HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1141  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2025, 6:50 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,436
There's lots of people who work at VGH that are on lower end of the salary scale as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1142  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2025, 7:31 PM
seamusmcduff seamusmcduff is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 614
Where did s211 get the idea that this was publicly funded?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1143  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2025, 7:39 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,756
Quote:
Originally Posted by seamusmcduff View Post
Where did s211 get the idea that this was publicly funded?
I think because it says "to provide dedicated workforce housing for Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH) and Vancouver General Hospital (VGH) staff".

Just reading it in a bit more detail, it says they'll be furnished.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1144  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2025, 8:23 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,419
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
It's being developed by a private developer. The change to the size of units is because the developer will lease the market rental units to staff of VGH and VCH, and those agencies have indicated that the demand will mostly be for studio units. Presumably they don't anticipate that a significant number of their staff that they expect to lease the units will be wanting to live there for a long time.
Huh, remember those days of yore 5-10 years ago when the actual market could provide housing staff at VGH and VCH could afford. Before speculators bought those sites up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1145  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2025, 8:36 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 7,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Huh, remember those days of yore 5-10 years ago when the actual market could provide housing staff at VGH and VCH could afford. Before speculators bought those sites up.
The actual market will be delivering housing for VGH and VCH staff in this project. This is an actual market project by an actual market developer.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1146  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2025, 9:15 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,419
Regarding another project, Michael Geller on X says the project referenced in this January article is DOA:

...Jennifer Irvine purchased her Kitsilano duplex on Vancouver’s west side eight years ago, but now that her neighbours have assembled their properties to develop an 18-storey tower, she says her leafy picturesque street is undergoing a new form of blockbusting.

Last fall, a company called Havn Development obtained a rezoning permit on behalf of three property owners with a proposal to build a 170-unit rental tower with podium at 2156-2172 W. 14th Ave., between Yew and Arbutus streets. The site currently consists of a detached house and two duplexes, but the city has plans to create a second downtown for the low- to mid-density neighbourhoods within the 500-block Broadway Plan. That includes the approval of high-rise towers in the middle of quiet side streets....


https://www.theglobeandmail.com/real-est...ia&utm_campaign=Shared+Web+Article+Links
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1147  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2025, 9:36 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 7,963
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Regarding another project, Michael Geller on X says the project referenced in this January article is DOA:

...Jennifer Irvine purchased her Kitsilano duplex on Vancouver’s west side eight years ago, but now that her neighbours have assembled their properties to develop an 18-storey tower, she says her leafy picturesque street is undergoing a new form of blockbusting.

Last fall, a company called Havn Development obtained a rezoning permit on behalf of three property owners with a proposal to build a 170-unit rental tower with podium at 2156-2172 W. 14th Ave., between Yew and Arbutus streets. The site currently consists of a detached house and two duplexes, but the city has plans to create a second downtown for the low- to mid-density neighbourhoods within the 500-block Broadway Plan. That includes the approval of high-rise towers in the middle of quiet side streets....


https://www.theglobeandmail.com/real-est...ia&utm_campaign=Shared+Web+Article+Links
Assuming Geller's information is correct, it supports the comments here that not all the projects will go ahead anytime soon. The three owners have spent quite a bit establishing the potential for a future rental tower, but raising the development funds to do it themselves, or finding a developer willing to buy them out, was always risky. Especially so now, as population growth is slowing in the region, and rents have fallen every month - "the 13th consecutive month of yearly rent declines" according to Zumper's survey.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1148  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2025, 9:53 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,756
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
Assuming Geller's information is correct, it supports the comments here that not all the projects will go ahead anytime soon. The three owners have spent quite a bit establishing the potential for a future rental tower, but raising the development funds to do it themselves, or finding a developer willing to buy them out, was always risky. Especially so now, as population growth is slowing in the region, and rents have fallen every month - "the 13th consecutive month of yearly rent declines" according to Zumper's survey.
And "dead on arrival" is a very extreme way to phrase "not yet" and we'll get our site locked in and wait. Then again it's Geller
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1149  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2025, 9:55 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,394
The next phase in the cycle would be residents complaining about living next to an empty lot (or worse, derelict houses) for 5 years wondering when development (in whatever form) will occur.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1150  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2025, 11:23 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
And "dead on arrival" is a very extreme way to phrase "not yet" and we'll get our site locked in and wait. Then again it's Geller
Havn's Carolina St project got a building permit recently but who knows if it advances or not.

https://plposweb.vancouver.ca/Public/Default.aspx?PossePresentation=Guest&PosseObjectId=273844103
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1151  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2025, 11:32 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,756
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Havn's Carolina St project got a building permit recently but who knows if it advances or not.

https://plposweb.vancouver.ca/Public/Default.aspx?PossePresentation=Guest&PosseObjectId=273844103
Well to that point as well. One project at a time. Geller is so dramatic
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1152  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2025, 12:45 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
Well to that point as well. One project at a time. Geller is so dramatic
They did remove the Manitoba project from their website which was paused due to the park shadowing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1153  
Old Posted Nov 14, 2025, 12:49 AM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,756
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
They did remove the Manitoba project from their website which was paused due to the park shadowing.
OMG ya that was such a sideshow of a Hearing
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:42 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.