HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4061  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2008, 6:28 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,595

I don't know Projects, that's kind of spooky. I've been having a lot of strange gut feelings lately, that we're going to be getting an MLB team in the fairly near future,say the next 5 to 7 years. Also, for some reason I've run into several people lately who have talked fairly openly about a strong rumor mill circulating, about an MLB team for the area. I hope you're Bluffdale dream isn't prophetic, as far as a location goes.
     
     
  #4062  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2008, 6:37 PM
Viperlord's Avatar
Viperlord Viperlord is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,900
a new project...


     
     
  #4063  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2008, 6:40 PM
urbanboy urbanboy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Downtown Salt Lake City
Posts: 2,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLC Projects View Post
And I remember getting on this forum and OMG all you guys were sooooo pissed. I thought both Urbanboy and Comrade were going to have heart attacks. But can you blame them? Even I was upset.
     
     
  #4064  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2008, 6:57 PM
urbanboy urbanboy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Downtown Salt Lake City
Posts: 2,120
I think a tower in the 40-50 range could look just fine in our skyline, depending on the design. I think the reason why aesthetically the Wells Fargo wouldn't look good at that hight is because of the width of the building, whereas a more slender building might work.

Here is an example, disregard the location, this is only to illustrate my point:

     
     
  #4065  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2008, 7:22 PM
alphawolf alphawolf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: les bois / Watertown / Ft. Drum
Posts: 702
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanboy View Post
I think a tower in the 40-50 range could look just fine in our skyline, depending on the design. I think the reason why aesthetically the Wells Fargo wouldn't look good at that hight is because of the width of the building, whereas a more slender building might work.
So maybe a 200ft progression?
     
     
  #4066  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2008, 7:24 PM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,621
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLC Projects View Post
Ok guys...this is kind of off subject. But last night I had a crazy dream. I had a dream that Salt Lake was finally getting a Major League Baseball team. But the team wanted a NEW stadium. So guess where they ended up building it?...And no it wasn't sandy. It was far worst then Sandy. Bluffdale. Yes that's right freaking Bluffdale. It was going on the corner of 14400 South and 2700 West. If any of you guys have even been out there all there is are farm lands and big houses on 5 acre lots. The stadium itself was very nice. But having it in Bluffdale was a joke.
And I remember getting on this forum and OMG all you guys were sooooo pissed. I thought both Urbanboy and Comrade were going to have heart attacks. But can you blame them? Even I was upset. Talk about the worst place to put a stadium.
Anyways thought I would share that with you all. Thank god it was only a dream.
haha, if that happened, I actually think I would have a heart attack.
     
     
  #4067  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2008, 8:11 PM
SLCforme SLCforme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 403
yeah, count me in on a heart attack for that one too. And I agree with Comrade about a gradual progression in the height of our skyline. A city really doesn't have to have a lot of height in order to be a dense, attractive, lively city (Vancouver comes to mind). However, if it was placed just right a 600-700 ft building could look pretty good in our skyline, giving it a central point of focus tapering off to every side, ala Urbanboy's sketch on that newspaper photo.
__________________
"Orthodoxy means not thinking-not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness."
George Orwell, "1984"
     
     
  #4068  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2008, 8:11 PM
goldcntry's Avatar
goldcntry goldcntry is offline
West bench livin'
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Daybreak (So. Jordan), UT
Posts: 791
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrade Reynolds View Post
haha, if that happened, I actually think I would have a heart attack.
Well...

They could always put it in Wood's Cross...

__________________
Giant Meteor 2024
Just end it all already.
     
     
  #4069  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2008, 8:54 PM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,621
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanboy View Post
I think a tower in the 40-50 range could look just fine in our skyline, depending on the design. I think the reason why aesthetically the Wells Fargo wouldn't look good at that hight is because of the width of the building, whereas a more slender building might work.

Here is an example, disregard the location, this is only to illustrate my point:

See, I'm still not feeling it. While I would definitely not hate the idea of a 50-story tower being built, I'm not entirely bummed we're only getting 20-30 story buildings right now.

As SLCforme said, it's more important to build density than it is height at this stage. Add in a few 30-35 story towers and it contrasts well with that glass tower.
     
     
  #4070  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2008, 8:57 PM
urbanboy urbanboy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Downtown Salt Lake City
Posts: 2,120


Sure, we do need more density. look at all those surface parking lots in the lower left hand corner of the photograph.
     
     
  #4071  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2008, 11:13 PM
RC14's Avatar
RC14 RC14 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrade Reynolds View Post
And just to give you an example, with a bit of guessing, here's the Wells Fargo Center at about 45-stories:



To me, it ruins the skyline even more. Now if all the other towers were in the 25-35 range, it wouldn't look too bad. However, to have the tallest 20+ stories taller than the 2nd tallest? Not good (unless we're talking a skyline with towers in their 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s and 80-stories -- than a 100 story tower wouldn't look too out of place).
I was going to argue with you but I changed my mind in mid post.
However i still don't think a 50story building would be too much of a jump, I think it might encourage other taller buildings.

