HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9181  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2026, 2:56 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
Would you let this go? The suburbs are funding much of the transit system through transit levies, and service has already been cut substantially in the suburbs. The result has been ridership loss and more congested roads.
The result of the entire way in which transit is funded, both through the levy and through fare structure, has been a cross-subsidy from denser parts of the urban transit area to the less-dense suburban parts of the urban transit area.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9182  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2026, 4:43 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,518
OC Transpo scaling back some bus, train routes this summer
Airport service on Line 4 halved to every 24 minutes on weekends

CBC News
Posted: Jun 19, 2026 12:34 PM EDT | Last Updated: 8 minutes ago


OC Transpo says it's scaling back service on some bus routes and Line 4 of the O-Train over the summer as it tries to get its staffing and maintenance back in order.

The summer schedule covering June 28-Aug. 29 reflects longer-term efforts to boost reliability under OC Transpo's new general manager Rick Leary.

"During the summer, a preventative maintenance campaign will prepare the fleet for increased ridership in September and the return of harsh winter weather," Leary wrote in a memo Thursday.

"This means that there will be reduced frequency on some routes, which will result in increased travel times, particularly on weekends."

He mentioned but did not name 22 routes.

Line 4 serving South Keys, Uplands and Airport stations will cut frequency on weekends for the foreseeable future, with trains every 24 minutes instead of every 12.

Frequency could be restored to five trains an hour during events at the Cohere Centre. Route 105 buses remain available between the Ottawa International Airport and St-Laurent station.

"This schedule adjustment is temporary and ensures we can provide a reliable service for customers while we continue to stabilize staffing levels through hiring and training," the memo said.

Members of the city's transit committee got an update earlier this month on an ongoing shortage of train operators, bus drivers and mechanics.

There will be more Route 98 buses between Hurdman station and the Greenboro area on Sunday mornings, plus unspecified changes to Route 11 between downtown and Bayshore to offer "more predictable travel times."

Leary also flagged free transit on July 1 with special schedule service for Canada Day, extended and expanded O-Train service in the evenings during Bluesfest, a modified Saturday schedule for the Aug. 3 civic holiday, and construction that may affect travel around Bayshore and Walkley stations.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/oc-transpo-bus-train-summer-schedule-change-cuts-9.7241707
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9183  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2026, 6:26 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,747
And the bad news just continues and continues. Why did we bother building Line 4 when we are delivering less frequency and slower travel times than the buses that it replaced? How can the rest of Phase 2 ever be opened when we can't man what we are currently running? This problem has existed since Phase 1 opened in 2019 and we have never been able to hire enough people in the past 7 years. I cannot fathom what the city is doing. Has OC become that bad of employer?

Did you know that Route 105 has been extended to Limebank Station for a couple of trips in the early mornings? The airport authority has clout, because airport workers from Riverside South and Barrhaven couldn't get to work on time. But nobody cares if you can't use the train for morning flights? The average resident has zero clout.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9184  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2026, 2:56 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,518
OC Transpo bus route audit called 'validation' for frustrated riders
"It's what people have been saying since New Ways to Bus first came to life."

By Aedan Helmer, Ottawa Citizen
Published Jun 19, 2026 | Last updated 5 hours ago


A scathing audit of OC Transpo’s “New Ways to Bus” has validated many of the concerns riders and councillors have expressed since the bus route overhaul was implemented last year, the audit committee heard Friday.

The report was formally tabled at the June 19 committee as councillors called the auditor general’s report “significant validation” for riders who had long complained about the overhaul that made sweeping changes to more than 100 bus routes.

The bus route overhaul was implemented in April 2025 and was designed to improve connectivity to community hubs and to align bus service with O-Train Lines 2 and 4, which launched in January 2025. At the time, OC Transpo’s then-general manager, Renée Amilcar, said the bus route redesign would give customers “a more reliable and efficient system.”

