Quote:
Originally Posted by ozone
Well when it was first proposed I remember that a lot of you guys were saying that the design sucked. It's true that the site is visable -being in the "Civic Center" and all---but then again this council doesn't have a steller record in preventing bad design. I wonder if Saca is asking for city money? Maybe too many just do not want to waste time with Saca anymore? (Maybe thinking here we go again with this guy who can't deliever on his promises.)
|
Saca is asking for part city property.
There's no denying that the Metropolitan could use some design tweaking. But good gravy, these are the same people who gave us the garage at 621CM (and the office tower at 621 for that matter), the Sheraton, 800J (which while i don't think is offensive, is no better than the Metropolitan)...
The council members are more concerned with their own personal view of the Capitol dome (which I'm sure more than a couple apsire to work in), than they are about the overall economic outlook of the CBD.
Tweak the design if they want to (i have no problem with that).. But they're intent on cropping the Metropolitan's height and in the process throwing out the current Capitol view protection corrdior. Basically they now want to reinvent the wheel at a time when Sacramento needs to see one of these projects get off the ground.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozone
Whatever is the case I think the council is made up of mostly small town people who have hung around long enough to end up councilmembers of a moderately large city. They are in over their collective heads.
|
I agree 100% and unfortunately instead of leaders we end up with recycled neighborhood association members such as Fargo, Cohn, and Fong (to name a few) who continue to push their parochial neighborhood political views, instead of looking out for the greater good of the city.