I would like a skyline where when first seen focuses your eyes to the 25-30 story buildings, then in the back ground you would have your 500-700ft towers and then one or two 700+ foot buildings in the distance. I don't know if I'm explaining this very well?
     
     
  #4072  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2008, 11:40 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,595
Something like the Seattle Skyline RC14. I've always admired the Seattle skyline for the it's variety of building heights. The different heights makes a striking visual prensentation.


forrestcroce.com

Last edited by delts145; Mar 11, 2008 at 1:34 PM.
     
     
  #4073  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2008, 11:49 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,595
This is really interesting and somewhat exciting to me. It would seem that 300 West is turning into downtown's new chic address. I hadn't expected the transformation to happen so quickly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viperlord View Post
a new project...


     
     
  #4074  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2008, 12:13 AM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,621
Quote:
Originally Posted by RC14 View Post
I was going to argue with you but I changed my mind in mid post.
However i still don't think a 50story building would be too much of a jump, I think it might encourage other taller buildings.

I would like a skyline where when first seen focuses your eyes to the 25-30 story buildings, then in the back ground you would have your 500-700ft towers and then one or two 700+ foot buildings in the distance. I don't know if I'm explaining this very well?
Like I said, I wouldn't be opposed -- or even pissed -- to the idea of a 50-story building. However, I think it's more important Salt Lake get more density downtown and more variety in heights before the city builds a tower of that size.

Here's Hearst Tower in Charlotte added to the Salt Lake skyline (46 stories).



It doesn't look horrible, but the building does look out of place. In fact, it actually makes the other buildings look smaller than they really are. It kind of reminds me of Omaha's skyline, though obviously, on a whole, SLC has taller buildings.



I just think the skyline would look better if we had a few 500 foot towers and then moved up into a couple 600 foot towers. But to have one 650 foot tower among 420 or less? It sets the balance off worse than what we have already.
     
     
  #4075  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2008, 12:30 AM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,621
Now let's say the skyline looked like this...



We're doin' good. There is a tallest, but it doesn't look out of place and the skyline actually balances out very well.
     
     
  #4076  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2008, 12:42 AM
urbanboy urbanboy is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Downtown Salt Lake City
Posts: 2,120
I made some changes:

[IMG][/IMG]
     
     
  #4077  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2008, 12:51 AM
airhero airhero is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 968
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrade Reynolds View Post
Now let's say the skyline looked like this...



We're doin' good. There is a tallest, but it doesn't look out of place and the skyline actually balances out very well.
I like it. I agree that Salt Lake needs more density, eventually getting taller and taller as we move on. I mean, as of now, I don't think we're ready for a 45 story building. I think the density should come first. That would be my number one priority when it comes to the skyline of Salt Lake. It might take a while before we get a definable new tallest, but sometimes we have to be patient, we can't always get everything we want when we want it, although I wish that was the case.
     
     
  #4078  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2008, 1:11 AM
T-Mac's Avatar
T-Mac T-Mac is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bountiful, Utah
Posts: 1,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post
This is really interesting and somewhat exciting to me. It would seem that 300 West is turning into downtown's new chic address. I hadn't expected the transformation to happen so quickly.
Delts, I agree taht this could become a new chic address. However, the Marmalade seems dormant. There has been no activity at the site for a few months now. I would say since November. They have cleared the lot and dumped some gravel. I e-mailed them as to the hold-up but have yet to receive a response and that was a week ago.
     
     
  #4079  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2008, 2:59 AM
Viperlord's Avatar
Viperlord Viperlord is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,900
I stumbled across this cool site...

check it out..We should get one

photos courtesy of the site below

http://www.flyingsensors.com





















could you imagine the fun we could have with one of those
lol

Check out more on the CCC center page...
     
     
  #4080  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2008, 3:24 AM
i-215's Avatar
i-215 i-215 is offline
Exit 298
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Inland Empire (CA)
Posts: 3,486
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLC Projects View Post
Ok guys...this is kind of off subject. But last night I had a crazy dream. I had a dream that Salt Lake was finally getting a Major League Baseball team. But the team wanted a NEW stadium. So guess where they ended up building it?...And no it wasn't sandy. It was far worst then Sandy. Bluffdale. Yes that's right freaking Bluffdale. It was going on the corner of 14400 South and 2700 West. If any of you guys have even been out there all there is are farm lands and big houses on 5 acre lots. The stadium itself was very nice. But having it in Bluffdale was a joke.
And I remember getting on this forum and OMG all you guys were sooooo pissed. I thought both Urbanboy and Comrade were going to have heart attacks. But can you blame them? Even I was upset. Talk about the worst place to put a stadium.
Anyways thought I would share that with you all. Thank god it was only a dream.


That's AWESOME!!!
__________________
I've stopped caring. Good luck, America
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:41 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.