HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #321  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2025, 2:31 PM
zzptichka zzptichka is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Outaouias
Posts: 2,354
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
I am trying to remember when a political dispute between the "transit" and "cycling" camps during mainstreet-rebuild projects was ever resolved in favour of transit in this city.
Because they exist in your imagination. It's always a dispute between "my free parking" camp and everyone else.
__________________
My aerial Ottawa photos on Flickr 📷
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #322  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2025, 4:29 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzptichka View Post
Because they exist in your imagination. It's always a dispute between "my free parking" camp and everyone else.
I wish they did only exist in my imagination. If they were imaginary, then the bus service on Beechwood and Montreal would have been better than what we ended up with after the "complete street" treatment.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #323  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2025, 5:58 PM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 2,586
I’ve been looking at the TMP a little more.

According to the Phase 5 Changes, the section of median Transitway, along Heron and Walkley between Billings Bridge and Russell, has been moved up the priority line. Basically, this Transitway will replace the # 41 bus.

Does anyone here take the # 41 bus? Is the 15-minute service currently provided inadequate? Does it routinely get bogged down in heavy traffic?

There is a note in the changes stating that this Transitway would replace the planned Heron Road Continuous Bus Lanes project between Bank and Conroy. I didn’t find any information about that project in the current TMP documents. (I assume that they have already had the changes incorporated.) But the CBC ran a story on April 10, 2025, showing a map that included bus lanes along Conroy and Heron, from Leitrim to Bank. The bus lanes along Conroy have been shortened to extend south only to Rosebella and then a short section at Leitrim. That is, the lanes will not continue across the Greenbelt..

It sounds as if the entire Bayshore to St. Laurent Baseline/Heron/Walkley median Transitway is planned to be completed in the near- to medium-term (beginning with the segment between Billings Bridge and Algonquin Stations).

However, I must wonder if Billings Bridge will eventually be removed, and the line simply kept along Heron. There is, as far as I know, no plan for a Transitway on Data Centre, between Heron and Billings Bridge, nor from Billings Bridge to Heron, along Bank. The map (which I understand is ‘representational’) shows the Transitway remaining on Heron. Also, the text states that the Transitway:
Quote:
Provides high quality east-west connectivity; improves transit access to employment, commercial and institutional uses adjacent to the corridor; and supports connectivity to Bayshore Station, Algonquin Station, Mooney’s Bay Station, Heron Station, and St-Laurent Station. Also improves transit speed and reliability for several routes with very high existing ridership.
There is no mention of Billings Bridge in the final (needs-based) configuration.

Granted, removing the detour up to Billings Bridge would make the line faster, but at what cost? Billings Bridge is a destination and has been built up as a major transit transfer point.

On another note, all Transit Priority corridors (including Bank from Hunt Club to Wellington) have also been moved into the Priority category. I’m not sure what will be included in Transit Priority implemented, but with only $8M earmarked for all, they will be quite limited. (Remember, the one intersection at Baseline and Greenbank is costing $19M.) It will be interesting to see what happens to the traffic on Bank once Transit Priority measures are implemented.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #324  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2025, 6:13 PM
TransitZilla TransitZilla is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Eade View Post
However, I must wonder if Billings Bridge will eventually be removed, and the line simply kept along Heron. There is, as far as I know, no plan for a Transitway on Data Centre, between Heron and Billings Bridge, nor from Billings Bridge to Heron, along Bank. The map (which I understand is ‘representational’) shows the Transitway remaining on Heron.
I doubt the small detour to Billings Bridge will be removed, because it is such a useful shopping destination for people along that route, as well as as being a transfer hub.

The original NWTB draft showed route 41 remaining on Heron until Data Centre Rd and accessing Billings Bridge that way. It was only later changed to travel via Clementine.

If/When the Transitway is built, I wouldn’t be surprised to see route 41 shift to the Data Centre routing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #325  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2025, 10:46 AM
kmcamp kmcamp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Eade View Post
I’ve been looking at the TMP a little more.

According to the Phase 5 Changes, the section of median Transitway, along Heron and Walkley between Billings Bridge and Russell, has been moved up the priority line. Basically, this Transitway will replace the # 41 bus.

Does anyone here take the # 41 bus? Is the 15-minute service currently provided inadequate? Does it routinely get bogged down in heavy traffic?

There is a note in the changes stating that this Transitway would replace the planned Heron Road Continuous Bus Lanes project between Bank and Conroy. I didn’t find any information about that project in the current TMP documents. (I assume that they have already had the changes incorporated.) But the CBC ran a story on April 10, 2025, showing a map that included bus lanes along Conroy and Heron, from Leitrim to Bank. The bus lanes along Conroy have been shortened to extend south only to Rosebella and then a short section at Leitrim. That is, the lanes will not continue across the Greenbelt..

