off downtown."

Home sales data, however, suggest that the downtown market is faring worse than the region overall.

The median sales price for homes sold downtown, almost all of which are condos, fell to $497,360 for the fourth quarter of last year, 16% below the peak reached in early 2007, according to DataQuick.

By comparison, condo prices fell 7% from their peak in Los Angeles County during the same period and 11% from their peak in Orange County, DataQuick said. The median sales price for condos in both counties in the fourth quarter of 2007 was $410,000.

Downtown's residential expansion began in 1999, when the city relaxed parking, zoning and seismic safety rules, making it easier for developers to convert aged office buildings into apartments. The wide-open layouts and spare look of the lofts, with concrete floors and exposed pipes, quickly proved popular with an adventuresome crowd.

Within a few years, developers began to offer units in the rehabbed buildings for sale, and luxury buildings were constructed from the ground up, with rooftop pools and sky-high prices.

So far, however, demand has not kept pace with ambitions, as several downtown boosters concede.

Developers of nearly completed condominium buildings have been pulling out all the stops to move their units. Until recently, one complex offered to lease a Mini Cooper car for buyers. It has now upped the ante: $60,000 in upgrades and discounts. Another developer was giving away paid vacations at a Mexican resort to loft purchasers.

Despite declining values, many downtown lofts are still listed for sale at more than $600,000, comparable to houses in easy commuting distance to downtown.

Osterling, who is developing a residential project in Chinatown, is well aware of the challenge. Though he calls himself "a huge believer in the renaissance in downtown Los Angeles," he likes his Altadena house just fine.

If he did downsize, "I'd probably get a condo in Pasadena," he said. "It has the theater, restaurants and culture without the rough edges of downtown."

Real estate experts say those rough edges -- including pockets of homeless people and areas that still appear run-down -- remain an obstacle.

Sands said he was seriously considering buying apartment buildings in the downtown warehouse district three years ago. He said he changed his mind after seeing "an attractive young woman pushing an infant in a stroller, with winos all around her."

Paul Park, 34, a marketing manager for an architecture and design firm, said he and his partner considered moving their office and residence downtown several years ago. Instead, they set up an office in West Hollywood and remained in their Hollywood house.

Park said he found the well-publicized new night life and shopping downtown wasn't as abundant as he would like.

"We weren't ready to homestead," he said.

Architect Ken Lewis and his wife, Patricia, moved downtown in 2001 to live closer to work and join what they saw as an exciting urban revival.

But after two years of living in a converted office building near City Hall, they abandoned downtown for suburban Burbank.

"I really needed a garage," said Lewis, 51, an avid woodworker. He added: "Patricia really loves to garden; she wanted a small yard."

USC professor Peter Gordon said the loft movement was an outgrowth of the flood of high-rise office buildings that shot up in Bunker Hill in the 1980s.

The new skyscrapers rented at rates low enough to draw tenants from the older buildings downtown, emptying them out. Developers saw an opportunity to convert these vacant, often run-down office spaces into lofts.

It's a good idea that might make sense on paper, Gordon said, but they were trying to create a market where one didn't exist.

"There's a sort of faddishness" to the demand for downtown lofts without doors on the bedrooms and bathrooms or dedicated parking spaces, Gordon said. "I don't think it extends deeply."

He anticipates a long period of high vacancies and deeply discounted rents for downtown's loft buildings.

Despite skeptics such as Gordon, downtown has seen a big increase in its residential population. According to the downtown Business Improvement District, the total has grown 42% in the last three years, based on a formula that figures 1.6 persons per housing unit.

The city, using U.S. census data, estimates more modest growth of 20% downtown from 2000 to 2006. But that still outpaced L.A.'s growth of 8% for that period.

"We have created a desirable place to live," said Carol E. Schatz, president of the Central City Assn., a downtown business advocacy group.

Schatz said slowing condo sales downtown simply reflected the national real estate downturn.

"As the whole region comes out of the downturn, we will speed ahead," she said. "There's no other place you can go to the opera, a Lakers game or a world-class concert" in the Los Angeles area, she said.

Downtown's growth coincided with the creation of several landmark developments, such as Staples Center and the Walt Disney Concert Hall. Coming up: the Grand Avenue project, with its hotels, offices and condos in the Civic Center. The recently opened Nokia Theatre near the Los Angeles Convention Center marked the first phase of L.A. Live, an ambitious hotel, retail and residential complex.

