HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


    1444 Alberni East Tower in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Vancouver Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #261  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2025, 11:48 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,480
At least Asia Standard is publicly traded so we might get some news on the status of the project along the way

https://asiastandard.com/reports/#
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #262  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2025, 8:45 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,940
Seems like there's some movement on this project as Landa have resubmitted a rezoning application.

They claim they want to keep the same look and design, but are changing the CAC contributions and Social Housing is now in the mix.

That should be interesting.

Almost as interesting as the notion that it still being proposed as a primarily strata tower.

https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/1444-146...t-vancouver-towers-revised-rezoning-cacs


Quote:
"There is new movement on a long-stalled project to redevelop 1444 Alberni St. (1468 Alberni St.) and 740 Nicola St. in downtown Vancouver’s West End neighbourhood into a pair of mixed-use residential towers.

However, in a highly apparent attempt to improve the project’s financial and economic viability, the planned redevelopment has taken a step backward as Landa Global Properties and Asia Standard Americas have submitted a newly revised rezoning application to change the housing tenure makeup and community amenity contributions (CACs) package."


Another apparent change is that Arcadis are now on board as the (sole) Architectural consultant (not Designer or architect or record).

The original proposal was done by Stern out of New York with MCMP as the local architect of record.

If there was a project I Wanted to come back to life, this one would be close to top of the list.
Especially if it retains as much of this look as possible.

As much as people were complaining in another thread (justifiably so) that there doesn't seem to be any more originality or creativity in tower design in Vancouver anymore,.....this could go a long way in helping with that, and it doesn't hurt that it's already very....'Alberni'....in terms of how it fits in.


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #263  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2025, 9:28 PM
madog222 madog222 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,024
Rezoning was submitted back in May and discussed on the previous page. Now it’s up on shapeyourcity.

https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/1444-alberni-st-and-740-nicola-st

“The revised rezoning will not change the design or exterior of the building.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #264  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2025, 9:57 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,471
Is that the longstanding vacant lot they're using in the renders as some kind of bucolic field?

The Irony.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #265  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2025, 11:08 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,387
I still love them and hope this to finally move forward.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #266  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2025, 11:29 PM
gaviscon gaviscon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 764
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Is that the longstanding vacant lot they're using in the renders as some kind of bucolic field?

The Irony.
It's a lot? I thought it was a crappy park with a bench lol

Surprised a prime site like that still sits empty with no active proposal
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #267  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2025, 10:07 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,471
Quote:
Originally Posted by gaviscon View Post
It's a lot? I thought it was a crappy park with a bench lol

Surprised a prime site like that still sits empty with no active proposal
In their flurry of housing legislation I'm surprised the BC NDP hasn't introduced legislation to discourage this kind of thing where an offshore owner just sits on an unproductive property. Maybe a super-high tax rate?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #268  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2025, 1:32 AM
urbanight93 urbanight93 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 237
someone commented somewhere that the trend for developers to pivot away from CAC $ to providing social housing is related to making it easier to reach financing thresholds / unlock low cost financing from CMHC.

I'm not sure how true this is nor am familiar with CMHC provisions, but would this make sense? I can't imagine this would improve the demand side (buyers wouldn't care to have a building that has social housing). Also, i think the Curv did the opposite maneuver (social housing to CAC) before ultimately going into receivership.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #269  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2025, 12:21 PM
mcminsen's Avatar
mcminsen mcminsen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 9,957
Robert A.M. Stern, Architect Who Reinvented Prewar Splendor, Dies at 86
He designed museums, schools and libraries before winning international acclaim late in life for 15 Central Park West
in Manhattan, hailed as a rebirth of the luxury apartment building.


"Robert A.M. Stern, a New York architect who built museums, schools, houses and libraries with little notice outside his
profession before winning international acclaim late in life by designing what was then the most expensive condominium
building overlooking Central Park in Manhattan, died today at his home in Manhattan. He was 86."



Robert A.M. Stern in 2007. Glowing reviews drove a stampede of celebrities to 15 CPW — the building he described as “my breakthrough”
— overshadowing the competition from sleek glass towers that had been the rage in Manhattan early in the new millennium.
Credit...Richard Perry/The New York Times
source: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/27/arts/design/robert-am-stern-dead.html



