Quote:
Originally Posted by econgrad
Not sure what you mean yet, but the light rail stations here are being used during the day for people to avoid traffic on highway 50 and 80. People who live outside of downtown and work in downtown. I know many RT employees, and you will hear from them, especially after a few drinks, that they will never ever ride the RT because it is so dangerous..there is absolutely no help in time if you get into trouble. At the same token, I have friends who use the light rail, and have not had any problems, but do admit there being a serious issue with bad elements, especially hanging out in the stations.
|
What I mean is there a case of light rail improving the streetscape and street life? Is there an example of a thriving district on a light rail dominated urban core street? And I mean one dedicated to light rail - not one that also has auto traffic or a heavy rail subway. They could have chosen a variety of streets but they wanted to attract riders to K Street. I don't think this decision was made solely because of the desire to move commuters. I think there was a specific desire to move them to K Street under the assumption that it would help revitalize the area. I'm sure other factors including no disruption of vehicular traffic were also considered, but more people on K Street certainly was part of the equation.
If such an example exists, what is different about it that has produced a different result?