Even skeptics like Sands see South Park, the area around Staples Center, as promising. "South Park eventually is going to be great," Sands said.

James Atkins, whose development firm, Portland, Ore.-based Williams, Dame & Atkins, has built two major projects downtown, is bullish on the area but acknowledges that its transformation is not complete.

From his developments elsewhere, Atkins has learned that younger people will live in edgy new neighborhoods. But a neighborhood becomes firmly established when older, more affluent people are willing to move in -- a sign that the area's safety and amenities match that of the suburbs where they'd been living.

Downtown needs even more restaurants, stores and parks for that to happen, Atkins said. "When the Westside empty-nesters arrive, that's when we'll see the real jump in the market," he said.

He added: "That process took 20 years in Portland."
     
     
  #4064  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2008, 6:41 AM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Affrojuice View Post
Osterling, who is developing a residential project in Chinatown, is well aware of the challenge. Though he calls himself "a huge believer in the renaissance in downtown Los Angeles," he likes his Altadena house just fine. If he did downsize, "I'd probably get a condo in Pasadena," he said. "It has the theater, restaurants and culture without the rough edges of downtown."

Sands said he was seriously considering buying apartment buildings in the downtown warehouse district three years ago. He said he changed his mind after seeing "an attractive young woman pushing an infant in a stroller, with winos all around her."

Paul Park, 34, a marketing manager for an architecture and design firm, said he and his partner considered moving their office and residence downtown several years ago. Instead, they set up an office in West Hollywood and remained in their Hollywood house.

Park said he found the well-publicized new night life and shopping downtown wasn't as abundant as he would like. "We weren't ready to homestead," he said.

Architect Ken Lewis and his wife, Patricia, moved downtown in 2001 to live closer to work and join what they saw as an exciting urban revival. But after two years of living in a converted office building near City Hall, they abandoned downtown for suburban Burbank. "I really needed a garage," said Lewis, 51, an avid woodworker. He added: "Patricia really loves to garden; she wanted a small yard."


These better not be the type of ppl who, at the same time, will claim they like the grittiness of Broadway & the edginess of the OBD. The type of ppl who will say they like the authenticity of a sketchy urban experience, & will criticize the city & devlprs for making things too clean & "sterile", but who eventually move on & out, to hoods like Burbank or pasadena.

BTW, the story comes with a set of pics of a real estate agent based in DT who isn't even mentioned in the article, & who says the "crash has left him with virtually no business". IOW, the article has a kind of last minute, pieced together quality about it.
     
     
  #4065  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2008, 6:55 AM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,702
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladowntowner View Post
I can remember before L.A. Live was even a vision. Before or around when Staples was proposed and just after the Convention Center expansion was completed - about 14 years ago. I'm talking about the blocks where L.A. Live is now rising, even before they were a massive expanse of surface parking lots for Staples. Those few blocks were much worse than the few blocks north of L.A. Live of which you speak currently are. I can recall a whole neighborhood of old ramshackle apartments, hordes of prostitutes plying their wares, rats as big as cats and trash strewn all about where 4 and 5-star hotels and luxury condos are now rising. If we can keep our economy afloat once we (hopefully) emerge from the current recession, if we can devise another bubble of some sort - what you are hoping for will happen, in time.
I recall the area south of pico Blvd & Fig, before the new wing of the convention ctr had been built in the 1990s. It used to be full of trashy old bldgs & was very depressing. I still remember driving by there right after everything had been torn down & it was like the difference between night & day. Literally. There was sunshine pouring down on an area that formerly had been full of shadows cast by flop house bldgs.

I think cleaning up the hood will be even more important if we enter another lull in devlpt, where nothing new will be built for yrs & yrs. At the same time, things like landscaped borders can be placed around parking lots. Example: the site of the parkfifth tower. So if the hood can't be improved with new bldgs & major renovation, in the meantime at least make it less fugly & dead looking.
     
     
  #4066  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2008, 7:02 AM
DJM19 DJM19 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,542
I think already existant influx of residents will stabilize the area at least an encourage street improvements and other such infrastructure progress. Which in turn will re-encourage development. Thats IF the area really does become stagnant in construction.
     
