Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou
It's an interesting idea I guess. It's ironic that Sean Orr will be arguing in court that saying someone is providing free drugs to addicts is a defamatory statement! i.e. his court case depends on him arguing a reasonable person hearing about someone handing out drugs would damage that person's reputation. Would he argue that it's reasonable to look down on Jean Swanson because she's on record doing it?
|
The argument wouldn't be that "someone provided free drugs!" is a defamatory statement. It's that Sim alleged that an elected official, who a reasonable person would expect to possess a stronger moral and ethical compass than the average voter, was engaging in illegal activity while in office, without evidence to support the allegation. Drug trafficking is still illegal, despite any decriminalization that's occurred over the past several years. Drug use is still stigmatized and shamed, especially among the community to which Sim was targeting that message, and he absolutely knew that when he chose to make the allegation against Orr.
It's up to Orr to decide whether he feels he needs to defend his character through legal means. I don't have a problem with it.
Politically? Giving the story a second wind might be the smarter move, keeping a spotlight on the mayor's poor conduct as more voters start "tuning in" to municipal politics.