HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1641  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2007, 12:31 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago Shawn View Post
Yes it was. Lucien LaGrange's Uptown project (with the trapazoid windows) was also approved today.
Thanks Shawn - I forgot about the Uptown high-rise....
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #1642  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2007, 12:32 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280 View Post
I saw an Ad on a bus today for Park Monroe, what is the deal with that, are they still planning on massacring that building with a half-redo?

Unfortunately, yes. I really fear the actual result - much like the renderings - will be absolutely cringe-inducing...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #1643  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2007, 3:24 PM
museumparktom museumparktom is offline
Chicagotom SSC
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 438
This new marketing may be tied to Park Monroe releasing lower floors. I went last Summer and looked at the models. They were selling the top 8 floors at that time, with plans to sell another 8 - 10 floors in 2007. I don't recall the floor numbers that were part of the condo conversion.
     
     
  #1644  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2007, 9:20 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
http://www.dailyherald.com/search/searchstory.asp?id=291010

Towering Naperville plan revealed

Developer wants to build 188-foot tall hotel, condo towers along city’s northern edge

By Jill Jedlowski

Daily Herald Staff Writer
Posted Thursday, March 15, 2007

Naperville’s tallest buildings could rise up along the city’s northern edge if a proposal for a full-service hotel and two condominium towers moves ahead.

At least a handful of residents, however, aren’t keen on their suburb getting some metropolitan flair.

Developers pitched the Tree House at the Ravines, slated for Warrenville and Barkei roads, at the city’s plan commission meeting Wednesday. Plans call for a 188-foot tall hotel with 205 guest rooms, condo towers of comparable height with a combined 286 units, and 14 townhouses.

The condos would be a creative solution to a housing void that would appeal to both young professionals and empty nesters, said James Letchinger, president of JDL Development, which has partnered with Oakbrook Terrace-based Harp Group on the project.

The four-star hotel was billed as the first of its kind in the area, according to Peter Dumon, president of Harp Group. He made a case for the buildings’ height, saying it’s necessary for two reasons: to minimize the horizontal size and to make the hotel eye-catching to motorists.

“We think this is a responsible way to develop it with the least amount of impact,” Dumon said.

Developers vowed to incorporate most of the site’s many mature trees and ravines into the design.

“We want this to be a timeless place and a lasting legacy,” Dumon said.

Roughly 20 residents spoke out on the issue, with half emphatically backing the proposal as an opportunity to add housing variety and a new, sizeable tax source.

Resident Jerry Schlegel said the project was an ambitious amenity planned for an ideal spot — on the town’s border rather than in the center.

An equal number of people, though, worried the legacy left behind won’t be one of pride for the city.

“It’s a shock to see this,” said Pat Miller, president of the neighboring Indian Hill Woods homeowners group. “It truly looks more like Michigan Avenue than Naperville.”

Concerns included neighborhood safety, late-night overflow from the bar and banquet facility, storm water management and local school crowding.

In order to proceed with plans, developers must get the city’s permission to rezone the 13-acre parcel.

Plan commissioner Bill Jepson called the density “totally out of line” and the height “extremely excessive” compared to city code.

Fellow commissioner Mike Brown said that despite concerns about the height, he’s excited about the possibilities.

An attorney for the development defended the proposal, saying that because it’s a planned-unit development, some creative and innovative liberties are not only allowed, but also encouraged, according to the city’s guidelines.

The matter was continued to the April 11 plan commission meeting.
     
     
  #1645  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2007, 11:42 PM
DePaul Bunyan DePaul Bunyan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
Roughly 20 residents spoke out on the issue, with half emphatically backing the proposal as an opportunity to add housing variety and a new, sizeable tax source.
That's actually surprising, half of the residents who showed up support the project. And why is it bad if it looks like Michigan Avenue?
__________________
"Who does vote for these dishonest shitheads?"

-Hunter S. Thompson (click for full quote)
     
     
  #1646  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2007, 3:25 AM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
50 E Chestnut and the Clare

     
     
  #1647  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2007, 4:35 AM
Chitown Chitown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 584
^Hehe, cool. It's neat to see those two go up so close together.
     
     
  #1648  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2007, 5:32 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
http://www.dailyherald.com/search/searchstory.asp?id=291010

Towering Naperville plan revealed

Developer wants to build 188-foot tall hotel, condo towers along city’s northern edge

By Jill Jedlowski

Daily Herald Staff Writer
Posted Thursday, March 15, 2007

Naperville’s tallest buildings could rise up along the city’s northern edge if a proposal for a full-service hotel and two condominium towers moves ahead.

At least a handful of residents, however, aren’t keen on their suburb getting some metropolitan flair.

Developers pitched the Tree House at the Ravines, slated for Warrenville and Barkei roads, at the city’s plan commission meeting Wednesday. Plans call for a 188-foot tall hotel with 205 guest rooms, condo towers of comparable height with a combined 286 units, and 14 townhouses.

The condos would be a creative solution to a housing void that would appeal to both young professionals and empty nesters, said James Letchinger, president of JDL Development, which has partnered with Oakbrook Terrace-based Harp Group on the project.

The four-star hotel was billed as the first of its kind in the area, according to Peter Dumon, president of Harp Group. He made a case for the buildings’ height, saying it’s necessary for two reasons: to minimize the horizontal size and to make the hotel eye-catching to motorists.

“We think this is a responsible way to develop it with the least amount of impact,” Dumon said.

Developers vowed to incorporate most of the site’s many mature trees and ravines into the design.

“We want this to be a timeless place and a lasting legacy,” Dumon said.

