HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #461  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2007, 1:40 AM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,340
Personally I think 155 N Wacker is a very good fit for that location. It's a straight forward central business district highrise. Sure it's mediocre, but when you're going for uber density, you can't have every single building screaming "Hey, look at ME!!" It's too busy.
It'll do it's job, which is to thicken the skyline background while everyone's looking up at Trump, Waterview and the Spire.

That's not to say that this building couldn't be a standout type, or even shouldn't be, but that the skyline needs both standouts and background buildings.

My main complaint is with that empty executive lobby. There really should be retail there.
     
     
  #462  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2007, 4:41 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,329
Main headline ("Cornell Highrise Stalled"). Bummer!



http://www.hpherald.com/
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4WNEwTDZlUKB1w8ED5bV2Q

People who say housing is a human right deserve to be homeless
     
     
  #463  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2007, 4:43 AM
Marvel 33's Avatar
Marvel 33 Marvel 33 is offline
"The World is my Oyster"
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
It's okay... Nothing special.. To be honest, I'm tired of these mediocre 50 story office towers.

Seeing as Daley wants downtown to become a 24-hour destination, I would change the zoning codes or something to either persuade or force developers to build several floors of residential atop their buildings.---i.e. an office worker pulls an all nighter, instead of the long drive back to Shaumburg, they could just go upstairs to their crash-pad

just an idea....
We are very spoiled in Chicago. If this project was in any other city in the country (except for New York), people there would be celebrating without a doubt!
__________________
CHICAGO
Also known as:
The Windy City - The City of Broad Shoulders - Chitown - City in a Garden - Gem of the Prairie - Second City - The "I Will" City
_________________________________
Architectural News At: NewcitySkyline.com
     
     
  #464  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2007, 5:14 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,329
^ So true.

155 N Wacker has a distinct look. Even though it's not that tall, its design seems to accentuate its verticality.

What bugs me is that the garage entrance faces Wacker (if I'm looking at the rendering correctly). What's that all about?
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4WNEwTDZlUKB1w8ED5bV2Q

People who say housing is a human right deserve to be homeless
     
     
  #465  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2007, 6:50 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
I like the revised design for 155 Wacker. Like Honte, I do miss the assymetrical aspect of the earlier design, but I think the newest version is pretty solid. The quality of the glass looks nice in the rendering - I hope it actually turns out looking like that...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #466  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2007, 6:57 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
It's okay... Nothing special.. To be honest, I'm tired of these mediocre 50 story office towers.

Seeing as Daley wants downtown to become a 24-hour destination, I would change the zoning codes or something to either persuade or force developers to build several floors of residential atop their buildings.---i.e. an office worker pulls an all nighter, instead of the long drive back to Shaumburg, they could just go upstairs to their crash-pad

just an idea....
I think this is generally the future of new office towers in Chicago. For a few different reasons, it's actually possible that we may never see a new all-office building that's taller than, say, 65 stories or so. Efficiency has a lot to do with this. In addition, I think it's going to be the rare office tower going forward that blows us away with awe-inspring design, due in large part to the sort of generic requriements for a spec office building program - usually uniform very efficient boxy floor plates of 25,000-30,000 sf. (don't get me wrong -I'm not saying that office developers shouldn't aim for greatness and won't occasionally acheive it). What I'm saying is that imo we are much more likely to find the tallest buildings and highest quality design in residential and mixed-use towers. Personally, this sits fine with me because these will represent at least 90% of all new skyscraper construction anyway...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #467  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2007, 6:59 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi_Coruscant View Post
Hey, whatever happened to proposed 20-39 LaSalle? Was it send back to drawing board? Or is it dead?

That proposal is still alive but imo unlikely because I think landing an anchor tenant will prove very difficult...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #468  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2007, 7:03 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicubs111 View Post
Higher rents ahead
Tenants can expect fewer breaks as landlords gain edge

Attorney Steven Weiss, whose firm recently relocated, says landlords were reluctant to negotiate or to sweeten offers. Photo: Stephen J. Serio
Vacancies are dropping at downtown office buildings — good news for landlords but bad news for prospective tenants looking for breaks on rent.
The brighter times for landlords may be short-lived, however, as five new high-rises are set to open by late 2009. The almost 4.4 million square feet of additional office space from the new buildings will push vacancy rates to about 16%, from around 14% this year, according to a report by John Buck Co.'s Strategic Advisory Group.

Rents on premium office space are expected to climb about 6% this year to their highest level since 2002, the report by Buck's tenant-representation group shows.

Landlords welcome any good news in a market where vacancies remain high and rents are still below where they were five years ago.

