Quote:
Originally Posted by mcj
I was jealous watching the REM open, but the Finch LRT makes me glad we dodged the Surrey LRT bullet. ~50 mins to travel ~10km, no thank you, most of our buses do better than that.
|
The REM opening was proof to me, yet again, that automated metro should be the standard for all major cities that want to take metro transit seriously in this day and age.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFUVancouver
The underwhelming rollout of Toronto's Finch West LRT (it's slower than the bus it replaces) further underscores how much of a bullet Metro Vancouver dodged with the Canada Line, Evergreen Line, and the Surrey Langley extension. There was vigorous debate over the years that some form of these lines should have been LRT. Evergreen was even initially green-lit to be LRT, before the Province stepped up with additional funding.
|
I have been saying this over-and-over again on these forums that at-grade LRT is a very,
very niche transit solution. And I think that a lot of people are brainwashed into thinking
at-grade LRT is a
rapid transit system when in fact it is a
capacity transit system. And not always a great one at that.
In my opinion, at-grade LRT is best at addressing capacity, comfort, and bus shortages.
Ironically, one of the most successful models is the TTC streetcar network since it doesn't pretend to be anything other than a streetcar. And a big reason is that buses on the same TTC streetcar routes will still run as fast as a TTC LRT vehicle with all of that traffic downtown; it's just that Streetcars are able to carry a lot more people at once.