     
  #4067  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2008, 7:51 AM
milquetoast's Avatar
milquetoast milquetoast is offline
L O S A N G E L E S
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Henderson NV
Posts: 165
Quote:
"That process took 20 years in Portland."
Typical L. A.Times negative sensationalism, and Los Angeles is not Portland
     
     
  #4068  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2008, 8:29 AM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
Inveterate Angeleno
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,652
Concerto

March 11, 2008


From Flickr, by ericrichardson
__________________
“To tell a story is inescapably to take a moral stance.”

— Jerome Bruner
     
     
  #4069  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2008, 11:31 AM
DowntownCharlieBrown's Avatar
DowntownCharlieBrown DowntownCharlieBrown is offline
Good Grief
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Downtown, Orange County, L.A.
Posts: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Affrojuice View Post

Downtown not the center of it all
The residential boom many expected in an area with 'rough edges' didn't happen.

Despite skeptics such as Gordon, downtown has seen a big increase in its residential population. According to the downtown Business Improvement District, the total has grown 42% in the last three years, based on a formula that figures 1.6 persons per housing unit.

The city, using U.S. census data, estimates more modest growth of 20% downtown from 2000 to 2006. But that still outpaced L.A.'s growth of 8% for that period.
These reporters...

He writes about how "the renaissance that never happened" and "its all doom and gloom for Downtown LA" then throws out that the population of DT increased 20% over the last six years, and it increased 46% in the last 3 years like it's not significant. Well 20% when the city average is 8% is significant, and 46% is very significant.

I guess I thought with all the adaptive-reuse, completed construction, projects under construction, huge population increase, drug dealers and users removed from open view, and significantly lower office vacancy rates, meant that DT was changing. I guess I was wrong now that the LA Times straightened me out.


Quote:
Sands said he was seriously considering buying apartment buildings in the downtown warehouse district three years ago. He said he changed his mind after seeing "an attractive young woman pushing an infant in a stroller, with winos all around her."

With the death of DT nothing left to do but become a wino and chase women with small children.



(Wino - Do they still use that term)

Last edited by DowntownCharlieBrown; Mar 13, 2008 at 5:59 PM.
     
     
  #4070  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2008, 2:46 PM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by Affrojuice View Post
I feel this author is being hasty in saying the downtown renaissance didn't happen. It is happening slowly everyday, things as authentic as what is happening downtown takes time. Just because the streets of downtown are not full of rich westsiders doesn't mean its a failure.

Downtown not the center of it all
The residential boom many expected in an area with 'rough edges' didn't happen. Now, condo prices are skidding.
By Peter Y. Hong, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
March 13, 2008
Downtown Los Angeles has seen a much-heralded revival in the last few years, with thousands of people moving in and a flock of new restaurants and upscale stores opening to serve them. Attractions such as Staples Center and the Nokia Theatre are helping support premium eateries and a lively club scene.

But there are signs that downtown's residential boom is slowing, if not stalling out altogether.

Prices of condominiums, which dominate the downtown market, have fallen more sharply here than in Los Angeles and Orange counties overall, according to DataQuick Information Systems. More than one-third of the residential projects approved by city officials have been sidelined.

Downtown's defenders say the area simply is suffering from the same housing slump that has slowed sales to a crawl and depressed prices across the country.

But some real estate analysts believe downtown's housing troubles run deeper. They say developers and planners miscalculated its appeal as a residential community, leading them to build far too many projects for the demand.

As a result, the housing market downtown could fall more sharply and take longer to recover than it might in established residential areas.

"There was great hype," said Fred Sands, a veteran real estate broker who sold his namesake firm and now invests in commercial properties. "There was sort of a mania that fed on itself. People said downtown was the future, and young people bought into it. Some of those buildings should not have been built."

Downtown developers counter that argument, saying there are too many people working downtown and not enough places for them to live. Traffic gets worse every year, they point out, which will drive up demand for housing closer to where people work.

"I think it is absolutely inevitable more and more people will live in downtown-type locations," saidJames A. Osterling, a developer and the former chief financial officer of Shea Homes. "I don't think [the real estate slump] is going to kill off downtown."

Home sales data, however, suggest that the downtown market is faring worse than the region overall.

The median sales price for homes sold downtown, almost all of which are condos, fell to $497,360 for the fourth quarter of last year, 16% below the peak reached in early 2007, according to DataQuick.

