HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1121  
Old Posted May 5, 2023, 10:37 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,757
Just spit ballin' here
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1122  
Old Posted May 12, 2023, 7:19 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,425
Not a good look for ABC especially coming on the heels of their rebate of empty house tax to the "deserving poor" developers, such as the Duke of Westminster.

Motion to track Broadway ‘demovictions’ rejected by Vancouver city council
By Darrian Matassa-Fung Global News
Posted May 11, 2023 8:45 am

Vancouver city council has rejected a motion to track the pace of ‘demovictions’ along the Broadway corridor.

Housing development in the Broadway neighbourhood is expected to ramp up in the future following last year’s passing of the Broadway Plan.

Click to play video: 'Vancouver asked to track demovictions because of Broadway Plan'
1:50
Vancouver asked to track demovictions because of Broadway Plan
Green Party Coun. Pete Fry said that could mean 2,000 existing households could be forced out each year for redevelopment due to developments.....


https://globalnews.ca/news/9690937/vanco...on-track-broadway-demovictions-rejected/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1123  
Old Posted May 12, 2023, 8:50 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 1,142
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Not a good look for ABC especially coming on the heels of their rebate of empty house tax to the "deserving poor" developers, such as the Duke of Westminster.

Motion to track Broadway ‘demovictions’ rejected by Vancouver city council
By Darrian Matassa-Fung Global News
Posted May 11, 2023 8:45 am

Vancouver city council has rejected a motion to track the pace of ‘demovictions’ along the Broadway corridor.

Housing development in the Broadway neighbourhood is expected to ramp up in the future following last year’s passing of the Broadway Plan.

Click to play video: 'Vancouver asked to track demovictions because of Broadway Plan'
1:50
Vancouver asked to track demovictions because of Broadway Plan
Green Party Coun. Pete Fry said that could mean 2,000 existing households could be forced out each year for redevelopment due to developments.....


https://globalnews.ca/news/9690937/vanco...on-track-broadway-demovictions-rejected/
Did anyone seriously expect a different approach? Giving tax breaks to the rich and doing as little as they can to help the poors is the conservative modus operandi.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1124  
Old Posted May 12, 2023, 8:53 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,757
Fry's motion was a bit strange tho as it was his back door way to enact pace-of-change. Having an official quarterly / annual report or no report won't change how many people have to move due to new construction.

Either way people will have to move before construction and more people will move in after.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1125  
Old Posted May 12, 2023, 11:38 PM
seamusmcduff seamusmcduff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 614
Which is why it's questionable that they would vote not to track that information. We know that demovictions are an inevitability with this plan, but it's still important information to track imo. The cost would be minimal too. Not really sure what the downside of tracking it would be, other than it would provide data to help analyze the success of the rental protections...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1126  
Old Posted May 13, 2023, 12:04 AM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 3,615
Quote:
Originally Posted by seamusmcduff View Post
We know that demovictions are an inevitability with this plan, but it's still important information to track imo. The cost would be minimal too. Not really sure what the downside of tracking it would be, other than it would provide data to help analyze the success of the rental protections...
What's the upside exactly? If renovictions are lower than projected, does that mean more development would be allowed? Unlikely. If renovictions are higher than projected, is this just ammunition for NIMBY obstructionism? Pretty likely.

Seems like a lose lose to me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1127  
Old Posted May 13, 2023, 2:05 AM
seamusmcduff seamusmcduff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 614
I would say if you're going to propose and enact policy, it's essential to track the effects of that policy, regardless of who chooses to use that data.

Often you won't even know how the data came come in handy until it's already too late
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1128  
Old Posted May 13, 2023, 5:05 AM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by seamusmcduff View Post
I would say if you're going to propose and enact policy, it's essential to track the effects of that policy, regardless of who chooses to use that data.

Often you won't even know how the data came come in handy until it's already too late
But I mean the data is known. There are x amount of people living in the Plan area and the projection is x new residents.