It sounds as if the entire Bayshore to St. Laurent Baseline/Heron/Walkley median Transitway is planned to be completed in the near- to medium-term (beginning with the segment between Billings Bridge and Algonquin Stations).

However, I must wonder if Billings Bridge will eventually be removed, and the line simply kept along Heron. There is, as far as I know, no plan for a Transitway on Data Centre, between Heron and Billings Bridge, nor from Billings Bridge to Heron, along Bank. The map (which I understand is ‘representational’) shows the Transitway remaining on Heron. Also, the text states that the Transitway:

There is no mention of Billings Bridge in the final (needs-based) configuration.

Granted, removing the detour up to Billings Bridge would make the line faster, but at what cost? Billings Bridge is a destination and has been built up as a major transit transfer point.

On another note, all Transit Priority corridors (including Bank from Hunt Club to Wellington) have also been moved into the Priority category. I’m not sure what will be included in Transit Priority implemented, but with only $8M earmarked for all, they will be quite limited. (Remember, the one intersection at Baseline and Greenbank is costing $19M.) It will be interesting to see what happens to the traffic on Bank once Transit Priority measures are implemented.
Specifically the 41 not exactly, but from those neighborhoods to Billings there's a lot of transit demand. I used to live in that general area, and I like many would take the 44 via Walkey to the transitway and up to Billings. It was faster and more frequent at the time then going via Heron even though the distance is longer, especially in rush hour
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #326  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2025, 2:32 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,570
This thing might actually happen after 50 years of all talk and no action.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #327  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2025, 3:05 PM
stolenottawa stolenottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 131
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Eade View Post
I’ve been looking at the TMP a little more.

According to the Phase 5 Changes, the section of median Transitway, along Heron and Walkley between Billings Bridge and Russell, has been moved up the priority line. Basically, this Transitway will replace the # 41 bus.

Does anyone here take the # 41 bus? Is the 15-minute service currently provided inadequate? Does it routinely get bogged down in heavy traffic?

There is a note in the changes stating that this Transitway would replace the planned Heron Road Continuous Bus Lanes project between Bank and Conroy. I didn’t find any information about that project in the current TMP documents. (I assume that they have already had the changes incorporated.) But the CBC ran a story on April 10, 2025, showing a map that included bus lanes along Conroy and Heron, from Leitrim to Bank. The bus lanes along Conroy have been shortened to extend south only to Rosebella and then a short section at Leitrim. That is, the lanes will not continue across the Greenbelt..

It sounds as if the entire Bayshore to St. Laurent Baseline/Heron/Walkley median Transitway is planned to be completed in the near- to medium-term (beginning with the segment between Billings Bridge and Algonquin Stations).

However, I must wonder if Billings Bridge will eventually be removed, and the line simply kept along Heron. There is, as far as I know, no plan for a Transitway on Data Centre, between Heron and Billings Bridge, nor from Billings Bridge to Heron, along Bank. The map (which I understand is ‘representational’) shows the Transitway remaining on Heron. Also, the text states that the Transitway:

There is no mention of Billings Bridge in the final (needs-based) configuration.

Granted, removing the detour up to Billings Bridge would make the line faster, but at what cost? Billings Bridge is a destination and has been built up as a major transit transfer point.

On another note, all Transit Priority corridors (including Bank from Hunt Club to Wellington) have also been moved into the Priority category. I’m not sure what will be included in Transit Priority implemented, but with only $8M earmarked for all, they will be quite limited. (Remember, the one intersection at Baseline and Greenbank is costing $19M.) It will be interesting to see what happens to the traffic on Bank once Transit Priority measures are implemented.
What's this going to look like? I'm having trouble picturing it. Dedicated bus lanes?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #328  
Old Posted Jun 20, 2025, 5:15 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
This thing might actually happen after 50 years of all talk and no action.
Perhaps in another 25 years
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #329  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2025, 1:05 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,525
Councillor pushes Ottawa ring road instead of 6th bridge
City committee endorses motion urging higher levels of government to look at idea

Arthur White-Crummey · CBC News
Posted: Jun 26, 2025 4:50 PM EDT | Last Updated: 1 hour ago


A city councillor says Ottawa needs a southern ring road to relieve congestion on the Queensway — instead of a controversial bridge over Kettle Island.

Beacon Hill-Cyrville Coun. Tim Tierney floated the idea at Thursday's public works and infrastructure committee meeting as councillors debated updates to the transportation master plan, a guiding document setting out infrastructure priorities for the coming decades.