"We were tired of getting our brains beat in," says C. J. Dempsey, vice-president of leasing for Chicago-based Equity Office Properties Trust, which owns seven office buildings downtown. "The tide has definitely turned."

Attorney Steven Weiss, chairman of business litigation firm Schopf & Weiss LLP, says landlords were reluctant to negotiate or sweeten offers while he was looking for a new location last year. The 22-lawyer firm moved in December from 312 W. Randolph St. to 1 S. Wacker Drive, where it is leasing an entire floor.

"Landlords felt things were moving in their direction over time, so they weren't quite as anxious to get deals done quickly," says Mr. Weiss, who led the search, which began in late 2005. "There wasn't as much flexibility as we expected."

However, most landlords were still offering money for interior improvements as well as six to 12 months of free rent, he says. Such perks, which became commonplace when the market soured for landlords in 2002, were even more generous a couple of years ago.

The office market's momentum and weakening demand for downtown condos prompted Prime Group Realty Trust, a Chicago-based real estate investment trust, to scrap plans to convert some floors at its 330 N. Wabash Ave. building to condos.

The building, formerly known as IBM Plaza, is losing its largest tenant, law firm Jenner & Block LLP, to one of the new buildings opening in 2009. Jenner is vacating about 20% of the building's total space. IBM vacated a similar amount of space in 2006.

Some investors are betting the Chicago office market will continue to improve. Sales of office towers last year eclipsed $5 billion, shattering the previous high of $3.3 billion set in 2005.

GE Asset Management Inc. was among the buyers last year, acquiring 181 W. Madison St. for $294 million, and now owns three office towers here — the most since GE entered the market in the 1980s, Managing Director Jerry Karr says.

The company had a banner year with its marquee Chicago property, Citigroup Center, at 500 W. Madison St., where GE signed new leases and renewed existing ones totaling 330,000 square feet — almost a quarter of the entire office space.

"We see Chicago as a major investment market," Mr. Karr says. "Has it been the place that has seen the most appreciation the last couple years? No. That's all the more reason I like Chicago. We believe that Chicago's turn is coming."




http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/mag/article.pl?article_id=27088&postDate=2007-01-13
Check out the new rendering for 601 Monroe. I've never seen that one before. However, that building is definitely larger than the 400,000 sf range. So, I'm not sure what exactly Fifield is planning. Like I'm sure many people here, I'm kind of getting frustrated with their long-standing love affair with 15-20 story office towers in the West Loop.
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #469  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2007, 7:13 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Isaac Newton View Post
I like the building a lot. Granted, I wouldn't object if they added 10 or 20 more floors to it, but I still can't complain. The article didn't mention numerous other proposed office buildings for the loop: 29-39 South LaSalle, 222 West Randolph, Wacker Plaza, ABN Amro Tower II, Madison West Tower II, and 120 North Jefferson. Maybe all of these won't be completed by 2009, but I would imagine that at least one or two would be.
Well, I think the article was trying to make an informed forecast of which buildings are more than likely to be completed by 2009. Personally, I think they did a pretty good job. The other proposals you mention frankly may never happen. I think downtown Chicago has quickly become a Hines-Buck-Fifield dominant market as far as office developers. There will certainly be exceptions that pop up from time to time - Hyatt Center and 353 North Clark being prime examples, but Hines Buck and Fifield have developed such impressive track records over the last several years that I would even expect the next blockbuster anchor-tenant new development deal that's announced to be developed by one of them (beyond 601 Monroe and 155 Wacker because even though all the ts aren't crossed yet I think they are done deals) So my prediction (and quite frankly my hope) is that Hines will be next(perhaps not until late 2008) and will land an anchor for the Levy site at Lake and Canal - another building to be designed by Pickard Chilton.
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #470  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2007, 2:40 PM
VivaLFuego's Avatar
VivaLFuego VivaLFuego is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Blue Island
Posts: 6,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
Main headline ("Cornell Highrise Stalled"). Bummer!



http://www.hpherald.com/
Too bad about the beavers.

Has L3 begun sales on this project? I haven't seen any indication. I really hope this and the 25-story Gang project get built, Hyde Park hasn't seen any new midrise or highrise contstruction in a long time.
     
     
  #471  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2007, 10:09 PM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,829
^Hyde Park's last two high-rises were built in 1990.


Astoria Tower is now officially under construction as of late last week.
     
