HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2661  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2026, 12:29 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dwils01 View Post
Is the speed limit for the new bridge going to be the same as the old one or is it just because it's still a construction zone?

Also, there's still the same chokepoints on the bridge approaches. McBride is still only one lane to the bridge, 2 lanes merging down to 1.King George and Scott Road both lose one lane. Essentially 4 lanes merging down to 2.

At least the trucks won't take up both lanes as before. The bridge should flow fine but I still see there being the usual traffic back ups on the bridge approaches in the morning and afternoon commutes.
the only improvement is the bridge itself, nothing will change for commuters, the approaches have gotten much worse on the Surrey side from my experience, I was using it to commute from Surrey but the recent changes made me switch back to the Port Mann, I might use it on weekends, but what used to be at worst 10-15 minutes of being backed up turned into 40-45 minute backups with the changes.
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2662  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2026, 3:23 AM
Lexus's Avatar
Lexus Lexus is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 2,666
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
the only improvement is the bridge itself, nothing will change for commuters, the approaches have gotten much worse on the Surrey side from my experience, I was using it to commute from Surrey but the recent changes made me switch back to the Port Mann, I might use it on weekends, but what used to be at worst 10-15 minutes of being backed up turned into 40-45 minute backups with the changes.
Semi trucks now can stay in one lane, and overall increase in width of lanes plus the shoulder will naturally make drivers go faster.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2663  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2026, 6:49 AM
Vantage's Avatar
Vantage Vantage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 478
The speed limit should be 60 km/h imo. Also I know it's been beaten to death, but this really should've opened with three lanes each direction, or at the very least three southbound. Absolutely mind boggling. And don't you dare mention that on reddit or you will be downvoted by the hordes that don't understand what an add/drop lane is and parrot the induced demand boogeyman at you.
__________________
Vancouver born and raised | My Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2664  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2026, 5:25 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexus View Post
Semi trucks now can stay in one lane, and overall increase in width of lanes plus the shoulder will naturally make drivers go faster.
Yeah this is easily the biggest difference and will speed things up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2665  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2026, 7:49 PM
Dave2 Dave2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vantage View Post
The speed limit should be 60 km/h imo..

Indeed, looks like traffic is flowing along at 64 km/h (40 M.P.H).



We should have learned this lesson in the 70s, reducing speed limits to below the speed of traffic just leads to people ignoring them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2666  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2026, 12:41 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave2 View Post
Indeed, looks like traffic is flowing along at 64 km/h (40 M.P.H).



We should have learned this lesson in the 70s, reducing speed limits to below the speed of traffic just leads to people ignoring them.
I drove this twice this afternoon. Everyone was going between 70-80
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2667  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2026, 3:27 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 885
What's

What's up with the speed bumps on the deck.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2668  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2026, 4:10 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,984
It's an expansion joint. From the videos posted there's definitely a significant bump to them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2669  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2026, 5:09 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,371
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
It's an expansion joint. From the videos posted there's definitely a significant bump to them.
It's weird during the December opening the expansion joint bump doesn't seem as large.

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2670  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2026, 7:23 AM
Vantage's Avatar
Vantage Vantage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
It's an expansion joint. From the videos posted there's definitely a significant bump to them.
There's a significant bump because they haven't paved the final layer of asphalt yet, leaving a large bump at every expansion joint. Also visible at the pedestrian crossing of the on-ramp from Royal, temporary letdowns from the sidewalk as the asphalt does not come up to the level of the letdown from the concrete curb yet.

I imagine they will fully repave the bridge and approaches and get it to it's final thickness once the connection to SFPR is complete. So probably a while yet. You can also see the road is not in its final alignment where the south approach meets the abutment embankment.

Still lots of work left to be done on the bridge.
__________________
Vancouver born and raised | My Flickr

Last edited by Vantage; Feb 16, 2026 at 7:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2671  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2026, 7:53 AM
Tvisforme's Avatar
Tvisforme Tvisforme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 2,137
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Yeah this is easily the biggest difference and will speed things up.
Yes, the Lions Gate Bridge saw an improvement in traffic flow after the 2000 deck replacement project, even though the number of lanes did not change.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2672  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2026, 3:57 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,371
FWIW the southbound lanes also seems unfinished since it has one of those noticeable ridges when they are repaving the highway. Did they ever repave the Port Mann the first year or two after opening?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2673  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2026, 4:01 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 7,946
The old bridge was full of cyclists and pedestrians yesterday. It closes on Tuesday, but will be open again today.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2674  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2026, 1:17 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,886
I drove over it on Saturday, the road was quite rough, maybe more paving to come? the old bridge had a lot of people walking and cycling on it.

The new bridge, at least on the northbound side had no pedestrian lane, as half is not ready yet, I don't know if the Southbound side is ready for them but stoill a lot of work on the bridge itself to be called completed.
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2675  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2026, 1:22 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexus View Post
Semi trucks now can stay in one lane, and overall increase in width of lanes plus the shoulder will naturally make drivers go faster.
that wasn't my issue, KGB used to be three lanes as you came down that hill to where that intersection is with the gas stations and McDonalds. Now the far right lane you are forced to turn right towards the east. So now everyone starts to bunch up near 112th into two lanes instead of three and then at that intersection by the McDonalds and Chevron you have a ton of traffic joining from west and east and than people cheat and try to get out of the right lane andd push their way in. And than you hit where all the Scott Road Traffic joins in and you have three lanes trying to squeese into two lanes to get to the bridge. The North side is better now that vehicles can get to Columbia directly from the bridge and less bunching up where they used to all turn for Columbia and Royal Ave.
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2676  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2026, 2:06 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,371
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
I drove over it on Saturday, the road was quite rough, maybe more paving to come? the old bridge had a lot of people walking and cycling on it.

The new bridge, at least on the northbound side had no pedestrian lane, as half is not ready yet, I don't know if the Southbound side is ready for them but stoill a lot of work on the bridge itself to be called completed.
They said the east side opens late spring and the other side mid-2026.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2677  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2026, 6:04 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave2 View Post

We should have learned this lesson in the 70s, reducing speed limits to below the speed of traffic just leads to people ignoring them.
Oh we have learned it. They did a city-wide study a few years ago and re-labeled some streets.

Basically, the posted speed limit is immaterial. People will travel the speed at which the road is designed. THAT is the true speed limit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2678  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2026, 6:16 PM
Stainer Stainer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 54
I'd bet the speed limit is temporarily lower due to not having the final surface complete. Hitting those expansion joints at full speed would be bad for both them and your vehicle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2679  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2026, 5:18 PM
idunno idunno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 922
^^^smartest point yet on this topic!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2680  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2026, 6:21 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stainer View Post
I'd bet the speed limit is temporarily lower due to not having the final surface complete. Hitting those expansion joints at full speed would be bad for both them and your vehicle.
But isn't the design and construction of the bridge specifically rated as a posted speed of 50 km/h with a design speed of 60 km/h? (Page 40)

https://www.infrastructurebc.com/wp-cont...-and-Construction-Execution-REDACTED.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:34 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.