HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2025, 9:40 PM
Ottawacurious Ottawacurious is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 556
Confederation Heights Master Plan—Public Engagement
Canada Lands Corporation and the City of Ottawa will be jointly hosting a workshop to present the draft master plan for the redevelopment of Confederation Heights. Participants at this workshop will review the draft master plan and learn more about the city’s Secondary Plan process and how their input will help inform a final master plan, anticipated to be presented to City Council in 2026 in coordination with the city-initiated Secondary Plan process.

Location: Hellenic Event Centre, 1315 Prince of Wales Dr. Ottawa, ON K2C-1N2.
Date: Tuesday June 24
Sessions:

Afternoon: 12:00 pm to 3:00 pm
Evening: 6:00 pm to 9:00 pm

https://engage.ottawa.ca/confederation-heights-secondary-plan

Last edited by Ottawacurious; Jun 13, 2025 at 9:44 PM. Reason: Added link to registration
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2026, 7:50 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,594
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2026, 7:53 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,594
Overview Slides. Current vs full buildout:




Sectors/ownership:





Density/land use:



RA Centre:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2026, 7:54 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,594
Transportation:







Park space:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2026, 7:55 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,594
Concept renderings:




Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Jan 24, 2026, 12:19 AM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 2,593
I just have to wonder what is going through the heads of the people who come up with things like this. This is a bizarre fantasy, with little to tie it to any form of reality.

The list of things that I like:
  1. I think that the Trillium Line station is moved to span under Heron Road – although the likelihood of that happening is slim-to-none. The maps appear to show what I interpret as a transit station on both the north and south side of Heron, where the Trillium Line passes under. But, maybe this is just my view through a lens of hope.

The list of things I don’t like is rather long:
  1. I think that the biggest thing is the new road network. The “Ramps Rationalization” isn’t. This creates sweeping streets that require a lot of turns to get anywhere. And those turns are into and through the neighbourhood. Why should all the traffic leaving south-bound Bronson be directed onto The Arch road? Well, maybe all of it. When I look at the map, it shows the ramp to east-bound Heron, but that is not shown in the render. If that ramp is staying, then why feed cars to The Arch? If you just make it simple, maybe buses could service the area – including Money’s Bay Station (can we please give that poor station a more reasonable name) – and flow through to/from Billings Bridge Station.
  2. A map can colour the current Tilley and Canada Post building’s parking lots green and draw in buildings, but cars are still going to be arriving with workers. Where are the cars going to park? Are expensive underground parkades to be added?
  3. Instead of converting the Tupper Building’s overflow parking lot (N-W corner of Heron-Riverside) into buildings, just return it to Vincent Massey Park. Similarly with the Tupper Building itself – remove it and add that area to Hog’s Back Park. Make Riverside Drive the clear delineator for the parks. I do not have a problem if some of that land is used for parking for the two parks, or other park facilities. Alas, it appears that the SWM pond placement means that the pedestrian underpasses of Heron and Riverside will not remain.
  4. The RA Centre gets, what, about a quarter of the space it currently has? That’s crazy. Sure, you might be able to stack a couple of racket courts, but that makes them expensive. Clearing land for homes by building expensive replacements for what was there makes the houses all that much more expensive. And will they have stacked baseball diamonds and soccer pitches? There is a picture of an indoor sports arena. Is that to take the place of the Civic Centre’s arena’s lost seats?

The list of problems could go on, but it is not worth more time looking at this ridiculous ‘fluff’.

PS Oh, I thought of something else that I like: Two of my favorite buildings were kept, the Canada Post building, and 1500 Bronson (CBC Building or Edward Drake Building) – although I have my doubts as to whether the later could be economically saved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2026, 3:11 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,594
I'm also seeing the station moved to under Heron with entrances on both sides, yet with single tracking. The whole line should be doubled with station entrances on both sides (or at least a controlled crosswalk) where possible. Carling for sure needs entrances on both sides + crosswalk + skywalk considering the insane volume we'll see in only a few years.

And yes, please rename Mooney's Station back to Confederation Heights, or even Heron.

Happy to see the ramps removed, but yeah, the arch is a strange, unnecessary addition. Looks like we're adding a 5 points intersection, which could be a disaster.

Parking, I don't know. They don't really specify as far as I can tell. I think large, single level underground parking lots like Lansdowne could be a good solution.

I'm not necessarily against turning that parking into buildings, but possibly having a wide green corridor that directs people to Vincent Massey would be desirable.