Auditor General Nathalie Gougeon and her team performed an extensive audit of the route overhaul, however, and found it was “mainly driven by budget considerations” as a cost-cutting exercise to reduce annual operating costs by $10 million — equivalent to a reduction of 70,000 bus service hours per year.

The audit also found that New Ways to Bus was based on outdated data collected in 2023 that had not accounted for Ottawa’s evolving post-pandemic traffic patterns and increased road congestion by the time it rolled out on April 27, 2025.

Kitchissippi Coun. Jeff Leiper said the audit was “very welcome.”

“Riders feel seen,” Leiper told the committee. “We undertook a cost-cutting exercise for what I think is a relatively small amount of money — $10 million in the context of the larger OC Transpo operational budget — and we cut 70,000 operation hours.

“The frequency of routes suffered, the coverage of routes suffered, and we didn’t get the reliability improvements that we were hoping to achieve from the exercise. Riders already knew that, but (this) audit is significant validation for them,” Leiper said.

“It’s what people have been saying since New Ways to Bus first came to life, and it’s nice to see it acknowledged that it was more of a cutting exercise than an improvement to the service provided,” said Kanata South Coun. Allan Hubley, vice-chair of the audit committee. “It affected people’s daily commutes to work and to home right from the start, and it hasn’t gotten better.”

Rick Leary, who took over as OC Transpo general manager in March, said the audit also validated the 10-point action plan he had since implemented to improve reliability across the transit network.

“As the audit outlines, our schedules don’t reflect current traffic conditions,” Leary acknowledged. “Work to address these began early this year … We’ve already begun adding times to the schedules for seven routes and we’ve seen significant improvements to reliability.”

OC Transpo will be making adjustments by adding run time to 30 routes by September, Leary said, which will increase reliability metrics on routes used by 50 per cent of OC Transpo customers.

“We’re going to continue to review and analyze all routes based on current travel patterns, customer and councillor feedback and make adjustments to schedules to deliver the service that we advertise,” Leary told the audit committee.

“We’re better leveraging the technology to support improvements to our planning, monitoring, and reporting on the service we provide, (and) this data will help us better refine our routes and schedules to continue to drive improvements to our customer experience.”

Leary said reliable service was dependent on “realistic schedules, the right number of operators and dependable vehicles.”

OC Transpo is undertaking a “proactive” maintenance campaign this summer to prepare its aging fleet for a spike in ridership in the fall and to maintain service through harsh winter conditions. There are now 132 electric buses in service and a “fleet plan” will be presented to the transit committee in early 2027, Leary said.

Noah Vineberg, president of Amalgamated Transit Union Local 279, said union officials had been raising the same issues identified in the audit to management for years.

“We were told that we were wrong. We were told that it was a shortage of bus operators, leaving out the lack of bus procurement, ignoring the people that deliver the service, proper updates and analysis and any semblance of transparency,” Vineberg said.

Service cuts were “disguised with flashy PowerPoint presentations, colorful taglines like ‘route optimization’ and ‘New Ways to Bus.’

“It was misleading, it was wrong and it was insulting” to blame OC Transpo’s reliability issues on drivers, he said. When cancelled routes were blamed on driver shortages, Vineberg said it implied that drivers were calling in sick or otherwise unavailable to complete their routes.

“It is not that we are missing people and we are absolutely not missing people willing to work,” Vineberg said. “What they call driver shortage is when they need to cancel a trip because they poorly planned it.”

Trips would be cancelled because federally mandated recovery time for drivers did not allow for the next trip, Vineberg said, which would be logged as a cancelled trip due to a lack of driver availability.

“That is an excuse. It’s a scapegoat,” Vineberg said. “Our members took the public’s anger in person and online for decisions they never made and had no power to stop.”

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/oc-transpo-audit-called-validation
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9185  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2026, 11:36 AM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 28,796
Lol. And these guys think they deserve high profile organizations like the DSRB here. Can't even maintain a stable bus schedule.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9186  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2026, 5:20 AM
YOWetal YOWetal is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
Lol. And these guys think they deserve high profile organizations like the DSRB here. Can't even maintain a stable bus schedule.
You think our bus reliablity is a key factor?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9187  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2026, 2:58 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 28,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by YOWetal View Post
You think our bus reliablity is a key factor?
As someone involved in siting another facility with a decent amount of jobs (I won't give an exact number that would dox me), I will say that the list of priority questions includes:

1) How much parking?
2) What is transit connectivity?

