HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3421  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2026, 2:49 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTownandDown View Post
Are the lakes a deficiency that is going to be corrected by the Contractor/negotiated with the Contractor/whoopsie-daisy by the City, and thus work is stopped?
They still haven't fixed any of the drainage issues on Queen Street.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3422  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2026, 3:18 PM
Tesladom Tesladom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 579
An east-bound on-ramp would also be good from Bronson, but that's just daydreaming
There are like 4 EB off ramps from after Parkdale before the next onramp
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3423  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2026, 4:31 PM
phil235's Avatar
phil235 phil235 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tesladom View Post
An east-bound on-ramp would also be good from Bronson, but that's just daydreaming
There are like 4 EB off ramps from after Parkdale before the next onramp
There used to be one there - up until the 70s maybe? I think that the issue is space. With the massive two-lane off-ramp for Kent, there would be no room for an on-ramp at Bronson. I think you would basically need to recreate the basket-weave you see at the WB on-ramp at Lyon, which doesn't meet MTO standards, and you would be weaving across two lanes of exiting traffic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3424  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2026, 4:36 PM
phil235's Avatar
phil235 phil235 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by TransitZilla View Post
I think the issue is lack of space under the 417 bridge for a southbound left-turn lane.
Yes, you're right, that is the issue. They didn't widen the road under the bridge when the did the rapid bridge replacement, for obvious reasons. I think they could still fit a small left turn lane along the lines of the current one, but the City felt that would be insufficient and went with the second road.

They described the primary concern as traffic backing up through the Catherine intersection. Personally I don't see why they couldn't manage without a turn lane and just put in an advanced green to help move traffic. There are left turns permitted from the left lane all the way down Bronson, and probably 3/4 of the current left turning volume at Chamberlain will be eliminated as cars from the highway will be able to go straight through. I don't think that the impact of allowing turns there would be that significant, particularly with some priority.

I suspect a big part of the reason was keeping the off-ramp type turn from Bronson NB onto Chamberlain without the nuisance of a traffic light. Makes for more excitement for pedestrians trying to cross.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3425  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2026, 4:53 PM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 2,581
Except, I believe that I heard from someone that, during the planning for the 417 Bronson overpass replacement, the MTO asked the City if they wanted to lengthen the overpass so that an extra lane could be added to Bronson. This is purely rumour, but I believe it to be true. Since the City would have had to foot a huge bill for the change, it declined the option and the MTO did a Rapid Bridge Replacement with a like structure, at its own cost.

What I would like to see happen now:

Pipe-Jack Tunneling should be used to create pedestrian/cycling passes under the 417 on each side of the Bronson overpass. Then the sidewalks along the section of Bronson under the overpass can be removed, and that space allocated to the missing south-bound left-turn lane.

Get rid of Chamberlain west of Percy. Connect Imperial out to a signalized intersection with Plymouth and Bronson. People who want to go east on Chamberlain will turn at the new ramp intersection.

FIX THE 417 OFF-RAMP to Catherine, and the Catherine/Raymond intersection with Bronson. There should be a separate lane to the 417 on-ramp, west of Bronson. Also, the MTO should not ‘hog’ the two left-turn lanes onto south-bound Bronson. It should guide drivers, preferentially, to the inside lane – but still allowing overflow to mingle with people from Catherine who are trying to turn left.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3426  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2026, 7:01 PM
phil235's Avatar
phil235 phil235 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,556
Agreed - that would be much better than the current situation. By moving all of Chamberlain north, you eliminate one of the worst crossings for pedestrians on Bronson and you create some extra developable land and the opportunity to expand the park. All without worsening traffic on Bronson.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3427  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2026, 9:09 PM
ponyboycurtis's Avatar
ponyboycurtis ponyboycurtis is offline
Cigritbutt enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Blahttawa
Posts: 1,621
Quote:
Originally Posted by phil235 View Post
There used to be one there - up until the 70s maybe? I think that the issue is space. With the massive two-lane off-ramp for Kent, there would be no room for an on-ramp at Bronson. I think you would basically need to recreate the basket-weave you see at the WB on-ramp at Lyon, which doesn't meet MTO standards, and you would be weaving across two lanes of exiting traffic.
I feel like the Queensway from Nicholas to Carling doesn't meet MTO standards.

Anyhow. Random thought.

Can I fire one off on these companies that do perpendicular road cutting and back fills for like a replaced sewer outlet on a house or whatever type of utility work and without a doubt just do a single aggregate fill and pack prior to asphalt? You must understand that these companies are licensed, bonded insured through the wazoo and in the realm of city works outside of sewer lists are handpicked from a relatively short list and yet my bump stops are the first to hear about them.

See.. we don't need to redesign roads like the people who choke on their own drool on r/Ottawa who talk about putting chicanes on Baseline road so drivers don't have to take personal responsibility.

We got that built in. It's not a bug. It's a feature.

I used to live on Miss Ottawa st. Yes. Like the beauty pageant. For whatever reason the old roadworks.. not backfilled as I just described heaved up and down horribly. I had a 1 1/2" drop on my sedan and even at 40 kph this thing was dangerously close to bottoming out at all times.

If you know the area, Miss Ottawa and eventually Jasmine would be a semi common cut through to avoid Montreal road and Ogilvie junction.

I took a sick pleasure in watching dickheads bomb down my road at 60 plus only to watch the sparks fly once the waterbed like jelly roll got going.
__________________
I don't understand how communism works.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3428  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2026, 10:42 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTownandDown View Post
I was at the intersection of Richmond and Golden yesterday, right at the foot of Byron Linear Park (Where the farmers market is on the weekends).

