HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #601  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2026, 2:36 PM
urbanforest urbanforest is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 314
I'd imagine aerial recon would provide enough information for them to determine if they wanted to proceed with acquisitions in instances like this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #602  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2026, 3:07 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanforest View Post
I'd imagine aerial recon would provide enough information for them to determine if they wanted to proceed with acquisitions in instances like this.
Some parts in that area are landslide-prone so I prefer that Alto actually manage to get in and take some bore hole data.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #603  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2026, 4:43 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by BanjoUnchained View Post
In an interview with the CBC in March the CEO said:

"They will say no thanks and we'll see you later on, because at one point in time we'll have to have access to this, otherwise we cannot build it. I’m not a private project, I’m representing the state. I’m doing this for the public good. That’s why I’m asking for the collaboration of everyone, because we need this. It has to be built somewhere."
What a moron. Alto is Crown Corporation without any enabling legislation that give it any powers to do anything. Neither Alto nor its parent company (Via) are Agents of the Crown.

https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-...ons/agent-status-crown-corporations.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #604  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2026, 4:49 PM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 2,586
Since the property owners have told ALTO that it is NOT ALLOWED to enter the property, Would AIR-RIGHTS also prevent ALTO’s use of drones across those properties? I don’t know what the limits are on air-rights, so I am asking.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #605  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2026, 5:12 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Eade View Post
Since the property owners have told ALTO that it is NOT ALLOWED to enter the property, Would AIR-RIGHTS also prevent ALTO’s use of drones across those properties? I don’t know what the limits are on air-rights, so I am asking.
Air space is controlled by the federal government. A drone operating following federal regulations and laws can fly over private property. Regulations are extensive though which might limit effectiveness.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #606  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2026, 6:20 PM
DarthVader_1961 DarthVader_1961 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 463
In a recent tv interview, one guy suggested that the line follow what via already uses…

Guess he did not realize the impact if that in freight rail shared with via or that train travel would have to stop for several years
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #607  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2026, 8:31 PM
phil235's Avatar
phil235 phil235 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
What a moron. Alto is Crown Corporation without any enabling legislation that give it any powers to do anything. Neither Alto nor its parent company (Via) are Agents of the Crown.

https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-...ons/agent-status-crown-corporations.html
The High Speed Rail Act, which is part of the Budget implementation bill will give it a series of powers in relation to first right of refusal on land and a streamlined expropriation process. It is ultimately the Minister who would do the expropriation on request from Alto under the Act, but as long as basic criteria are met, Alto has the power to designate land and have it expropriated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #608  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2026, 10:58 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
What a moron. Alto is Crown Corporation without any enabling legislation that give it any powers to do anything. Neither Alto nor its parent company (Via) are Agents of the Crown.

https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-...ons/agent-status-crown-corporations.html
Seems like an easy fix, if necessary.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #609  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2026, 2:33 AM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by phil235 View Post
The High Speed Rail Act, which is part of the Budget implementation bill will give it a series of powers in relation to first right of refusal on land and a streamlined expropriation process. It is ultimately the Minister who would do the expropriation on request from Alto under the Act, but as long as basic criteria are met, Alto has the power to designate land and have it expropriated.
The only power it gives the corporation is registering a right of first refusal with the municipality (so they can match purchase offers) and the right to ask the minister to start an expropriation process. It doesn’t give Alto or anyone else the right to do geological testing or build access roads on private/municipal/indigenous/provincial property or represent the state (the thing the CEO claimed).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #610  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2026, 2:34 AM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer View Post
Seems like an easy fix, if necessary.
I guess, but in four years they haven’t done it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #611  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2026, 10:14 AM
YOWetal YOWetal is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
I guess, but in four years they haven’t done it.
In fairness they were mostly just pretending for the first 3-3 1/2 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #612  
Old Posted Jun 3, 2026, 11:56 AM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by YOWetal View Post
In fairness they were mostly just pretending for the first 3-3 1/2 years.
It sort of seems like they are still pretending.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #613  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2026, 2:42 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Some parts in that area are landslide-prone so I prefer that Alto actually manage to get in and take some bore hole data.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ha-kJTVDwqI
It turns out that people in Prescott Russell refuse entries for various reasons:
(1) “My house foundation is already clayey. If Alto comes digging, my house will go down to the river.”
(2) There isn’t enough information from Alto.
(3) The geological conditions of clayey soil in this area are already known. Why are we repeating the study at our cost?
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #614  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2026, 2:44 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ha-kJTVDwqI
It turns out that people in Prescott Russell refuse entries for various reasons:
(1) “My house foundation is already clayey. If Alto comes digging, my house will go down to the river.”
(2) There isn’t enough information from Alto.
(3) The geological conditions of clayey soil in this area are already known. Why are we repeating the study at our cost?
(1) There's no digging involved in this phase.
(2) This phase is necessary to provide answers.
(3) Soil conditions can vary dramatically from one spot to the next.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #615  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2026, 3:05 PM
skyscraperaccount skyscraperaccount is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 286
Quebec would withdraw from high-speed rail project if PQ forms next government

