HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #321  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2007, 11:00 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norsider View Post
I find it hard to believe that the air rights were just offered to them. Perhaps they had a right to purchase it and didn't exercise it. Or perhaps they had them and then the developer sold them, but they wouldn't just offer, out of the blue (so to speak) valuable air rights to a condo board.

If they did just turn down the air rights, this is the dumbest condo board of all time. If I live in River City, I call my lawyer and see if I can sue the board for damages.

Not only that - if this was actually the case, DPD should MANDATE that 403 N. Wabash be at least 40 stories tall, because not only does the association not own the air rights, they were actually given the chance to, and refused!
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #322  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2007, 11:05 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2PRUROCKS! View Post
This was posted by ARCHYTYPE over in the CS thread about the long rumored next tower to be announced for LSE.

"Building C going up at the end of Wacker is 1,070', it will have more skyline presence than Trump (although not the notoriety), and it will look much cooler. The CS will essentially be like 2 Trump Towers minus the spire."





Amazing. We could actually be looking at a legimate Thousand-footer in Lakeshore East?! What an appropriately bold move by the developers. As much grief as many of us take pleasure in giving Loewenberg and Carlins, it truly does seem like they are trying to do some reallly great things for our urban environment. Because of the view corridors toward this site, it is the perfect location for a building on the scale of Waterview. I'm loving it!! Now it is time for the renderings and models to be leaked!! We know some of you have them, you can't keep secrets in like this - they'll end up eating you alive!!
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #323  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2007, 11:07 PM
Dan in Chicago's Avatar
Dan in Chicago Dan in Chicago is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 612
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2PRUROCKS! View Post
If it is 1070 from CCD or park level it would still have a good shot at just breaking 1000ft from upper Wacker.
Yes, without a doubt. At Columbus & South Water, the upper street level is 56 feet above ground base. So 70 feet is plenty of leeway.
__________________
Gallery, list, & map of all Chicago high-rises under construction
     
     
  #324  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2007, 11:13 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
Someone apparently in the know over on CS posted that it will be a legitimate 1,070' from UPPER Wacker!!

It gets better and better!
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #325  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2007, 11:20 PM
jjk1103 jjk1103 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 878
...I used to be the Treasurer of River Plaza Condo Assoc (405 Wabash). I was the first treasurer (when the building was first taken condo). I guarantee you we were never informed by the developers about the "air rights issue"...we just knew the developer owned the garage. That little plaza is a green oasis for everyone who lives around there (not just River Plaza)......sticking a building there is just greedy overkill. I haven't lived there in 7 years, but I would recommend that people on this forum (who tend to live downtown) go over there.......it is shame to lose that little oasis.
     
     
  #326  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2007, 11:22 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norsider View Post
I find it hard to believe that the air rights were just offered to them. Perhaps they had a right to purchase it and didn't exercise it. Or perhaps they had them and then the developer sold them, but they wouldn't just offer, out of the blue (so to speak) valuable air rights to a condo board.

If they did just turn down the air rights, this is the dumbest condo board of all time. If I live in River City, I call my lawyer and see if I can sue the board for damages.
Uh, I'm positive he meant that it was offered in exchange for money....i.e. the opportunity cost. The board turned it down because it would have cost money that I'm sure they don't have in reserves, and in order to come up with the money, it would have meant a special assessment of several thousands dollars per unit, and there's no way you could voluntarily get a condo association to agree to that.

Air rights like that are worth at least several million dollars.
     
     
  #327  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2007, 11:22 PM
budman budman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by Latoso View Post
I was walking through River Plaza when I saw a rendering and info. on a proposed 17 storey approximately 220 foot building at 403 N. Wabash immediately adjacent to Trump Tower on the north. It would be built over the existing garage entrance and garden area for River Plaza where the pedestrian stairs go through and it would share River Plaza's driveway. Anyway here are some pics of the notice that I took today.











^Looks like the AMA building right next door.
     
     
  #328  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2007, 11:30 PM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
April 13, 2007


Finally some activity over at the Silver Tower site.