And the less transit connectivity you have, the higher your parking provision better be. Cause if we have to pay to add parking, your real estate is worth less to us.

If some low level peon like me involved in building a beige box for uniforms is thinking about this, I would be absolutely shocked if someone planning the HQ of a multi-billion dollar organization isn't considering things like this. Sure, it's probably not as high on the list and there are other tradeoffs to consider. But the more failings a candidate city has, the far more impressive your lobbying has. Just like how I don't think DND should pay as much for shit locations in this city.

I really don't think people understand how the commuting issues at Carling have literally changed how people think about siting across DND and probably the wider government. There is no project team that wants Carling 2.0 on their resume.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9188  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2026, 4:18 AM
YOWetal YOWetal is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,619
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
As someone involved in siting another facility with a decent amount of jobs (I won't give an exact number that would dox me), I will say that the list of priority questions includes:

1) How much parking?
2) What is transit connectivity?

And the less transit connectivity you have, the higher your parking provision better be. Cause if we have to pay to add parking, your real estate is worth less to us.

If some low level peon like me involved in building a beige box for uniforms is thinking about this, I would be absolutely shocked if someone planning the HQ of a multi-billion dollar organization isn't considering things like this. Sure, it's probably not as high on the list and there are other tradeoffs to consider. But the more failings a candidate city has, the far more impressive your lobbying has. Just like how I don't think DND should pay as much for shit locations in this city.

I really don't think people understand how the commuting issues at Carling have literally changed how people think about siting across DND and probably the wider government. There is no project team that wants Carling 2.0 on their resume.
Yes but provide enough parking for everyone at Carling and the issue goes away. Yes if it was at Tunney's pasture or somewhere well connected the parking wouldn't be an issue either but enough parking is the first and easier solution.

A downtown location for a new institution won't be worried about the delays in better ways to bus connections. They will tell them it's X meters from LRT and move on. People who relocate will live in central suburbs. But yes it's hard to imagine Ottawa is in the running at all for this tbh.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9189  
Old Posted Jun 23, 2026, 2:37 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,747
Quote:
OC Transpo will be making adjustments by adding run time to 30 routes by September, Leary said, which will increase reliability metrics on routes used by 50 per cent of OC Transpo customers.
Quote:
“The frequency of routes suffered, the coverage of routes suffered, and we didn’t get the reliability improvements that we were hoping to achieve from the exercise. Riders already knew that, but (this) audit is significant validation for them,” Leiper said.
As you see from the above quotes, only the reliability issue is being dealt with. Even then, to address reliability, we need to increase travel times. Necessary, but not fully addressing the entire problem.

From a rider perspective frequency and coverage are also issues that were created by 'New Ways to Bus'. And I will add another, too many transfers required to make a trip.

It is better than nothing to finally address the reliability issue, but still, we are not addressing the other major issues that make trips too long to complete. Too many trips involve taking three or more vehicles, and even with reliability improvements, still makes trips too slow and unpredictable. Understanding transfers and their limitations becomes too difficult for the average rider when there is more than one transfer to complete your trip. We say that Phase 2 will address some of this, but I think we will be stuck with many local bus routes not reaching the rail head particularly in Kanata-Stittsville and Barrhaven.

Ultimately, we need to go steps further by speeding up service across the board and part of this means eliminating some transfers with more direct bus routes that don't always just drop you at the closest train station and improving frequency on more key routes.

I have also argued for years that rail has deferred indefinitely other important transit improvements such as the Baseline BRT and even the introduction of Bus lanes and other measures, which become more and more important as our roads become more and more congested.