Roughly 20 residents spoke out on the issue, with half emphatically backing the proposal as an opportunity to add housing variety and a new, sizeable tax source.

Resident Jerry Schlegel said the project was an ambitious amenity planned for an ideal spot — on the town’s border rather than in the center.

An equal number of people, though, worried the legacy left behind won’t be one of pride for the city.

“It’s a shock to see this,” said Pat Miller, president of the neighboring Indian Hill Woods homeowners group. “It truly looks more like Michigan Avenue than Naperville.”

Concerns included neighborhood safety, late-night overflow from the bar and banquet facility, storm water management and local school crowding.

In order to proceed with plans, developers must get the city’s permission to rezone the 13-acre parcel.

Plan commissioner Bill Jepson called the density “totally out of line” and the height “extremely excessive” compared to city code.

Fellow commissioner Mike Brown said that despite concerns about the height, he’s excited about the possibilities.

An attorney for the development defended the proposal, saying that because it’s a planned-unit development, some creative and innovative liberties are not only allowed, but also encouraged, according to the city’s guidelines.

The matter was continued to the April 11 plan commission meeting.
These fools could learn a thing or 2 about Michigan Avenue. I mean seriously!!!
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #1649  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2007, 4:58 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,510
If anyone's interested I found this photo of the construction site of The Granville on flickr (taken by the user 'abmarfia'):

http://www.flickr.com/photos/abmarfia/423825385/

not sure how to link directly to another user's photos.
     
     
  #1650  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2007, 6:57 PM
TransitEngr TransitEngr is offline
(the rascacielo freak)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 387
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila View Post


Sorta like this? It was published in a issue of Crain's about 3 years ago.

I don't think this will be bad at all if the city takes steps to make the intersection at Canal and Van Buren much more pedestrian friendly. With residents in the post office, they pretty much have to. The strip parking lot on the west side of the post office can be easily converted into a pedestrian promenade, with an underpass or overpass to cross 290.
You know ardecila... I have to be honest, I can't really make out your posting of that rendering to terribly well. The proposed development seems to have a lower center/core than what I'm seeing here above, with multiple small mid-rises facing out onto that one common raised podium with a garden rooftop on that podium...again, similar to The Metropolis in Midtown Atlanta.... but more gothic, grey, bulky, gritty and powerful.

I do agree with you 100%, it could end up being decent, particularly if adjustments are made to lighting, bike paths, benches, planters, streetscaping, etc around there to make it have a SLIGHTLY better pedestrian feeling.
     
     
  #1651  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2007, 10:06 PM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,423
Hey, I think I just found a rendering of the Post Office Redevelopment on accident...



^^^That looks like they are doing some major demolition to rennovate it...
     
     
  #1652  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2007, 10:17 PM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
Vetro

Taken today:





     
     
  #1653  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2007, 10:21 PM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
Printers Corner and Marquee Michigan Ave

PC


MM
     
     
  #1654  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2007, 10:26 PM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
The Columbian

     
     
  #1655  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2007, 10:36 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
^Thanks for all the photos. Vetro looks like it will come out pretty nice. But Printers Corner and Marquee? Plain disgusting.
     
     
  #1656  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2007, 11:12 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by TransitEngr View Post
You know ardecila... I have to be honest, I can't really make out your posting of that rendering to terribly well. The proposed development seems to have a lower center/core than what I'm seeing here above, with multiple small mid-rises facing out onto that one common raised podium with a garden rooftop on that podium...again, similar to The Metropolis in Midtown Atlanta.... but more gothic, grey, bulky, gritty and powerful.

I do agree with you 100%, it could end up being decent, particularly if adjustments are made to lighting, bike paths, benches, planters, streetscaping, etc around there to make it have a SLIGHTLY better pedestrian feeling.
This is basically how Crain's described the rendering in the original article:

The blue masses on the roof actually extend down to ground level or a few floors above it. I believe they are light court atriums with elevator banks. This rendering shows a project by McClier Architects where the North tower becomes office, the South becomes apartments, and the center section is partitioned into 3 or 4 seperate sections with seperate elevator banks, etc. These sections could be used for office, retail, or apartments depending on the choice of the developer.

The atriums I described, and their elevator banks, would extend one story up to the roof, where there would be a large park.
     
     
  #1657  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2007, 11:37 PM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280 View Post
Hey, I think I just found a rendering of the Post Office Redevelopment on accident...



^^^That looks like they are doing some major demolition to rennovate it...
Yes, I believe the most current plan regrettably does call for a substantial demolition of the interior section.
     
     
  #1658  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2007, 1:40 AM
Nowhereman1280 Nowhereman1280 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pungent Onion, Illinois
Posts: 8,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by honte View Post
Yes, I believe the most current plan regrettably does call for a substantial demolition of the interior section.
Ugg, that ruins the monolithic badassery of the design though!

Couldn't they just use all of the space in the middle and make more money instead of wasting money destroying perfectly good space?
     
     
  #1659  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2007, 2:25 AM
Alliance's Avatar
Alliance Alliance is offline
NEW YORK | CHICAGO
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,532
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhereman1280 View Post
Ugg, that ruins the monolithic badassery of the design though!

Couldn't they just use all of the space in the middle and make more money instead of wasting money destroying perfectly good space?
I don't think it ruins it. The buildings not THAT big. I'd kind of liek to see something ala heasrt tower in the middle. Something real modern.
     
     
  #1660  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2007, 4:25 AM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
But Printers Corner and Marquee? Plain disgusting.
I know. I felt bad reminding people that these buildings even exist.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:17 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.