HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Dec 23, 2006, 1:02 AM
IKAN104's Avatar
IKAN104 IKAN104 is offline
Big Dog
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by murman View Post
The Stationlands concept is so fundamentally flawed in design, layout, proposed use, location, ad infinitum, that it's not even funny. There are so many other superior sites downtown for EACH of the uses proposed at Stationlands. Agglomerating them all into a tertiary location just doesn't make sense. Why Qualico doesn't realize this just astounds me, and from my perspective furthers my opinion that they really just haven't got a clue of what to do and therefore cannot be expected to exectute a viable project.
Interesting perspective. When I last spoke to Ken Cantor he said they would not even consider changing the design of the building because it is such a versatile design that it would work for any type of tenant. That is the thing he is most proud of regarding Stationlands and when it goes ahead it will go ahead exactly as planned.
__________________
-There's always a better way-
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:41 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.