That seems such a distant possibility after years of neglect, and service cut after service cut, that the city mostly glossed over. Often temporary service cuts that were never reinstated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9190  
Old Posted Jun 24, 2026, 2:52 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,518
OC Transpo to cancel dozens of school route trips, affecting 3,600 students
Cut frees up 20 buses for regular service, but leaves yellow bus provider in 'significant timeline crunch'

Arthur White-Crummey · CBC News
Posted: Jun 24, 2026 4:00 AM EDT | Last Updated: 7 hours ago


Thousands of Ottawa students will shift from articulated buses to yellow ones come September, as OC Transpo cancels dozens of trips on school routes that risked monopolizing its dwindling fleet of high-capacity vehicles.

Ottawa Student Transportation Authority (OSTA) general manager Jennifer Borrel-Benoit said she got the news late last month that OC Transpo is cancelling 45 trips, affecting more than 2,100 students at English-language boards.

She said her team had to quickly find yellow buses and drivers to fill the gap, leaving the authority in "a significant timeline crunch in the middle of our peak planning season."

Patrick Pharand, director of the Consortium de transport scolaire d’Ottawa (CTSO), said OC Transpo is also cancelling trips to French-language public schools in Barrhaven and Orléans. He said about 1,500 students at those schools will be transitioning to yellow buses when the new school year begins.

The cancellations should allow OC Transpo to return about 20 buses to service elsewhere in the system.

OC Transpo provides more than 70 school routes, with numbers between 600 and 699, that shuttle middle and high school students to and from school.

Some make just two trips a day — one in the morning and one in the afternoon — while others make more, often at some of the busiest times of the day.

Those trips have competed for a short supply of buses, an issue that came into focus during an audit committee meeting last week that considered a scathing report into OC Transpo’s bus scheduling.

<more>

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/oc...trips-affecting-3-600-students-9.7246096
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9191  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2026, 11:38 AM
eltodesukane eltodesukane is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,144
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9192  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2026, 2:32 PM
Catenary Catenary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by eltodesukane View Post
The one at Bayshore has been smashed more often than not. There is something to be said for the STO style ones which are like a tiny version of the LED panels in the train stations, overhead and out of reach.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9193  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2026, 4:00 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catenary View Post
There is something to be said for the STO style ones which are like a tiny version of the LED panels in the train stations, overhead and out of reach.
Also: generally accurate, unlike the absolute trash disinformation that OC Transpo presents as being accurate, real-time data.

STO really needs to install its devices at a couple of the major downtown Hull-bound Ottawa stops, though.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9194  
Old Posted Jun 25, 2026, 9:43 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,518
I worry about the competence of people running OC Transpo
The Auditor General’s report on Ottawa's "New Ways to Bus" plan shows it ended something closer to No Ways to Bus.

By Randall Denley, Ottawa Citizen
Published Jun 24, 2026 | 3 minute read


The latest Ottawa auditor general’s report on OC Transpo is quite the catalogue of managerial incompetence. The question is whether the appointment of new general manager Rick Leary is a sufficient fix.

The focus of Auditor General Nathalie Gougeon’s report is the city’s New Ways to Bus plan, which took effect last year. It will come as no surprise to bus riders that the plan was a flop, based on outdated data and overly optimistic assumptions about the service level beleaguered OC Transpo could provide.

Transit general manager Renée Amilcar promised riders “a more reliable and efficient system.” Instead, they got something closer to No Ways to Bus.

Conceptually, the plan crafted by former transit boss Amilcar and her staff made sense. Bus routes should have been adjusted to accommodate light rail service and changed to beef up the most important routes and make better connections between buses and rail.

Much has been made of service changes that eliminated $10 million in costs, but the change was small relative to the budget. The city will still spend $419 million on bus service this year, $11 million more than it did in 2025.

Despite rider dissatisfaction, the new bus service model could still have been defended if the decisions behind it had been based on thoughtful policies and realistic assumptions. They weren’t and that’s the fundamental problem.

