HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1681  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2007, 1:17 AM
jaysfan99 jaysfan99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 260
NO! We are not talking about building a 85 or 60 floor structure. A 40 floor building is not that tall. We already have a 27 floor building (Hallmark Place), a taller building should be built. Talking about it is a start.




Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalreg View Post
Something like this could be built quite easily. But would it not be better to have two 20 floor stuctures instead? Maybe fill in the gaps in the skyline we already have.

Last edited by jaysfan99; Jun 7, 2007 at 1:30 AM.
     
     
  #1682  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2007, 1:37 AM
CCF's Avatar
CCF CCF is offline
Canadian Urbanite
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Across Canada
Posts: 3,530
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaysfan99 View Post
NO! We are not talking about building a 85 or 60 floor structure. A 40 floor building is not that tall. We already have a 27 floor building (Hallmark Place), a taller building should be built. Talking about it is a start.
Given the cost of construction, it's just unlikely.
     
     
  #1683  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2007, 1:45 AM
Jonitecture's Avatar
Jonitecture Jonitecture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 186
Quote:
Something like this could be built quite easily. But would it not be better to have two 20 floor stuctures instead? Maybe fill in the gaps in the skyline we already have.

agreed, i think we should work on our skyline, but wouldnt it be nicer to have more empty lots taken up then to build one massive building? although a skyline does beautify a city from a distance, restuarants, shops, ect. are why people come to downtown cores. and wouldnt a massive office tower not fit in with most of our 10-20 office towers? we need more 20-30 storey office towers.
     
     
  #1684  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2007, 3:03 AM
richmond richmond is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 46
Height

Heck, I'd be happy with some 4 storey buildings downtown to replace the sea of asphalt parking lots that haunts downtown. Retail on first, offices of second & a few stories of condos on top. Land is still fairly inexpensive here, thus it really doesn't pay to go tall ... yet.
     
     
  #1685  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2007, 5:20 AM
jaysfan99 jaysfan99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 260
Any construction downtown that looks nice would be positive. I just want our downtown to have more density. Some tall buildings, condos would put more people downtown. I'd really like to see something happen along 3rd ave.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonitecture View Post
agreed, i think we should work on our skyline, but wouldnt it be nicer to have more empty lots taken up then to build one massive building? although a skyline does beautify a city from a distance, restuarants, shops, ect. are why people come to downtown cores. and wouldnt a massive office tower not fit in with most of our 10-20 office towers? we need more 20-30 storey office towers.
     
     
  #1686  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2007, 6:34 AM
Stewie's Avatar
Stewie Stewie is offline
You are here: X
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaysfan99 View Post
I went and had a look. Looks like a condo development, but I would guess it to be 8 floors max. That crane is kind of wimpy.

Wimpy is an understatement.

I think that site will be MAX 6 floors, probably 5 floors. That wimpy crane is no more than 80 feet high - But any progress is good progress I guess.
     
     
  #1687  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2007, 6:37 PM
john316 john316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
A 25 story office building with maybe a slightly shorter downtown would certainly do a lot to give a beefier balance skyline for saskatoon. Along 3rd would be great. A 25 story office building for Cameco could turn out to be roughly 380 ft. when you add in mechanical and possible top feature.
     
     
  #1688  
Old Posted Jun 7, 2007, 6:39 PM
john316 john316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
Sorry. Forgot to put in Condo Tower after "slightly shorter" in my last post
     
     
  #1689  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2007, 1:15 AM
Jonitecture's Avatar
Jonitecture Jonitecture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 186
does anyone think we need a new city hall anytime soon?
     
     
  #1690  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2007, 6:20 AM
jaysfan99 jaysfan99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 260
Ya, a 25 story high rise.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonitecture View Post
does anyone think we need a new city hall anytime soon?
     
     
  #1691  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2007, 6:22 AM
jaysfan99 jaysfan99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 260
The more people living along 3rd ave the better. This would make our downtown alive at night. Would love a few condo developments along 3rd ave. I'm not talking about senior assisted living. Seniors never go outside. We need young professionals down there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by john316 View Post
A 25 story office building with maybe a slightly shorter downtown would certainly do a lot to give a beefier balance skyline for saskatoon. Along 3rd would be great. A 25 story office building for Cameco could turn out to be roughly 380 ft. when you add in mechanical and possible top feature.
     
