Quote:
Originally Posted by skylife
I haven't driven a car in 7 years and it has been a breeze. I'm just sayin'.
|
same for me in chicago. if my quality of life was so degraded by going car free in chicago as crawford assumes, i would have sucked it up and bought a car by now, but i haven't because going car-free in chicago is eezy-peezy and it makes WAY too much finacial sense to ditch the wheels in chicago. there is no doubt that NYC is far and away the best city in america to go car free in, transit coverage there, specifically rail transit coverage, is on a whole order of magnitude larger than any other city in this country. and it has far and away the most pedestrian-oriented culture to boot. but those things do not mean NYC is the only place that's easy to go car-free in. i get around chicago just fine. the main difference is that in a city like chicago, car-freers like me are the minority, whereas in NYC, they are the majority.
every city in america is certainly more car-oriented than NYC, but there cities out there where carlessness is still conveniently doable. i guess perspective plays a big role in it as well. at some point i guess an argument could be made that going car free in any city is convenient and doable, it's just how much you're willing to put up with. also, the way one structures their life in a given city (where they live, where they work, where they play, etc.) greatly affects how easy being auto-free really is. in new york, it's probably an issue of there being so much more area of the city that is open to easy car-free living than other cities like boston, chicago, or san fran where car-free living can be easy, but not neccessarily so for every corner of the city, as in the big apple.