The AG found that OC Transpo lacked a way to assess competing priorities. Was the goal the greatest possible service volume or a smaller, more reliable service? What was realistically possible given the delayed arrival of new electric buses and consequent fleet shortages?

The basic policy documents that lay out the parameters for service hadn’t been significantly updated since 2005, the auditor found. Transpo was using grossly out of date standards for acceptable distance from bus service and cost share split between riders and taxpayers.

The overall impression is of a lackadaisical approach to management. It’s a perception bolstered by another audit earlier this year that found the OC Transpo management positions filled by candidates who didn’t meet the minimum requirements for their jobs but were chosen anyway.

To be fair, significant external factors contributed to the failure of New Ways to Bus. Electric buses ordered by the city did not arrive when expected. That meant the city had to rely on aging diesel buses far longer than anticipated. Even though there were known issues with unreliable bus schedules, Transpo didn’t have enough buses to fix the problem.

The biggest challenge of all was the litany of problems that afflicted Ottawa’s new LRT. Perhaps staff were so busy struggling with LRT issues that they didn’t have time to do their basic jobs properly on the bus side.

One also had to note that OC Transpo management didn’t achieve this on their own. Where was the oversight from the city’s transit commission?

In summary, OC Transpo management had promised more than they could reasonably deliver, and the work behind their new bus plan seemed haphazard.

The city has welcomed the auditor general’s recommendations, as it usually does, and vowed to implement them. New transit boss Leary says Gougeon’s recommendations are in line with a 10-point plan he has already announced. Some route adjustments are already under way.

No doubt senior transit staff and councillors seeking re-election would like you to think the city’s transit problems are under control, but that’s a premature conclusion.

Yes, the top person at the city transit operation has changed, but what about the people who work with him? How do people whose very job is planning service routes and levels make such a hash of it over a prolonged period of time and fail to even develop a realistic template for decisions on service levels?

Leary was brought in as the new broom at OC Transpo. He has some sweeping to do.


Randall Denley is an Ottawa journalist and author. Contact him at [email protected]

https://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/i-worry-about-the-competence-of-people-running-oc-transpo-opinion
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9195  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2026, 1:51 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catenary View Post
The one at Bayshore has been smashed more often than not. There is something to be said for the STO style ones which are like a tiny version of the LED panels in the train stations, overhead and out of reach.
But how do you put them put of reach when they are on an urban street? Attach them to private buildings, which would probably require some sort of long term financial agreement?

Obviously we need to find someway to protect these, like a plexiglass cage or something, which would impact legibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
I worry about the competence of people running OC Transpo
The Auditor General’s report on Ottawa's "New Ways to Bus" plan shows it ended something closer to No Ways to Bus.

By Randall Denley, Ottawa Citizen
Published Jun 24, 2026 | 3 minute read
[/I]

https://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/i-worry-about-the-competence-of-people-running-oc-transpo-opinion
Luckily, one of the most incompetent people left.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9196  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2026, 2:21 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,001
The nerds at Better Transit are doing some spectacular work:

https://bettertransitottawa.ca/tracker/scheduleChange
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9197  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2026, 3:42 PM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 2,586
Interesting! Thanks for providing the link, Uhuniau. And thanks to Better Transit for putting together the numbers.

NO THANKS to OC Transpo for the scheduling – assuming that Better Transit has accurate numbers.

Gap times for a route are all over the place. A customer can’t count on a bus coming at, say, 15-minutes after the hours, for example. The scheduled time could be 15 after, but it could be 10 after, or 20 after. It bounces around for successive buses. That means that customers NEED to look at the schedule EVERY TIME they need to go to the bus stop (if they don’t go at exactly the same time each day).

Then there is the scheduling of buses together. Why in heck would they schedule a route with gaps of 28-minutes, followed by the next bus (same number) 2-minutes later, then 28-minutes, 2-minutes . . .? Why would OC Transpo schedule the buses to actually be timed to be bunched?

Here’s a super weird idea for OC Transpo: Make the gap times consistent, and schedule the buses to minimize those gaps – AS EQUALLY AS PRACTICAL. In other words, schedule the buses to make it easy for customers.