Fry's motion was to be fuel for delaying building new rental and adding hours to stretched Staff. It's silly and onerous. The renters are as protected as can be. And vacancy is at an all time low.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1129  
Old Posted May 13, 2023, 5:07 AM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,757
To add:

Housing department is tracking demovictions already. All folks eligible are getting what Council passed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1130  
Old Posted May 13, 2023, 5:14 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,996
General rule of thumb: when Adriane Carr is in favour of something, the YIMBY solution is usually the opposite of that thing. Credit where credit is due, ABC saw through it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1131  
Old Posted Oct 22, 2023, 8:24 PM
Feathered Friend Feathered Friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,499
Broadway public realm - South Granville Plaza West Pop-up Feedback







Quote:
The public plaza at Granville & W 13th Ave was even busier than normal yesterday as over 80 people dropped by to help shape the future public realm along the Broadway SkyTrain. This survey closes today, so don’t pass up your chance to be heard

https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/broadway-public-realm?tool=survey_tool#tool_tab
https://x.com/City_Duo/status/1716188171644633209?s=20

Last edited by Feathered Friend; Oct 22, 2023 at 10:13 PM. Reason: Forgot the link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1132  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2023, 7:44 AM
trofirhen trofirhen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,042
I keep hoping that on top of all the provisions made for pedestrians and cyclists, that Broadway reborn will also be spiffy, a bit like Wilshire Blvd in LA.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1133  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2023, 5:04 PM
idunno idunno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 924
*cough* there will be no provisions for cyclists. ABC made sure of that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1134  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2023, 7:30 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by idunno View Post
*cough* there will be no provisions for cyclists. ABC made sure of that.
That's awesome, especially along Broadway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1135  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2023, 10:12 PM
FarmerHaight's Avatar
FarmerHaight FarmerHaight is offline
Peddling to progress
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Vancouver's West End
Posts: 1,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by idunno View Post
*cough* there will be no provisions for cyclists. ABC made sure of that.
Now, now, ABC promised bike lanes could be considered in the future. Just not now because that would require a redesign of the subway vents and other streetscape elements, and it will obviously be much cheaper in the future to add bike lanes when all the concrete is poured as compared to now when many of the plans are simply lines on paper.
__________________
“Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of riding a bike” – John F Kennedy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1136  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2023, 10:17 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 9,996
Keeping in mind that reducing Broadway to two lanes would likely have screwed up the FTN and limited future bus frequency.

Some streets exclude transit, others exclude cars, some even exclude pedestrians; bikers and rollers can still access Broadway, they "just" need to head up/down one block and then dismount and walk. Personally, I'd focus on geting 8th and 10th to triple-A rather than picking a fight over a done deal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1137  
Old Posted Oct 25, 2023, 3:19 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,397
At Burrard & West 12th Ave.:

Greystar Acquires Broadway Plan Site in $41M Deal



https://vancouvermarket.ca/2023/10/24/greystar-acquires-broadway-plan-site-in-41m-deal/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1138  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2025, 5:28 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,757
816-860 W 13th Ave and 2915-2925 Willow St rezoning re-application

"The City of Vancouver has received an application to amend the approved CD-1 (Comprehensive Development District) draft by-law. The proposal is to provide dedicated workforce housing for Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH) and Vancouver General Hospital (VGH) staff within two 21-storey buildings and includes:

Increasing the total rental units from 354 to 507 and modifying the unit mix to support dedicated workforce housing for VCH and VGH staff

Modifying the affordability requirements for the below-market rental units from 20% of the residential floor area at 20% below city-wide average market rents to 100% of units at discounted rents aligned with the Westside Area Development Cost Levy (DCL) rates."

the application now proposes 77% of the apartments to be studios which average 404sf

Last edited by GenWhy?; Nov 12, 2025 at 6:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1139  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2025, 3:46 AM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,467
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
816-860 W 13th Ave and 2915-2925 Willow St rezoning re-application

"The City of Vancouver has received an application to amend the approved CD-1 (Comprehensive Development District) draft by-law. The proposal is to provide dedicated workforce housing for Vancouver Coastal Health (VCH) and Vancouver General Hospital (VGH) staff within two 21-storey buildings and includes:

Increasing the total rental units from 354 to 507 and modifying the unit mix to support dedicated workforce housing for VCH and VGH staff

Modifying the affordability requirements for the below-market rental units from 20% of the residential floor area at 20% below city-wide average market rents to 100% of units at discounted rents aligned with the Westside Area Development Cost Levy (DCL) rates."

the application now proposes 77% of the apartments to be studios which average 404sf
Honest to gawd, bureaucrats take my tax money and build below-market housing for unionized public servants??????? If that isn't textbook theft disguised as conflict-of-interest, then what is!
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1140  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2025, 2:43 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 7,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Honest to gawd, bureaucrats take my tax money and build below-market housing for unionized public servants??????? If that isn't textbook theft disguised as conflict-of-interest, then what is!
It's being developed by a private developer. The change to the size of units is because the developer will lease the market rental units to staff of VGH and VCH, and those agencies have indicated that the demand will mostly be for studio units. Presumably they don't anticipate that a significant number of their staff that they expect to lease the units will be wanting to live there for a long time.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:16 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.