HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #661  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2007, 10:12 PM
Marcu Marcu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpIllInoIs View Post
The Chicago condo market is not affected by the Suburban market.

And there are plenty of Metra stops in old suburban downtowns left for TODs.
Edgebrook is still 1-2 storeys, Old DT Glenview, Northbrook and Edison Park are likely choices. The unknown old subs like Berkely and Maywood would be awesome for new midrise condos. I even expect that Melrose Park and Bellwood will eventually get some interest. There is no shortage of good locations for TOD in the old suburban ring.
Edgebrook will never be anything over 1-2 stories unless gas gets up to 8$/gallon.
     
     
  #662  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2007, 11:31 PM
BorisMolotov's Avatar
BorisMolotov BorisMolotov is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 548
That is a good point. We'll likely see a lot more TOD in the future everywhere as gas prices continue to rise.
     
     
  #663  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 1:39 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
Arquitectonica LSE Tower

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alliance View Post
Bad news...according to ChicagoShawn, the Arquitechtonica LSE tower will not break the 1000 ft mark.
Shawn also mentioned it won't come to market for another 5 months or so. I'm a bit surprised they would wait so long, as I believe Aqua is close to 90% sold. The trick to these master-planned developments is to keep product rolling continuously right along - as soon as one building is sufficiently sold, you launch the next right away. As Aqua's condos won't begin to deliver for probably 2.5 years (this is ample time to sell that last 10-15%), I would think they would want to get the next condo tower to market asap - I'm assuming they are aiming for a late 2010 delivery for the Arquitectonica building. So who here cares to boldly post a rendering? I know there are readers here who have something to post (I promise, I won't say a thing!)
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #664  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 1:43 AM
BorisMolotov's Avatar
BorisMolotov BorisMolotov is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 548
^ Is this the next project in LSE, though, or is there another Lancaster-type one lined up next?
     
     
  #665  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 1:58 AM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
^ I don't expect them to do any more "minor" Lancaster-type buildings unless the market begins to seriously soften.
     
     
  #666  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 2:10 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
^ Neither do I - I think the economics of the development (along with the city's encouragement of tall and thin) are aligning to favor bigger (and hopefully badder too) structures...

Once the developers really hone in on what Aqua's actual returns will turn out to be, I think that project will be a grand slam financially. I may chide Loewenberg and his mandatory 8'8" ceilings, but these guys are very savvy developers, and I think if you can make a larger profit in some cases by building taller and the city is supportive, they are going to go after it huge...

Urban design-wise, I think the development will benefit by having fewer buildings, but taller and thinner ones. Perhaps only 12 instead of the originally planned 16, but lets see some 900 and 1,000-footers...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #667  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 6:05 AM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
Shawn also mentioned it won't come to market for another 5 months or so. I'm a bit surprised they would wait so long, as I believe Aqua is close to 90% sold. The trick to these master-planned developments is to keep product rolling continuously right along - as soon as one building is sufficiently sold, you launch the next right away. As Aqua's condos won't begin to deliver for probably 2.5 years (this is ample time to sell that last 10-15%), I would think they would want to get the next condo tower to market asap - I'm assuming they are aiming for a late 2010 delivery for the Arquitectonica building. So who here cares to boldly post a rendering? I know there are readers here who have something to post (I promise, I won't say a thing!)
How much inventory do they have left in the Regatta and the Chandler?
     
     
  #668  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 2:36 PM
Alliance's Avatar
Alliance Alliance is offline
NEW YORK | CHICAGO
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
Urban design-wise, I think the development will benefit by having fewer buildings, but taller and thinner ones. Perhaps only 12 instead of the originally planned 16, but lets see some 900 and 1,000-footers...
I think the city would be wise by following that plan.
__________________
My: Skyscraper Art - Diagrams - Diagram Thread
     
     
  #669  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 5:13 PM
alex1's Avatar
alex1 alex1 is offline
~
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: www.priggish.com
Posts: 3,978
the suburban "mini-boom" talk is something I've been contemplating for a week now. How is it that an area of chicago that makes up over 5 million people does so little in terms of high-rises (especially outside of evanston).

Would be nice to see things change in the near future.
__________________
n+y+c = nyc
     
     
  #670  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 5:14 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaLFuego View Post
How much inventory do they have left in the Regatta and the Chandler?
Virtually nothing from what I recall.
     
     
  #671  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 8:36 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
Silver Tower - Construction Finally Imminent?!?

Walked by the Silver Tower site today - 2 Revcon cranes have been delivered...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #672  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 9:15 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
Walked by the Silver Tower site today - 2 Revcon cranes have been delivered...

About time....
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #673  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 9:27 PM
Chicago92 Chicago92 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 39
Does anyone know what is planned for the lot exactly to the west of Pizzeria Uno - Wabash & Grand?

The lot is fenced off and the little parking lot there is being torn up now.

Sorry if I have missed this if discussed before...
     
     
  #674  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 9:58 PM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,830
Quote:
Originally Posted by alex1 View Post
the suburban "mini-boom" talk is something I've been contemplating for a week now. How is it that an area of chicago that makes up over 5 million people does so little in terms of high-rises (especially outside of evanston).

Would be nice to see things change in the near future.
Restrictive zoning and NIMBYs who fight to keep it that way. Unless the irrational fear of high-rise buildings is overcome by many of these communities, do not expect any major boom of high-rise construction in the suburbs outside of Evanston.
     
     
  #675  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 10:05 PM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
^^^^ I saw that Pizza Uno lot too.. but haven't heard a peep about what's up there.

Any development here would likely eliminate threat to the Pizza building for a teardown, so I would welcome just about anything.
     
     
  #676  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 10:06 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago Shawn View Post
Restrictive zoning and NIMBYs who fight to keep it that way. Unless the irrational fear of high-rise buildings is overcome by many of these communities, do not expect any major boom of high-rise construction in the suburbs outside of Evanston.
You're mostly correct, except for Aurora. Aurora has a bunch of conversions or midrise buildings, but it is also planning a hotel/convention center and that HUGE East Bank project (that was approved IIRC).

     
     
  #677  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 11:08 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
You're mostly correct, except for Aurora. Aurora has a bunch of conversions or midrise buildings, but it is also planning a hotel/convention center and that HUGE East Bank project (that was approved IIRC).

This oozes suburban coolness, I hope the final project ends up something like this. I mean yeah some of the architecture is a tad po-mo, but I'll take this over McMansions anyday.
     
     
  #678  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2007, 11:44 PM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
50 East Chestnut

Taken today:



     
     
  #679  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2007, 1:00 AM
Busy Bee's Avatar
Busy Bee Busy Bee is offline
Closeted Normie
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the artistic spectrum
Posts: 13,017
^ Nice/

On another note, a new rendering of The St. Clair at Cityfront Plaza has been posted at YoChicago. Definitely an improvement over the older renderings.
__________________
Everything new is old again

Sic semper tyrannis
     
     
  #680  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2007, 1:33 AM
Alliance's Avatar
Alliance Alliance is offline
NEW YORK | CHICAGO
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,532
Its so thin
__________________
My: Skyscraper Art - Diagrams - Diagram Thread
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:08 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.