Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer
The breakdown of social order and failure to enforce the law or punish crime is making life harder for poor people. Do gooders think they are helping by not punishing shop lifting and other petty crime, but poor areas are left without accessible services.
Similarly people blame "Big Grocery" for high food prices rather than considering the impact rampant shoplifting, supply management, over regulation and taxes.
|
Like most complex issues, it's a variety of factors (especially grocery prices). In terms of the crime aspect, it's no coincidence that crime spikes when cost of living increases (the root cause is not people wanting to cause crime, but rather the act of crime being more attractive due to costs otherwise pricing people out of basic stuff). Obviously there will always be
some crime in society. But non-violent crime does jump when cost of living jumps.
Interestingly, though, harsher punishments/enforcements do not actually have an effect on crime. This makes sense is the root cause is cost of living, which is outside a person's control, and not a calculated desire to cause crime:
https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/pnshnt-rcdvsm/index-en.aspx
So having stronger enforcement/more police/longer sentences likely won't do anything to prevent shoplifting. On the extreme end, if you (in advance) gave every shoplifter an extra $2,000/mo in free cash, they likely wouldn't steal as much. This makes sense, because they could just buy things and avoid any risk. That's an extreme solution, obviously, and I'm just making it to point out that lack of money is generally the root of nonviolent crime (for theft). The big solution is to bring down cost of living (or conversely, increase wages). The problem is that this requires cooperation of federal and provincial levels of government (which is almost impossible in Canada), and then also having the luck to not be in a global downturn, etc.