Tierney noted that Highway 417 is currently the only major east-west route for interprovincial and regional traffic, including trucks, which should be rerouted south of the urban core.

He made a motion, which passed by a vote of 9-2, urging all levels of government to pursue a "full and fair evaluation" of a southern ring road. The motion will now go to council for a final vote.

Tierney said it sends a clear message.

"We're saying this is really important to us," he said. "If the province is looking for some guidance for where they would like to provide some money to the city ... we've just indicated, it's this — it's not an interprovincial bridge."

<more>

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/co...ing-road-instead-of-6th-bridge-1.7571935
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #330  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2025, 5:33 AM
Aylmer's Avatar
Aylmer Aylmer is offline
Still optimistic
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montreal (C-D-N) / Ottawa (Aylmer)
Posts: 5,407
__________________
I've always struggled with reality. And I'm pleased to say that I won.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #331  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2025, 1:31 PM
OTSkyline OTSkyline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,816
It's not a terrible idea... With population growth, 417 traffic continues to become worse and worse with little alternatives for drivers as the other limited cross town routes (Baseline, Hunt Club) are already so congested and have so many traffic lights.

I feel like the bridges were our chokepoints pre-pandemic but I personally feel bridge congestion has eased up quite a bit since WFH and travel patterns have shifted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #332  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2025, 1:45 PM
NOWINYOW NOWINYOW is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 479
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTSkyline View Post
It's not a terrible idea... With population growth, 417 traffic continues to become worse and worse with little alternatives for drivers as the other limited cross town routes (Baseline, Hunt Club) are already so congested and have so many traffic lights.

I feel like the bridges were our chokepoints pre-pandemic but I personally feel bridge congestion has eased up quite a bit since WFH and travel patterns have shifted.
As someone who walks the stretch of Rideau St from Nicholas to King Edward almost daily, I can assure you the truck and vehicle traffic has not decreased one bit.

Aside from trucks, cars filtering from all directions into the same area to cross the Interprovincial bridge is unbelievable. I watch it stop and crawl every afternoon from my balcony.

A new bridge is needed. It was needed 20 years ago. World class cities (with many politicians claiming or dreaming Ottawa is in this club) do not have multiple logging, fuel, freight trucks running through their downtown cores.

This councillor is deflecting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #333  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2025, 1:49 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,623
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOWINYOW View Post
As someone who walks the stretch of Rideau St from Nicholas to King Edward, I can assure you the truck traffic, and vehicle traffic has not decreased one bit.

Aside from trucks, cars filtering from all directions into the same area to cross the Interprovincial bridge is unbelievable. I watch it stop and crawl every afternoon from my balcony.

A new bridge is needed. It was needed 20 years ago. This councillor is trying to deflect because a new bridge has an affect on a small portion of his political base.
Weird how in every other thread it's understood building more stroads doesn't reduce congestion but this bridge is somehow different.

Congestion is good if it gets trucks to avoid this route. I see more and more from Montreal on the 50 for example which as it's twinned more and more will become the main Montreal to Gatineau route. Add this bridge and that becomes less true.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #334  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2025, 3:08 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
This thing might actually happen after 50 years of all talk and no action.
Which particular thing?
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #335  
Old Posted Jun 27, 2025, 4:04 PM
zzptichka zzptichka is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Outaouias
Posts: 2,354
We are seriously discussing this? It's just a classic political deflection to keep stalling the bridge.
__________________
My aerial Ottawa photos on Flickr 📷
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #336  
Old Posted Jun 28, 2025, 4:13 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,749
How does a ring road address the same problem as a bridge? I am a prepared to discuss it if the ring road is placed right next to Beacon Hill.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #337  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2025, 2:03 AM
Mikeed Mikeed is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 377
Do both?
__________________
Long time reader.
Seldom post.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #338  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2025, 3:29 PM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 2,586
Why not. The Feds pay for the bridge and the Prov pays for a Ring-road.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #339  
Old Posted Jun 29, 2025, 3:48 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
How does a ring road address the same problem as a bridge? I am a prepared to discuss it if the ring road is placed right next to Beacon Hill.
My question exactly. Tim seems to be selling this as some sort of alternative, but a ring road, unless you cross it to Gatineau and plug it into the A50, doesn't solve the truck traffic in Lowertown.

And Fortier going to bat for Manor Park. She knows she represents Lowertown as well right? Lowertown with far more population and density.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #340  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2025, 2:21 PM
Richard Eade Richard Eade is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Nepean
Posts: 2,586
Well, here you go; the Ring Road that Tim is (not, I expect) pushing for:

Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Transportation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:27 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.