Quote:
Originally Posted by SpawnOfVulcan
There's a reason I stopped coming around this thread. The quarrel between the two of them is exhausting. At least we haven't heard any racially tinged comments by atlanta in a while...
|
The only "racially tinged" comments I have made are that I think UA admin is afraid to raise admission standards in part due to the media outrage that would take place if it did and Black freshman enrollment declined. I don't see how that is hateful or controversial at all given the data. I don't want a decline in Black freshman enrollment, but I value selectivity over "diversity," and know that UA could find other ways to preserve AA enrollment without having to keep standards so low.
I want to also talk about my concerns for UA after the embarrassing loss to FSU. I love Bama football as much as anyone, but clearly, UA's football reputation is suffering and may not recover any time soon. In fact, UA simply does not have the $$$$$ to compete with most big name programs in the NIL wars. Yet UA's marketing focuses heavily on its football rep, especially with that phrase, "Where Legends Are Made!."
Will UA continue to attract the large numbers of applications for admission if it both keeps admission standards low, AND consistently fails to replicate its past football success? I hope those of you who love UA as much as I do will think about this, and consider asking UA admin to raise admission standards. We simply can NOT count on continued football success to attract large freshman classes. I think DeBoer COULD turn it around, but the consensus seems to be that it is not likely. Do we really want to be stuck with mediocre reputations in both academics AND football? If Clemson can have both high academic standards AND still a love for football, why can't we? One thing is clear, Clemson has not been dependent on football success to stay higher in the academic rankings.