By comparison, condo prices fell 7% from their peak in Los Angeles County during the same period and 11% from their peak in Orange County, DataQuick said. The median sales price for condos in both counties in the fourth quarter of 2007 was $410,000.

Downtown's residential expansion began in 1999, when the city relaxed parking, zoning and seismic safety rules, making it easier for developers to convert aged office buildings into apartments. The wide-open layouts and spare look of the lofts, with concrete floors and exposed pipes, quickly proved popular with an adventuresome crowd.

Within a few years, developers began to offer units in the rehabbed buildings for sale, and luxury buildings were constructed from the ground up, with rooftop pools and sky-high prices.

So far, however, demand has not kept pace with ambitions, as several downtown boosters concede.

Developers of nearly completed condominium buildings have been pulling out all the stops to move their units. Until recently, one complex offered to lease a Mini Cooper car for buyers. It has now upped the ante: $60,000 in upgrades and discounts. Another developer was giving away paid vacations at a Mexican resort to loft purchasers.

Despite declining values, many downtown lofts are still listed for sale at more than $600,000, comparable to houses in easy commuting distance to downtown.

Osterling, who is developing a residential project in Chinatown, is well aware of the challenge. Though he calls himself "a huge believer in the renaissance in downtown Los Angeles," he likes his Altadena house just fine.

If he did downsize, "I'd probably get a condo in Pasadena," he said. "It has the theater, restaurants and culture without the rough edges of downtown."

Real estate experts say those rough edges -- including pockets of homeless people and areas that still appear run-down -- remain an obstacle.

Sands said he was seriously considering buying apartment buildings in the downtown warehouse district three years ago. He said he changed his mind after seeing "an attractive young woman pushing an infant in a stroller, with winos all around her."

Paul Park, 34, a marketing manager for an architecture and design firm, said he and his partner considered moving their office and residence downtown several years ago. Instead, they set up an office in West Hollywood and remained in their Hollywood house.

Park said he found the well-publicized new night life and shopping downtown wasn't as abundant as he would like.

"We weren't ready to homestead," he said.

Architect Ken Lewis and his wife, Patricia, moved downtown in 2001 to live closer to work and join what they saw as an exciting urban revival.

But after two years of living in a converted office building near City Hall, they abandoned downtown for suburban Burbank.

"I really needed a garage," said Lewis, 51, an avid woodworker. He added: "Patricia really loves to garden; she wanted a small yard."

USC professor Peter Gordon said the loft movement was an outgrowth of the flood of high-rise office buildings that shot up in Bunker Hill in the 1980s.

The new skyscrapers rented at rates low enough to draw tenants from the older buildings downtown, emptying them out. Developers saw an opportunity to convert these vacant, often run-down office spaces into lofts.

It's a good idea that might make sense on paper, Gordon said, but they were trying to create a market where one didn't exist.

"There's a sort of faddishness" to the demand for downtown lofts without doors on the bedrooms and bathrooms or dedicated parking spaces, Gordon said. "I don't think it extends deeply."

He anticipates a long period of high vacancies and deeply discounted rents for downtown's loft buildings.

Despite skeptics such as Gordon, downtown has seen a big increase in its residential population. According to the downtown Business Improvement District, the total has grown 42% in the last three years, based on a formula that figures 1.6 persons per housing unit.

The city, using U.S. census data, estimates more modest growth of 20% downtown from 2000 to 2006. But that still outpaced L.A.'s growth of 8% for that period.

"We have created a desirable place to live," said Carol E. Schatz, president of the Central City Assn., a downtown business advocacy group.

Schatz said slowing condo sales downtown simply reflected the national real estate downturn.

"As the whole region comes out of the downturn, we will speed ahead," she said. "There's no other place you can go to the opera, a Lakers game or a world-class concert" in the Los Angeles area, she said.

Downtown's growth coincided with the creation of several landmark developments, such as Staples Center and the Walt Disney Concert Hall. Coming up: the Grand Avenue project, with its hotels, offices and condos in the Civic Center. The recently opened Nokia Theatre near the Los Angeles Convention Center marked the first phase of L.A. Live, an ambitious hotel, retail and residential complex.

Even skeptics like Sands see South Park, the area around Staples Center, as promising. "South Park eventually is going to be great," Sands said.