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/high-speed-train-pq-toronto-quebec-city-9.7228219?cmp=rss

In a news release Tuesday, Plamondon said he's concerned the project could cost far more than that, pointing to a Bloc Québécois estimate of $200 billion for the project.

If that ends up being accurate, Quebec's share of the project could be $40 billion, Plamondon said. CBC News reached out to the Parti Québécois to learn how it determined that sum. CBC also reached out to the Bloc Québécois for further explanation on how the party arrived at its estimate.

Plamondon said in the release that the rail line would have little impact on our road traffic and carries a high risk of being a "massive financial fiasco."

A Parti Québécois government would "demand that these funds be transferred to the province unconditionally so that they can be invested in priority infrastructure for Quebecers: roads, hospitals, schools and urban public transit."

The statement also denounced the federal government's approach to the planned route, saying that consultations have been "opaque" and residents and farmers are worried about being expropriated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #616  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2026, 3:09 PM
harls's Avatar
harls harls is offline
Mooderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Aylmer, Québec
Posts: 21,354
I'm sure all those funds would go to fast tracking the twinning of the 50, plus fixing healthcare in the Outaouais...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #617  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2026, 3:47 PM
ponyboycurtis's Avatar
ponyboycurtis ponyboycurtis is offline
Cigritbutt enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Blahttawa
Posts: 1,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by harls View Post
I'm sure all those funds would go to fast tracking the twinning of the 50, plus fixing healthcare in the Outaouais...
A spiteful man.. such as myself, would do Ottawa/Toronto on a moments notice if that were the case. Start the EAs now boys. Might as well bring it all the way to Windsor while we are at it.

You want to act like some non nation building Albertan dickheads then have fun on the outside looking in.

For added spite the eastern terminus will be Cornwall.
__________________
I don't understand how communism works.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #618  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2026, 4:13 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,001
I see the eastern Ontario chapter of No Trains, Trains Bad is having a protest on Parliament Hill tomorrow.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #619  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2026, 5:33 PM
skyscraperaccount skyscraperaccount is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponyboycurtis View Post
A spiteful man.. such as myself, would do Ottawa/Toronto on a moments notice if that were the case. Start the EAs now boys. Might as well bring it all the way to Windsor while we are at it.

You want to act like some non nation building Albertan dickheads then have fun on the outside looking in.

For added spite the eastern terminus will be Cornwall.
Yep, can't deal with unstable governments. Have your plans in place, make it clear that Quebec is responsible for any increased costs in a future Montreal/Ottawa link and start the Ottawa to Toronto ASAP. When a Canadian nation building govt gets in place in Quebec, it can be ready to go day after elections.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #620  
Old Posted Jun 22, 2026, 1:55 PM
urbanforest urbanforest is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 314
Quote:
CityNews: Government considering high-speed rail stop in Kingston, Ont.


Transportation Minister Steven MacKinnon says he has directed Alto to consider a high-speed rail stop in Kingston, Ont.

The minister’s staff issued a statement on his behalf ahead of a formal announcement in Kingston later this morning.
https://ottawa.citynews.ca/2026/06/22/government-considering-high-speed-rail-stop-in-kingston-ont/


I’m from the Kingston area and have family there, but this still doesn’t sit right with me. This kind of politicking will deliver a slow-high-speed train and wreck budgets and timelines.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:31 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.