HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 12:53 AM
SL123 SL123 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,864
Wasnt sure where to post this, but I took a few pics in Sandy Hill over the weekend. There's quite a few nice looking, quality "Missing Middle"/Infill project under construction in that neighbourhood. It good to see.







Last edited by SL123; Jun 26, 2024 at 1:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2024, 3:03 AM
rdaner rdaner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 297
Good to see!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2025, 4:11 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,195
City fees are squeezing small developers out of rental housing
François Latreille, a small ByWard Market developer, says city charges are making low-rise developments impossible to build. And he has the expenses list to show it.

By Bruce Deachman, Ottawa Citizen
Published Jul 11, 2025 | Last updated 55 minutes ago | 12 minute read




François Latreille is doing exactly what this city desperately wants and needs: He’s building attractive infill homes on a very human scale, adding mid-density housing in a way that doesn’t overshadow its neighbourhood or clash with existing heritage.

Or, rather, that’s what he WOULD be doing, if only City Hall would make it a bit easier.

As things stand, though, he says the development charges and other fees the city is demanding from builders make projects like his impossible. His project, he concedes, may well be dead.

“Most rental apartments in Ottawa come from low-rise buildings of four storeys or less,” he says. “But city development costs are halting new projects in this category. Under the city’s current policies, only high-rise buildings are viable. Developments under 20 units are not financially viable.

“In essence, these fees are killing rental housing development for most small developers.”

That’s a shame. Alongside the hats he wears as an engineer and management consultant, Latreille’s role as a small developer in the ByWard Market perfectly suits his passion for livable, walkable neighbourhoods. It might seem trite to say that he builds the kind of housing he would want in his own neighbourhood, but that’s exactly what he’s done: Two of the trio of infill condominium projects he designed and built under his Domaines du Marché brand 15 to 20 years ago are on St. Andrew Street, where he lives. The third, at 11 units the largest of the three, is on Guigues Street, a block away. Two of the projects won City of Ottawa heritage awards.

Coincidentally, I recently chanced upon a neighbour of Latreille’s whom I know: Lowertown Community Association president Sylvie Bigras. “Are you writing about his latest project?” she asked. “What François brings to this neighbourhood is exactly what it needs.”

And yet.

Latreille’s latest plan is to purchase a pair of rundown duplexes on St. Andrew Street, near Sussex Drive, and turn them into a four-storey, 16-unit building comprised of two- and three-bedroom apartments.

One of the houses would be demolished, although the proposed new structure would maintain its ghostly resemblance. The front third of the other duplex, a 140-year-old red brick house, would be saved and incorporated into the project.

Features of the project, which has an estimated hard-costs budget of $5.25 million, read like a checklist of things we should hope for in all new developments: Wheelchair access. A rooftop garden. Underground parking. An elevator. One hundred per cent electric. Rainwater harvesting. High-efficiency heat pumps. Energy-efficient design. Two of the units would be affordable. Construction would employ First Nations and Inuit workers hired through the Aboriginal Futures Program to provide on-the-job training.

But Latreille will first need to fork out a lot of cash — somewhere in the neighbourhood of $700,000 — before the city will green-light the project and issue him a building permit, itself a $28,000 portion of that $700K.

It’s simply too much, he says. The project became unworkable when city costs crossed the $330,000 threshold.


<more>

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...sing-city-fees
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2025, 6:22 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,418
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
[B]City fees are squeezing small developers out of rental housing

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...sing-city-fees
This is a great article. The detailed look at the fees really shows how crazy it has gotten.

So a 4 story building needs to spend $5k on a noise study but the city does street cleaning regularly in the market at 4am below hundreds of apartments. Something they would never do on a suburban street with 5 residents.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2025, 7:16 PM
ponyboycurtis's Avatar
ponyboycurtis ponyboycurtis is offline
Cigritbutt enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Blahttawa
Posts: 1,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by YOWetal View Post
This is a great article. The detailed look at the fees really shows how crazy it has gotten.

So a 4 story building needs to spend $5k on a noise study but the city does street cleaning regularly in the market at 4am below hundreds of apartments. Something they would never do on a suburban street with 5 residents.
Yeah those line items keep coming. I can't speak to what the city actually needs to facilitate itself and this addition of residents but I know a colleague of mine who split a single floor corner lot house into a semi detach and he was constantly surprised by the costs.

In a nutshell you could remodel a modest 3 piece bathroom for what it cost to cut and widen the curb.

Those are some nice infills BTW. Aside from the second from bottom I like them all.
__________________
I don't understand how communism works.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2025, 2:38 AM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,976
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
[B]City fees are squeezing small developers out of rental housing

<more>

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local...sing-city-fees
Excellent article of the process. Most City staff are so removed from the actual costs and to them it has no context and with so many of them working from home at times accountability is not good and getting an inperson meeting with decision makers in the Planning Department is next to impossible. The scope creep that occurs in these files is unbelievable and so many times new requirements come into the process near the end and most people just want/need approval. There is very little 'out of the box' thinking in the City Planning Department. Checklist planning. Planning by PDF.

No acknowledgement by the City that maybe too many people are reviewing the plans (many of whom don't have the qualifications matching those preparing the plans/reports) and that is the reason that the City has such high fees that align with cost recovery mandates.

Last edited by Proof Sheet; Jul 12, 2025 at 12:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:03 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.