     
  #1692  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2007, 12:05 PM
Dalreg's Avatar
Dalreg Dalreg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 1,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaysfan99 View Post
The more people living along 3rd ave the better. This would make our downtown alive at night. Would love a few condo developments along 3rd ave. I'm not talking about senior assisted living. Seniors never go outside. We need young professionals down there.
Would you be willing to live downtown? The market has want the market currently supports. If there was a demand for condo's on 3rd, someone would step foward and build them. Until such time it is only a dream.

Personally I would love to see some real towers built, say 60+ stories to rival the rest of Canada. But guess what it isn't going to happen any time soon.
     
     
  #1693  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2007, 4:24 PM
jaysfan99 jaysfan99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 260
60+ stories is a dream! One 30-40 tower is possible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalreg View Post
Would you be willing to live downtown? The market has want the market currently supports. If there was a demand for condo's on 3rd, someone would step foward and build them. Until such time it is only a dream.

Personally I would love to see some real towers built, say 60+ stories to rival the rest of Canada. But guess what it isn't going to happen any time soon.

Last edited by jaysfan99; Jun 8, 2007 at 4:31 PM.
     
     
  #1694  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2007, 7:53 PM
Jonitecture's Avatar
Jonitecture Jonitecture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 186
third avenue is ugly, i sat save the historic buildings, tear down wost of the rest and build office towers, nice office towers, second avenue is the street that should have activity at night, not third
     
     
  #1695  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2007, 1:34 AM
Dalreg's Avatar
Dalreg Dalreg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 1,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaysfan99 View Post
60+ stories is a dream! One 30-40 tower is possible.
Actually 30/40 is a dream right now.

What's missing:

1 developer
2 client
3 site

If these are established then maybe your tower could be a possibility. Till then it is a dream.

As for 60+ like I said it isn't going to happen any time soon. But if your shooting for something aim high!
     
     
  #1696  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2007, 1:55 AM
Wormo's Avatar
Wormo Wormo is offline
Gone
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 21
How about the 30 storey in my avatar?
     
     
  #1697  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2007, 2:35 AM
jaysfan99 jaysfan99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 260
Ok you got me on the developer, but someone should take a chance on Saskatoon. As for the site, 22nd and 3rd ave is a perfect location, we just need a developer with some vision. The client, could be a mix use development with Cameco as the anchor! A 30/40 floor development may not be built, but should be. Maybe we should call on Donald Trump,........................................................................................................................................................................just kidding. We should be so lucky as to have him look at Saskatoon.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalreg View Post
Actually 30/40 is a dream right now.

What's missing:

1 developer
2 client
3 site

If these are established then maybe your tower could be a possibility. Till then it is a dream.

As for 60+ like I said it isn't going to happen any time soon. But if your shooting for something aim high!

Last edited by jaysfan99; Jun 9, 2007 at 2:44 AM.
     
     
  #1698  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2007, 4:40 PM
newflyer's Avatar
newflyer newflyer is offline
Capitalist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 5,086
How tall is Saskatoon's tallest office building ( feet and floors )??
__________________
Check out my city at
http://www.allwinnipeg.com **More than Ever**
     
     
  #1699  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2007, 6:33 PM
jaysfan99 jaysfan99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 260
Unhappy

Out tallest building is La Renaissance Apartments at 79.2 m, 24 floors. The tallest office building is the Saskatoon Square at 72.0 m, 17 floors.



Quote:
Originally Posted by newflyer View Post
How tall is Saskatoon's tallest office building ( feet and floors )??
     
     
  #1700  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2007, 8:41 PM
richmond richmond is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 46
Towers?

Who would move into these new office towers? Residential property is taking off so I can see some condo towers near the river, but I don't think we're running out of commercial property. And, if we actually are, I don't think we have any 'big' clients out there that would justify a tower once Cameco gets theirs.

You go tall, you get a pretty postcard but are in danger of creating the horrendous unoccupied canyons of downtown Calgary.

Big projects currently out for tender ... Intervac at the U of S & the Shaw Centre (the civic centre on the west side). We might then get a good opinion of how construction costs are in the city.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.