Mr. Stern’s 15 Central Park West building in 2010. Its two limestone-clad structures are linked
by a glass-enclosed, copper-domed rotunda-lobby and a circular porte-cochere driveway.
Credit...Marilynn K. Yee/The New York Times
source: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/27/arts/design/robert-am-stern-dead.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #270  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2025, 4:24 PM
Zepfancouver's Avatar
Zepfancouver Zepfancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,644
Thanks mcminsen for sharing. I read that story online yesterday, the passing of renowned architects always get my attention.
For the lack of knowledge on this project and not reading back on this thread, I would have never made the connection.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #271  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2026, 6:07 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,480
Quote:
1468 Alberni Street – Redevelopment Progress
We continue to refine the redevelopment scheme
to maximise efficiency and value. Key optimisations
include an increased net saleable area and a reduced
average unit size to better align with current market
demand. In parallel, we have applied to the City
of Vancouver seeking to fulfil the entirety of the
Community Amenities Contribution (CAC) through
the provision of City-owned non-market rental
housing in lieu of a cash payment. The application is
under active review and publicly posted on the City’s
“Shape Your City” portal.
https://asiastandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/e00129_IR.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #272  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2026, 5:37 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,471
Why yes, everyone I know looking for a condo has said "please decrease the unit size". Not.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #273  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2026, 5:43 PM
Glow Fun City's Avatar
Glow Fun City Glow Fun City is offline
deadhead raver Jew
 
Join Date: Jul 2025
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Why yes, everyone I know looking for a condo has said "please decrease the unit size". Not.

that's why I live in a 1961 building
__________________
Don’t tell me this town ain’t got no heart
You just gotta poke around…
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #274  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2026, 5:55 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Why yes, everyone I know looking for a condo has said "please decrease the unit size". Not.
Only data table I see is showing 4-bedroom units so it might have to do with 20 of those getting smaller or changed type
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #275  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2026, 8:23 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
Only data table I see is showing 4-bedroom units so it might have to do with 20 of those getting smaller or changed type
Seems like they changed the rental room size count?

2018 -there's a proposed and a recommended (other than proposed) column. the information below is from the 2nd one.

Rental
Studio 30
1 bedroom 53
2 bedroom 29
3 bedroom 17

Strata
1 bedroom 116
2 bedroom 162
3 bedroom 16
4 bedroom 20

https://council.vancouver.ca/20180724/documents/p7.pdf

Revised

Market Rental
Studio 40
1 bedroom 11
2 bedroom 22
3 bedroom 5

Strata
1 bedroom 116
2 bedroom 162
3 bedroom 16
4 bedroom 20

https://rezoning.vancouver.ca/applicatio...nd-740-nicola-st/application-booklet.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #276  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2026, 9:05 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,772
Huh I expected the rental change but surprised no strata revision
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #277  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2026, 10:06 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
Huh I expected the rental change but surprised no strata revision
It says COV requirement is for 25% of strata to be 2 bedroom and 10% to be 3+ bedrooms.

I assume there's not a huge difference between 3 or 4 bedroom layouts. And some penthouse units.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #278  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2026, 10:16 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Seems like they changed the rental room size count?

2018 -there's a proposed and a recommended (other than proposed) column. the information below is from the 2nd one.

Rental
Studio 30
1 bedroom 53
2 bedroom 29
3 bedroom 17

Strata
1 bedroom 116
2 bedroom 162
3 bedroom 16
4 bedroom 20

https://council.vancouver.ca/20180724/documents/p7.pdf

Revised

Market Rental
Studio 40
1 bedroom 11
2 bedroom 22
3 bedroom 5

Strata
1 bedroom 116
2 bedroom 162
3 bedroom 16
4 bedroom 20

https://rezoning.vancouver.ca/applicatio...nd-740-nicola-st/application-booklet.pdf
The strata stays the same. The total rental was 129 market, and is now proposed as 78 market and 51 social, so still 129 altogether.

Market Rental studio 40 + social studio 9 = 49 studio
Market Rental 1-bedroom 11 + social 1-bedroom 16 = 27 1-bedroom
Market Rental 2-bedroom 22 + social 2-bedroom 15 = 37 2-bedroom
Market Rental 3 bedroom 5 + social 3-bedroom 11 = 16 3-bedroom

So overall, 19 more studios, 26 fewer 1-bed, 8 more 2-bed and 1 less 3-bed.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #279  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2026, 12:36 AM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,471
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
The strata stays the same. The total rental was 129 market, and is now proposed as 78 market and 51 social, so still 129 altogether.

Market Rental studio 40 + social studio 9 = 49 studio
Market Rental 1-bedroom 11 + social 1-bedroom 16 = 27 1-bedroom
Market Rental 2-bedroom 22 + social 2-bedroom 15 = 37 2-bedroom
Market Rental 3 bedroom 5 + social 3-bedroom 11 = 16 3-bedroom

So overall, 19 more studios, 26 fewer 1-bed, 8 more 2-bed and 1 less 3-bed.
That's the total unit count for two towers? If so, sad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #280  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2026, 12:42 AM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
That's the total unit count for two towers? If so, sad.
No, that's the total rental unit count. There are also 314 strata units. The 51 social housing units will be in an air-rights parcel, and given to the City of Vancouver (just like the social housing in Landmark, Jervis and Mirabel, elsewhere in the West End).
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:24 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.