Oh, and FIRE the person who is trying to sabotage OC Transpo by scheduling the buses to provide the worst possible service.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9198  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2026, 4:16 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,001
Scheduling and consistency etc. require transit priority measures that the city is financially and politically unwilling to move forward on.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9199  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2026, 7:31 PM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 2,586
Yeah . . . No. Yes, there is a lack of funds to acquire resources and modify roads to HELP buses run consistently – but, no, when the buses are scheduled WRONG, that is a scheduling problem.

For example; the west-bound # 88 is scheduled to leave Hurdman at one-minutes after the quarter hour. That is GOOD scheduling. There will be a bus every 15-minutes, or so.

However, the east-bound trips of the # 88, from Bayshore can be 15 minutes apart, but they may not be. At 19:01, there are two (yes, 2) # 88 buses to leave at the same time. Then there is a 30-minute gap! Why? Those two buses are actually scheduled to run as a pair.

OK, you might say that they don’t have enough BIG buses to ensure that a high-capacity bus is on that run, so they are sending two (maybe) regular buses on that run. (OC Transpo will have the statistics about whether extra capacity is always needed for that run.) But what about the person who arrives at 19:02? They get to wait until 19:31.

However, the person arriving at 19:32 is in luck. Because the next # 88 is scheduled to leave 2-minutes after, at 19:33! Bus don’t miss that one, or you will wait until 20:01.

If the west-bound # 88 buses leave every 15-minutes, then why are the east-bound buses not similar? Why do they jump into a ‘bunching pattern’; with a second bus leaving very close to the first – ensuring a double-long wait for the third? During the mid-day, the ‘bunching’ is scheduled as 26-minutes, and 4-minutes – only slightly better.

Of course, the # 68 – which is the western portion of the old # 88 route, before ‘No Way To Bus’ broke that line – is still scheduled to run every 14-16 minutes; meaning that it no longer dove-tails well with the east-bound # 88.

These are scheduling issues. They did not deliberately schedule bunching to counter road congestion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9200  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2026, 1:21 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,518
Software problem keeps some electric OC Transpo buses off the road
Issue caused buses to charge 'at a slower rate than normal,' says transit official

Kimberley Molina · CBC News
Posted: Jun 27, 2026 4:23 PM EDT | Last Updated: June 27


A software problem prevented dozens of OC Transpo's electric buses from hitting the roads Saturday morning.

The issue kept 133 buses at the St. Laurent garage from charging properly overnight, leaving them unready for the start of service, the city told CBC in an email.

As a result, drivers and maintenance staff were forced to relocate Saturday morning to other garages not normally open on weekends, said Noah Vineberg, president of Amalgamated Transit Union Local 279.

"[It was] a scramble just for operators to be able to get to buses as quickly as possible and on time in order to serve the public," he said.

The software issue "caused some electric buses to charge at a slower rate than normal," wrote Troy Charter, the city's associate general manager of transit services, in an email.

OC Transpo used shuttles to take operators to different garages, Charter said, and also deployed a number of buses not typically used on weekends.

That "quick action" minimized disruptions for riders, he said.

The affected electric buses still had enough power to move about the garage, the city said.

Vineberg said it took extra time to get buses on the roads Saturday, partly due to how they're parked in the garages.

"You can imagine a lot of these are are stationed in a garage bumper-to-bumper in all their charging portals," he said.

"So even if even if it's only a certain amount of them that [didn't charge properly], the way they line up inside of [the garage] would affect whether or not they can go out."

The software problem has been addressed, Charter wrote, and buses are charging normally now.

Monitoring is in place and no further service impacts are expected, he said, adding the city will review what happened.

While the issues appeared to have been resolved by the afternoon, Vineberg said the problem serves as a lesson that there needs to be better contingency plan in place.

He also said he's surprised a warning system doesn't exist if there's a failure with the charging system.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/electric-bus-failure-oc-transpo-9.7251497
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:58 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.