James Atkins, whose development firm, Portland, Ore.-based Williams, Dame & Atkins, has built two major projects downtown, is bullish on the area but acknowledges that its transformation is not complete.

From his developments elsewhere, Atkins has learned that younger people will live in edgy new neighborhoods. But a neighborhood becomes firmly established when older, more affluent people are willing to move in -- a sign that the area's safety and amenities match that of the suburbs where they'd been living.

Downtown needs even more restaurants, stores and parks for that to happen, Atkins said. "When the Westside empty-nesters arrive, that's when we'll see the real jump in the market," he said.

He added: "That process took 20 years in Portland."
Tell him to "ASK THE MAYOR"
__________________
Revelation 21:4
     
     
  #4071  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2008, 2:49 PM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by milquetoast View Post
Typical L. A.Times negative sensationalism, and Los Angeles is not Portland
THANK YOU!!!
__________________
Revelation 21:4
     
     
  #4072  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2008, 2:51 PM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by DowntownCharlieBrown View Post
These reporters...

He writes about how "the renaissance that never happened' and "its all doom and gloom for Downtown LA" then throws out that the population of DT increase 20% over the last six years, and it increase 46% in the last 3 years like it not significant. Well 20% when the city average is 8% is significant, and 46% is very significant.

I guess I thought with all the adaptive-reuse, completed construction, projects under construction, huge population increase, drug dealers and users removed from open view, and significantly lower office vacancy rates, meant DT was changing. I guess I was wrong now that the LA Times straightened me out.





With the death of DT nothing left to do but become a wino and chase women with small children.

(Wino - Do they still use that term)
You don't actually believe this crap, do you?
__________________
Revelation 21:4
     
     
  #4073  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2008, 9:30 PM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,891
you dont need to quote long articles to post one liners.

to the article. Useless crap. I wrote a letter to the times. I encourage everyone else to do the same. Its getting retarded, with all the negative reporting. For example, how could they only have a 30 word brief on the metro long range plan? thats a huge development in the history of Los Angeles yet only a brief mention. jesus, what happened to our great paper.
     
     
  #4074  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2008, 11:12 PM
RuFFy's Avatar
RuFFy RuFFy is offline
FlyyyFALiiFe
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 364
It's owned by the Tribune Company. I hope someone that actually is in LA and likes LA buys it.
     
     
  #4075  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2008, 1:23 AM
ladowntowner ladowntowner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: DTLA
Posts: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDRCRASH View Post
You don't actually believe this crap, do you?
Uhm... it's called sarcasm, I think...
__________________

Nice!!!
     
     
  #4076  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2008, 1:55 AM
San Marino Guy San Marino Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 31
Why can't they write something positive about Downtown such as how well South Park is doing? Once LA Live Phase 2 opens up this year, we'll probably see a lot happen in that area.
     
     
  #4077  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2008, 2:58 AM
DTLA's Avatar
DTLA DTLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Arcata, CA
Posts: 84
I don't know if someone has already mentioned this, but I heard on the news that the Rosslyn Hotel may be converted to lofts.
     
     
  #4078  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2008, 3:07 AM
Echo Park Echo Park is offline
California goth
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: cardboard box on skid row
Posts: 1,745
Why can't the Times just write about puppies and gumdrops and rainbows? Get a grip, guys. they do a pretty decent and objective job of covering downtown. that article misrepresents the facts but they usually have someone much better (cara mia dimassa) covering the downtown beat.
     
     
  #4079  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2008, 4:17 AM
JDRCRASH JDRCRASH is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Gabriel Valley
Posts: 8,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladowntowner View Post
Uhm... it's called sarcasm, I think...
Yeah, but seriously; we need to look at the positive perspective.


Consider this paragraph I found from www.wikipedia.com when I searched "Downtown Los Angeles":

Quote:
The residential population of Downtown LA has boomed since 2005, with a 20% jump in two years (2005-07) to 28,878 residents.[2] This number surpassed previous estimates and, with units under construction, pushes the estimated Downtown population to more than 40,000 by the end of 2008 instead of 2015, the previous target milestone.
__________________
Revelation 21:4
     
     
  #4080  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2008, 4:57 AM
San Marino Guy San Marino Guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 31
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:29 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.