Quote:
Originally Posted by mcj
This seems false. Perhaps in nominal dollar terms, but in every other metric I would imagine it is not.
|
"Municipal" might be doing a lot of the work in qualifying that statement. I still doubt the claim, but, if it's only against strictly municipal projects, it might be possible. You know, ruling out road projects with any provincial, regional/metro/translink, or federal planning/funding/work, the bar gets a lot lower.
Like, compared to any other road project carried out solely by the City of Surrey with no outside involvement, I can't think of anything else. 96 Avenue's big do around the Golden Ears construction probably wouldn't count, building King George way way back wouldn't count.
I'd buy that it's Surrey's biggest. BC's biggest... even BC's biggest municipal*, that's a real lofty claim.
You're probably right with that "nominal dollar terms" bit.