HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #441  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2007, 6:11 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,340
Man, Streeterville is just flying upwards now, it's crazy how much things have grown since I was just down there in November.
But what is that blue cladding on Avenue East? Is that an underlayer, or is that the final outer surface?
     
     
  #442  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2007, 6:36 PM
denizen467 denizen467 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,212
^ Maybe they are reprising the diving whale mural.
     
     
  #443  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2007, 6:38 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,575
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
It's okay. I'd like to see more detailed renderings. Whenever things are at such a great distance like this rendering, it's really hard to tell whether you like something or not. Anyway, I know you'll all like the height. The 48-story floor number isn't a typo.

The roof height is 542'-8" according to the PD Application. Of coursewell get more solid numbers once we look at the blueprints.
LOVE the height!! Very pleasant surprise...
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
     
     
  #444  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2007, 8:19 PM
chicubs111 chicubs111 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,249
im not surprised at that height considering the number of units the building has and that it will also contain some office space.
     
     
  #445  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2007, 9:31 PM
chicubs111 chicubs111 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,249
Higher rents ahead
Tenants can expect fewer breaks as landlords gain edge

Attorney Steven Weiss, whose firm recently relocated, says landlords were reluctant to negotiate or to sweeten offers. Photo: Stephen J. Serio
Vacancies are dropping at downtown office buildings — good news for landlords but bad news for prospective tenants looking for breaks on rent.
The brighter times for landlords may be short-lived, however, as five new high-rises are set to open by late 2009. The almost 4.4 million square feet of additional office space from the new buildings will push vacancy rates to about 16%, from around 14% this year, according to a report by John Buck Co.'s Strategic Advisory Group.

Rents on premium office space are expected to climb about 6% this year to their highest level since 2002, the report by Buck's tenant-representation group shows.

Landlords welcome any good news in a market where vacancies remain high and rents are still below where they were five years ago.

"We were tired of getting our brains beat in," says C. J. Dempsey, vice-president of leasing for Chicago-based Equity Office Properties Trust, which owns seven office buildings downtown. "The tide has definitely turned."

Attorney Steven Weiss, chairman of business litigation firm Schopf & Weiss LLP, says landlords were reluctant to negotiate or sweeten offers while he was looking for a new location last year. The 22-lawyer firm moved in December from 312 W. Randolph St. to 1 S. Wacker Drive, where it is leasing an entire floor.

"Landlords felt things were moving in their direction over time, so they weren't quite as anxious to get deals done quickly," says Mr. Weiss, who led the search, which began in late 2005. "There wasn't as much flexibility as we expected."

However, most landlords were still offering money for interior improvements as well as six to 12 months of free rent, he says. Such perks, which became commonplace when the market soured for landlords in 2002, were even more generous a couple of years ago.

The office market's momentum and weakening demand for downtown condos prompted Prime Group Realty Trust, a Chicago-based real estate investment trust, to scrap plans to convert some floors at its 330 N. Wabash Ave. building to condos.

The building, formerly known as IBM Plaza, is losing its largest tenant, law firm Jenner & Block LLP, to one of the new buildings opening in 2009. Jenner is vacating about 20% of the building's total space. IBM vacated a similar amount of space in 2006.

Some investors are betting the Chicago office market will continue to improve. Sales of office towers last year eclipsed $5 billion, shattering the previous high of $3.3 billion set in 2005.

GE Asset Management Inc. was among the buyers last year, acquiring 181 W. Madison St. for $294 million, and now owns three office towers here — the most since GE entered the market in the 1980s, Managing Director Jerry Karr says.

The company had a banner year with its marquee Chicago property, Citigroup Center, at 500 W. Madison St., where GE signed new leases and renewed existing ones totaling 330,000 square feet — almost a quarter of the entire office space.

"We see Chicago as a major investment market," Mr. Karr says. "Has it been the place that has seen the most appreciation the last couple years? No. That's all the more reason I like Chicago. We believe that Chicago's turn is coming."




http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/mag/article.pl?article_id=27088&postDate=2007-01-13
     
     
  #446  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 12:34 AM
Marvel 33's Avatar
Marvel 33 Marvel 33 is offline
"The World is my Oyster"
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 943
^ Speaking of 155 N Wacker. You can find a small update on that project at NewcitySkyline News and a rendering of the new design.
__________________
CHICAGO
Also known as:
The Windy City - The City of Broad Shoulders - Chitown - City in a Garden - Gem of the Prairie - Second City - The "I Will" City
_________________________________
Architectural News At: NewcitySkyline.com
     
     
  #447  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 12:46 AM
chicubs111 chicubs111 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,249
looking at the new design for 155 N wacker..the building looks about 13 stories taller than 191 n wacker...I would think the building would be really close to 700ft tall..but if i can remember somone said i would be in the lower 600ft range?
     
     
  #448  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 1:03 AM
Pandemonious's Avatar
Pandemonious Pandemonious is offline
Chaos Machine
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,290
155 should be over 650 ft. It should end up being very similar in height to Hyatt Center (48 stories) or RR Donnelly (49 stories), both of which are shy of 700 feet.
__________________
My Diagram: http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?m2346
     
     
  #449  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 1:31 AM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvel 33 View Post
^ Speaking of 155 N Wacker. You can find a small update on that project at NewcitySkyline News and a rendering of the new design.