Aside from partially complete reconstruction of the intersection that's been sitting, unfinished, and no work occurring for the last two months (a mess of unfinished gravel/bike lanes/upturned signage/ unfinished curb mess...

It was raining quite heavily, and ALL of the pedestrian crosswalks were lakes. The roads were un-puddled, however there was 4-5" of water on EVERY crosswalk of that intersection. Like, perfectly aligned rectangles of water at each crosswalk. A brand new intersection.

WTF.

Are the lakes a deficiency that is going to be corrected by the Contractor/negotiated with the Contractor/whoopsie-daisy by the City, and thus work is stopped?
Drainage on Richmond between Golden and Cleary has always been a problem. Not sure why but certainly hope that the reconstruction addresses the issue.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3429  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2026, 1:15 PM
Catenary Catenary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Eade View Post
What I would like to see happen now:

Pipe-Jack Tunneling should be used to create pedestrian/cycling passes under the 417 on each side of the Bronson overpass. Then the sidewalks along the section of Bronson under the overpass can be removed, and that space allocated to the missing south-bound left-turn lane.
This isn't possible due to the design of the replacement bridge.

The bridges have footings that hook inwards at the bottom, under the sidewalk. This is why the sidewalks under the bridges are much higher than the roadway - they are above the concrete footings.

Regardless, putting pedestrians in a box culvert is a CPTED nightmare, especially near Centretown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3430  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2026, 2:45 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catenary View Post
Regardless, putting pedestrians in a box culvert is a CPTED nightmare, especially near Centretown.
Notionally, or data-backed?
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3431  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2026, 8:13 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,505
Highway 417 work could wrap up by late June, city says
Lane closures have caused headaches for commuters west of downtown

CBC News
Posted: Jun 13, 2026 2:59 PM EDT | Last Updated: 1 hour ago


Drivers frustrated by Highway 417 lane closures that have caused big bottlenecks west of downtown could now see relief by late June, the city says.

In a memo to city councillors Saturday, rail construction program director Richard Holder said the lanes near between the Woodroffe Avenue and Pinecrest Road exits could reopen as early as June 22, more than five weeks ahead of the original schedule.

The closures, caused by work on the western expansion of Ottawa's light rail network, have been wreaking havoc on commutes since they began in May.

They were initially expected to last until late July. The reopening had previously been pushed up to July 6.

To meet the new June 22 date, crews will need to work through the night in the area next weekend, Holder wrote. Drivers should expect:
  • Westbound lane and ramp closures from 9 p.m. on June 20 until 8 a.m. on June 21.
  • Eastbound lane and ramp closures from 9 p.m. on June 21 until 5 a.m. on June 22.

That work depends on the weather co-operating, Holder added.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/highway-417-construction-work-finish-date-june-9.7234618
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3432  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2026, 2:59 AM
skyscraperaccount skyscraperaccount is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Posts: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
Highway 417 work could wrap up by late June, city says
Lane closures have caused headaches for commuters west of downtown

CBC News
Posted: Jun 13, 2026 2:59 PM EDT | Last Updated: 1 hour ago


Drivers frustrated by Highway 417 lane closures that have caused big bottlenecks west of downtown could now see relief by late June, the city says.

In a memo to city councillors Saturday, rail construction program director Richard Holder said the lanes near between the Woodroffe Avenue and Pinecrest Road exits could reopen as early as June 22, more than five weeks ahead of the original schedule.

The closures, caused by work on the western expansion of Ottawa's light rail network, have been wreaking havoc on commutes since they began in May.

They were initially expected to last until late July. The reopening had previously been pushed up to July 6.

To meet the new June 22 date, crews will need to work through the night in the area next weekend, Holder wrote. Drivers should expect:
  • Westbound lane and ramp closures from 9 p.m. on June 20 until 8 a.m. on June 21.
  • Eastbound lane and ramp closures from 9 p.m. on June 21 until 5 a.m. on June 22.

That work depends on the weather co-operating, Holder added.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/highway-417-construction-work-finish-date-june-9.7234618
Must be an election year...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3433  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2026, 12:19 PM
golfguy9 golfguy9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2025
Posts: 54
They finally repaved the entire left lane on the WB Queensway so it no longer feels like one side of your car is on rainbow road.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3434  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2026, 2:13 PM
Catenary Catenary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
Notionally, or data-backed?
CPTED is not exactly a strict science, but the difference between walking along a sidewalk that is open to the road and an enclosed box culvert is not particularly subjective. One is going to make people a lot less comfortable than the other.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3435  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2026, 7:29 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Catenary View Post
CPTED is not exactly a strict science, but the difference between walking along a sidewalk that is open to the road and an enclosed box culvert is not particularly subjective. One is going to make people a lot less comfortable than the other.
But from a three-D spacial point of view, a box culvert is generally going to be a transport solution only where a surface sidewalk isn't an option.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3436  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2026, 7:26 PM
Catenary Catenary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
But from a three-D spacial point of view, a box culvert is generally going to be a transport solution only where a surface sidewalk isn't an option.
Perhaps you didn't catch it, but the option proposed was not a surface sidewalk. The comment I was replying to was regarding pipe jack tunnelling a separate sidewalk under the highway so the sidewalks could be eliminated in the underpass and the road widened to 6 lanes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:07 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.