     
  #472  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2007, 10:18 PM
brian_b brian_b is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Isaac Newton View Post
I like the building a lot. Granted, I wouldn't object if they added 10 or 20 more floors to it, but I still can't complain. The article didn't mention numerous other proposed office buildings for the loop: 29-39 South LaSalle, 222 West Randolph, Wacker Plaza, ABN Amro Tower II, Madison West Tower II, and 120 North Jefferson. Maybe all of these won't be completed by 2009, but I would imagine that at least one or two would be.
I'm nearly positive that the sign at 120 N Jefferson advertising an office building has been replaced with a for sale sign.

I can check on that in the next day or two.
     
     
  #473  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2007, 12:40 AM
HowardL's Avatar
HowardL HowardL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: East Lakeview, Chicago
Posts: 1,155
Not huge news, but 757 Orleans may be inching toward site prep. Ran into a mate on the L this morning who works across the street from that site and he was saying that the rickety old parking lot there had closed. Sure enough, got off the train at Chicago and the lot is definitely closed.

This one is nothing special and it's taken ages to get it going, but another hole in River North may soon be filled in.
     
     
  #474  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2007, 2:33 AM
UberAlles's Avatar
UberAlles UberAlles is offline
x-Chicago
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 676
I working on a map of current construction for building over 45 floors. I don't have much time to work on it, but will add content as I have time.

http://www.boca-del-mar.com/publish/map.htm
     
     
  #475  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2007, 2:44 AM
BorisMolotov's Avatar
BorisMolotov BorisMolotov is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 548
^

Looking Good!
     
     
  #476  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2007, 3:38 AM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by UberAlles View Post
I working on a map of current construction for building over 45 floors. I don't have much time to work on it, but will add content as I have time.

http://www.boca-del-mar.com/publish/map.htm
That is awesome. Great job so far.
     
     
  #477  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2007, 4:01 AM
brian_b brian_b is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by brian_b View Post
I'm nearly positive that the sign at 120 N Jefferson advertising an office building has been replaced with a for sale sign.

I can check on that in the next day or two.
Walked by and yes, the sign has been changed to a for sale sign. Probably a dead project.
     
     
  #478  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2007, 5:14 AM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,588
155 N Wacker

Buck doesn't stop
Developer seeks OK for third tower on Wacker

December 15, 2006
BY DAVID ROEDER AND FRAN SPIELMAN Staff Reporters
Developer John Buck, the leading force in the transformation of Wacker Drive into the city's hottest office destination, is at it again.

Buck has requested city approval to build a 50-story building at 155 N. Wacker, the northeast corner of Wacker and Randolph.

It would be Buck's third new development on Wacker and follow design and financial formulas he used in earlier efforts at 1 N. and 111 S. Wacker.

Both were built to the specifications of legal, accounting or financial services firms that typically want the prestige of new, technologically updated office space. They sign as anchors, and Buck leases out the balance of the space, selling the building after it's filled with creditworthy tenants.

The zoning application contains plans for a 1.1-million-square-foot building with 177 parking spaces. It would replace a 10-story building at 155 N. Wacker and a low-rise at 312 W. Randolph. Its height is listed as 644 feet.

The development site would go right up to one of the quirkier buildings still in the Loop, the tiny Showmen's League of America home at 300 W. Randolph, decorated with sculptures of elephants. Buck is known to covet the site.

The new building will be the work of Goettsch Partners Inc., the architectural firm that produced the other Wacker buildings for Buck.

Asked if the Showmen's League site is part of the plan, Steven Nilles, partner at the Goettsch firm, said, "Not yet." He said the final design is still under review.

Buck executives could not be reached. Asked about a construction timetable, Nilles would say only, "We have been given a directive to proceed" with the work.

A building started next year could be completed in 2009.

Sources have said the law firm Skadden Arps Meagher & Flom, currently at 333 W. Wacker, has agreed to lease about 175,000 square feet in the building. Buck has been seeking other sizable tenants.

The 111 S. Wacker was notable for receiving a "gold" rating for its environmental attributes under the LEED program sponsored by the U.S. Green Building Council. It was the first building not designed for a single tenant that earned the rating, and Nilles said he'll try again for the designation at 155 N. Wacker.

[email protected]
     
     
  #479  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2007, 5:17 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
40-Story Michigan/Randolph Tower

To anyone who attended the Grant Park Advisory Council meeting tonight, were any new renderings released of this ultra-slender design from SCB? Any new info? Did the developers give a construction timetable? This one will give new meaning to the phrase "tight construction site"...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #480  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2007, 5:44 AM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
Roosevelt Collection Tower

Looks like Roosevelt Collection, including the 43-story phase I tower, showed up on bidclerk.com today. Construction is still estimated to begin in March.


http://www.bidclerk.com/projects/projectDetail.jsp?projectID=419576
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:43 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.