Thanks for the update! That sucks that it lost two floors and is no longer asymmetrical, but I am glad that they appear to be trying to differentiate it a bit from the previous two Buck (two-buck?) towers.
     
     
  #450  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 2:24 AM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
Couple more taken from the architect's site



     
     
  #451  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 7:37 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by honte View Post
Thanks for the update! That sucks that it lost two floors and is no longer asymmetrical, but I am glad that they appear to be trying to differentiate it a bit from the previous two Buck (two-buck?) towers.
It's okay... Nothing special.. To be honest, I'm tired of these mediocre 50 story office towers.

Seeing as Daley wants downtown to become a 24-hour destination, I would change the zoning codes or something to either persuade or force developers to build several floors of residential atop their buildings.---i.e. an office worker pulls an all nighter, instead of the long drive back to Shaumburg, they could just go upstairs to their crash-pad

just an idea....
__________________
titanic1
     
     
  #452  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 7:52 AM
honte honte is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago - every nook and cranny
Posts: 4,628
^ I'm definitely down with that idea. I've been thinking about it a lot - if just one of these Buck / Hines towers got together with one of our residential towers, you could easily have another JHC on your hands. Especially along the river, residential seems like a given.

One would think the taller building would be more recognizable and more prestigious, no? I wonder if the office users see the mixed use as a negative?
     
     
  #453  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 1:37 PM
Chi_Coruscant Chi_Coruscant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 485
http://www.chicagotribune.com/classified/realestate/realestate/chi-0701140463jan14,1,2371969.story

Mixed-use building to have 389 apartments

By Jeanette Almada
Special to the Tribune
Published January 14, 2007

A 49-story mixed-use building with 389 rental apartments is slated for West Washington Street near Wells Street in the West Loop.

An affiliate of Chicago-based Jupiter Realty Corp. will develop the project on a 32,509-square-foot site at 205-215 W. Washington St. and 30 N. Wells St.

High-rise office buildings stand just west and south of the site, and two residential buildings are across Washington Street.

Jupiter is under contract to buy the land. "We expect to close on the land by late January," said Michael Pompizzi, president of Jupiter.

The City Council approved the project as a planned development in December, according to Pompizzi.

Aside from a two-story commercial building on the east end of the site, the parcel is vacant. That building will be demolished, Pompizzi said.

Jupiter will develop a 49-story building with 14,000 square feet of ground-floor retail space and enclosed parking for up to 600 cars (221 for use by tenants and 379 for public use).

Studio, efficiency and 1-, 2- and 3-bedroom apartments with 540 to 1,980 square feet of space will occupy floors 14 through 49, Pompizzi said.

"We expect our tenants will be young people who want to live near transportation centers and places of employment--young professionals, potentially some students because there are close to 60,000 students in the area. It is also likely that there would be demand for some amount of corporate apartments there," Pompizzi said.

Chicago-based Solomon Cordwell Buenz designed the building.

"We expect to start construction in fall 2007," Pompizzi said.
     
     
  #454  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 2:37 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,044
155 N Wacker

     
     
  #455  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 2:53 PM
chicubs111 chicubs111 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,249
I like this building although i wish i would break into the mid 700 ft range to add a little peak to the wacker drive canyon...Also that 49 story juniper project , I dont think we got an accurate height figure in ft, i remember emporis has somewhere in the mid to upper 400ft range but that was based on its original height of 42 stories...I think this one can break 500ft.
     
     
  #456  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 3:02 PM
DANTHEDISCOMAN's Avatar
DANTHEDISCOMAN DANTHEDISCOMAN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Downtown
Posts: 134
That lobby and the sidewalk engraving is hideous.
     
     
  #457  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 3:31 PM
rds989's Avatar
rds989 rds989 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 374
^The extension of the lobby marble pattern into the exterior sidewalk is exactly the same as at 111 S. Wacker.

The similarities between the two other Buck buildings on Wacker (1 North and 111 South) are striking. The interior lobby details are nearly the same, the glass walls on the exterior lobbies are nearly the same, etc. I think both are beautiful buildings (I work in 111 S.), and a 3d one is welcome, as far as I'm concerned.
__________________
rds989
     
     
  #458  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 4:00 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,946
It's getting a little boring, but this is still going to be a solid building.
     
     
  #459  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 4:39 PM
Sir Isaac Newton Sir Isaac Newton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 315
I like the building a lot. Granted, I wouldn't object if they added 10 or 20 more floors to it, but I still can't complain. The article didn't mention numerous other proposed office buildings for the loop: 29-39 South LaSalle, 222 West Randolph, Wacker Plaza, ABN Amro Tower II, Madison West Tower II, and 120 North Jefferson. Maybe all of these won't be completed by 2009, but I would imagine that at least one or two would be.
     
     
  #460  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2007, 6:04 PM
Chi_Coruscant Chi_Coruscant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 485
Hey, whatever happened to proposed 20-39 LaSalle? Was it send back to drawing board? Or is it dead?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:40 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.