Last edited by SolarWind; Apr 14, 2007 at 4:28 AM.
     
     
  #329  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2007, 11:45 PM
museumparktom museumparktom is offline
Chicagotom SSC
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 438
I agree with JJK103 this is just overkill and I think that even though its only going to be 200 feet its going to take away from the view south on Wabash from Ontario. This is just flat out greed. I can't believe you can fit this building in.
     
     
  #330  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2007, 12:25 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
The Clare at Watertower

April 13, 2007






Last edited by SolarWind; Apr 14, 2007 at 4:47 AM.
     
     
  #331  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2007, 12:29 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
The Clare at Watertower

     
     
  #332  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2007, 12:33 AM
SlatsGrobnik SlatsGrobnik is offline
Expert
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by archytype View Post
yea at ul Wacker, I have the rendering-it's very beautiful and the base, pretty awesome. but will let my bosses release it to emporis when it's ready (ie. after Aqua is sold),
Thanks for letting us know about it. I see you tried to pull it back. Hope you didn't get into any hot water over it.

We'll all just wait patiently for the official release. (AAAAAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!)
     
     
  #333  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2007, 12:37 AM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
550 St. Clair taken today:

     
     
  #334  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2007, 12:42 AM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
600 N. Fairbanks taken today:

     
     
  #335  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2007, 12:48 AM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,044
Looking back at all of Archytypes posts, he has been giving us hints all along. And has hinted to more supertalls than just this one.

Some of his posts:
"Just wait for the release of the 1000'ers image, the build-out of LSE is a given-the Architectonica building is a given, and more supertalls in the development will arise."

"LSE with their sales and marketing force and general love and ability to create supertall within their own city approved Planning Department, there will be a total of four 80+ story buildings within the LakeShore East Park along the river and Columbus, and a few that are 70 or more. The PD that has been set and approved by the city has been pushed far beyond the building heights set-with unanimous city approval."

"you better raise it to a height of 900'. it's building C in LSE by architectonica and has a big hole piercing the top."

And then what he just said.
Archytype. Thanks so much! You are such an asset to this forum.
     
     
  #336  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2007, 12:49 AM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
50 East Chestnut taken today:

Taken today:






Last edited by i_am_hydrogen; Apr 14, 2007 at 1:11 AM.
     
     
  #337  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2007, 12:51 AM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjk1103 View Post
That little plaza is a green oasis for everyone who lives around there (not just River Plaza)......sticking a building there is just greedy overkill. I haven't lived there in 7 years, but I would recommend that people on this forum (who tend to live downtown) go over there.......it is shame to lose that little oasis.

You know, I think you are completely right. That is a special part of the city, and seeing greenspace disappear is a bad thing altogether. Especially when you consider that Buck will be removing the park next to the AMA building soon too.

I used to love the old Solomon-designed plaza at the Sun-Times building as well.

For 17 stories, I really don't think it's worth it. If we were getting something really great, I might reconsider. But for now, I am not in favor of this dinky tower.
     
     
  #338  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2007, 12:54 AM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
Parkview West taken today:

     
     
  #339  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2007, 1:00 AM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,044
I posted this on the Chicago Spire topic, but it doesn't really belong there so I'll post it here as well.
---

Looking back at all of Archytypes posts, he has been giving us hints all along.

Some of his posts:
"Just wait for the release of the 1000'ers image, the build-out of LSE is a given-the Architectonica building is a given, and more supertalls in the development will arise."

"LSE with their sales and marketing force and general love and ability to create supertall within their own city approved Planning Department, there will be a total of four 80+ story buildings within the LakeShore East Park along the river and Columbus, and a few that are 70 or more. The PD that has been set and approved by the city has been pushed far beyond the building heights set-with unanimous city approval."

"you better raise it to a height of 900'. it's building C in LSE by architectonica and has a big hole piercing the top."

And then what he just said about a 1,070' building to be announced once Aqua has been sold out.
     
     
  #340  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2007, 1:00 AM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
50 East Chestnut

April 13, 2007


Last edited by SolarWind; Apr 14, 2007 at 4:47 AM.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:12 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.