Not a fan of the lost space at the RA Centre. Build over the parking lots, but leave the green space and sports facilities.

As far as I can tell all buildings are preserved (with Tupper getting an arm amputated). Happy to see that to preserve a link to the past.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2026, 3:45 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,006
Setbacks, setbacks, setbacks, setbacks; setbacks from setbacks; setbacks with setbacks on top.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2026, 3:47 PM
SkeggsEggs SkeggsEggs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 403
the land use slide seems to indicate buildings, not the station being moved
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2026, 3:48 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,594
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
Setbacks, setbacks, setbacks, setbacks; setbacks from setbacks; setbacks with setbacks on top.
Setbacks along Bronson and Riverside are fine since those are, for all intent and purposes, highways. For the most part, outside those corridors, it looks like they are planning to have buildings along the edge of the sidewalks, main street style.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2026, 7:34 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,750
The outstanding feature of this plan is that the traffic sewers and railways remain. They can't be removed.. Much of the centre around the rail station is green space. When we remove the various ramps, traffic will be rerouted onto internal streets. Maybe I am wrong, but this plan eliminates the RA Centre? The renders make it look pretty but are we just putting lipstick on a pig?
.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2026, 8:10 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,594
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
The outstanding feature of this plan is that the traffic sewers and railways remain. They can't be removed.. Much of the centre around the rail station is green space. When we remove the various ramps, traffic will be rerouted onto internal streets. Maybe I am wrong, but this plan eliminates the RA Centre? The renders make it look pretty but are we just putting lipstick on a pig?
.
I'm having trouble how people will get on/off Bronson. I see a new off ramp to get onto Heron. I guess those blue internal streets (with intersections) are how people will travel on and off Bronson, which will extend the ride and potentially create traffic issues. I wish they could at least figure out a way to connect with Riverside with simplified ramps.

As for the RA Centre, I think the plan is to build a new one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2026, 8:13 PM
harls's Avatar
harls harls is offline
Mooderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Aylmer, Québec
Posts: 21,366
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
Setbacks, setbacks, setbacks, setbacks; setbacks from setbacks; setbacks with setbacks on top.
But road.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2026, 8:35 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,533
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
I'm having trouble how people will get on/off Bronson. I see a new off ramp to get onto Heron. I guess those blue internal streets (with intersections) are how people will travel on and off Bronson, which will extend the ride and potentially create traffic issues. I wish they could at least figure out a way to connect with Riverside with simplified ramps.
The new traffic movements are right there on the Ramps Rationalization slide you posted above. And almost every one of them is proposing to use the new internal streets as an alternative to the previously convenient ramps. And you still can't turn left from Heron to Riverside... look at the eastbound (green) route they propose for that!

Here it is again, but larger:


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2026, 8:43 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,594
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
The new traffic movements are right there on the Ramps Rationalization slide you posted above. And almost every one of them is proposing to use the new internal streets as an alternative to the previously convenient ramps. And you still can't turn left from Heron to Riverside... looks at the eastbound (green) route they propose for that!

Here it is again, but larger:
Thanks for posting a zoomed in version.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2026, 11:17 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Setbacks along Bronson and Riverside are fine since those are, for all intent and purposes, highways. For the most part, outside those corridors, it looks like they are planning to have buildings along the edge of the sidewalks, main street style.
They don't look very along-the-edge in those images.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2026, 12:25 AM
Coho Coho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 120
Why are they getting rid of the ramps at Brookfield? Adding a signaled intersection there just seems like it'll add congestion in all directions.. Airport Pkwy.. Brookfield.. etc
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2026, 5:13 AM
zzptichka zzptichka is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Outaouias
Posts: 2,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coho View Post
Why are they getting rid of the ramps at Brookfield? Adding a signaled intersection there just seems like it'll add congestion in all directions.. Airport Pkwy.. Brookfield.. etc
Because ramps don't pay property taxes.
__________________
My aerial Ottawa photos on Flickr 📷
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2026, 2:50 PM
TransitZilla TransitZilla is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
And you still can't turn left from Heron to Riverside... look at the eastbound (green) route they propose for that!
It would be nice to figure out a way to make such a movement possible for buses at least, to make it possible for something like route 41 to serve Mooney's Bay station on its way to Billings Bridge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2026, 3:10 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,750
Progress:

Adding signalized intersections on the airport parkway

Who wants to live there with all that traffic on internal streets?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:55 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.