HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


View Poll Results: Who has the more positive vision for Canada's future?
Mark Carney's Liberals 176 73.95%
Pierre Poilievre's Conservatives 62 26.05%
Voters: 238. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3401  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 7:32 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 28,811
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackDog204 View Post
Our foreign policy should not be dictated by America, like it has since the aftermath of WW2.
Hard to do from a position of weakness. Canadians having massively underinvested in all the tools of foreign policy and lacking much economic independence aren't in a position to take foreign policy risks. Regardless of what one feels on the Israel-Palestine conflict.
     
     
  #3402  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 7:38 PM
Dartguard Dartguard is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,262
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackDog204 View Post
I hope Carney breaks ranks with the United States, on Canada's position on Israel. What Hamas did on October 7, 2023 was horrific, and Israel had every right to launch a military operation against Hamas, and weed them out of Gaza.

However, the IDF has levelled over 90% of the buildings in Gaza, which includes all Hospitals, Universities, Mosques, Day Cares, Retirement Homes, etc. Now 2,000,000 people, most of them women and children with no affiliation to Hamas, are starving to death, as the Israelis block attempts from organizations to deliver food to the people.

And now with the backing of the United States, Israel is deliberately targeting civilians in air strikes. Let's call it what it is. A genocide. I was a staunch supporter of Israel for over 40 years. However, I now am siding with the people of Gaza.

Israel should know better, considering what happened to the Jews in the Holocaust. Two wrongs do not make a right. I would urge Carney to immediately recognise the State of Palestine. It's the least Canada can do. Our foreign policy should not be dictated by America, like it has since the aftermath of WW2.
So would all that Gaza infrastructure still be there if Hamas had given back all the hostages?
     
     
  #3403  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 7:44 PM
Ozabald Ozabald is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport View Post
yes, there is this and only this.

it was absurd that anyone would think otherwise, under the circumstances. The death of the longest-reigning monarch in Canadian/British history...is going to explode demand for hotel rooms in London.

Should he have stayed on a cot in the Canadian High Commission in London?

I also think the brouhaha about Bev Oda's orange juice was similarly ridiculous.
Well, Biden stayed at the US ambassador's residence in London.
     
     
  #3404  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 7:47 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozabald View Post
Well, Biden stayed at the US ambassador's residence in London.
Yeah because they have a literal $Billion mansion in the Centre of the city. We sold off such properties when we had them under Harper and rightly so.
     
     
  #3405  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 8:05 PM
BlackDog204's Avatar
BlackDog204 BlackDog204 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: west
Posts: 3,207
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dartguard View Post
So would all that Gaza infrastructure still be there if Hamas had given back all the hostages?
"So would the Holocaust have occurred, if Hershel Grynszpan had not assassinated a diplomat in the German embassy in Paris?"


Of course, both scenarios are absurd and ridiculous. There are 59 hostages remaining. Hamas originally took 251 hostages on October 7. In other words, Hamas has released over 3/4 of the hostages.

What does Israel do in return? Destroy 90% of buildings, so that 2,000,000 people are now homeless, and living in tents. Israel has continuously prevented food from being delivered into Gaza. They also habitually are ignoring cease fire agreements, and are now in the final stage of their mission- annihilating every Palestinian in Gaza.

This is the last I will comment on it. Killing woman and children is wrong, especially when said people are defenceless and starving. Additionally, this is only going to breed more anger and hatred in the Arab World towards Israel.
     
     
  #3406  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 8:36 PM
Nite's Avatar
Nite Nite is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,368
Here is the audio of Alberta premier Danielle Smith saying that she attempted to influence the US administration to hold off on tariffs to give Pierre Poilievre the best chance at winning the upcoming election... Because he'll align Canada with Trump the most

https://streamable.com/ciqzw2
     
     
  #3407  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 8:41 PM
Ozabald Ozabald is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackDog204 View Post
"So would the Holocaust have occurred, if Hershel Grynszpan had not assassinated a diplomat in the German embassy in Paris?"


Of course, both scenarios are absurd and ridiculous. There are 59 hostages remaining. Hamas originally took 251 hostages on October 7. In other words, Hamas has released over 3/4 of the hostages.

What does Israel do in return? Destroy 90% of buildings, so that 2,000,000 people are now homeless, and living in tents. Israel has continuously prevented food from being delivered into Gaza. They also habitually are ignoring cease fire agreements, and are now in the final stage of their mission- annihilating every Palestinian in Gaza.

This is the last I will comment on it. Killing woman and children is wrong, especially when said people are defenceless and starving. Additionally, this is only going to breed more anger and hatred in the Arab World towards Israel.
What's stopping food and other essentials being delivered into Gaza through the crossing with Egypt? Why does Egypt have a border wall with Gaza?
     
     
  #3408  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 8:52 PM
BlackDog204's Avatar
BlackDog204 BlackDog204 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: west
Posts: 3,207
"Which of the following paths would you prefer regarding defence spending?"

Increase to 2% of GDP: 69%
Maintain current 1.4%: 13%
Increase spending to 5%: 9%
Spend less than the current 1.4%: 4%

Nanos Research / March 5, 2025 / n=1001 / MOE 3.1% / Telephone/Online

-----

I wish Nanos had asked how many people would approve of spending 3% on Defence.
     
     
  #3409  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 8:58 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackDog204 View Post
"Which of the following paths would you prefer regarding defence spending?"

Increase to 2% of GDP: 69%
Maintain current 1.4%: 13%
Increase spending to 5%: 9%
Spend less than the current 1.4%: 4%

Nanos Research / March 5, 2025 / n=1001 / MOE 3.1% / Telephone/Online

-----

I wish Nanos had asked how many people would approve of spending 3% on Defence.
Yeah or want to cut the GST to 3% or 1% or cut Income taxes by 25% or 50%. The only question is if we want to pay for it.
     
     
  #3410  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 9:06 PM
Loco101's Avatar
Loco101 Loco101 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Timmins, Northern Ontario
Posts: 8,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshsparrow View Post
They've both been advertising.

When the PM says he is going to Rideau Hall for 12:00 - you show some class, respect and not call an event for 11:30.

It is all about Pierre - entitlement - which you can't see even when it smacks you right in the face.
PP definitely lacks class and always has. He can hold an event at a strange time like that if he wants to but it's not always a wise move. I wonder he or any of his supporters will complain above the coverage even though he called it at that time.
     
     
  #3411  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 9:10 PM
Nite's Avatar
Nite Nite is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackDog204 View Post
"Which of the following paths would you prefer regarding defence spending?"

Increase to 2% of GDP: 69%
Maintain current 1.4%: 13%
Increase spending to 5%: 9%
Spend less than the current 1.4%: 4%

Nanos Research / March 5, 2025 / n=1001 / MOE 3.1% / Telephone/Online

-----

I wish Nanos had asked how many people would approve of spending 3% on Defence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by YOWetal View Post
Yeah or want to cut the GST to 3% or 1% or cut Income taxes by 25% or 50%. The only question is if we want to pay for it.


I would ask the public how much more would you raise the GST to increase military spending to see how people really feel about more military spending.
I doubt the majority would raise the GST 1% higher (5 to 6%).
     
     
  #3412  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 9:12 PM
Loco101's Avatar
Loco101 Loco101 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Timmins, Northern Ontario
Posts: 8,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nite View Post
Here is the audio of Alberta premier Danielle Smith saying that she attempted to influence the US administration to hold off on tariffs to give Pierre Poilievre the best chance at winning the upcoming election... Because he'll align Canada with Trump the most

https://streamable.com/ciqzw2
Wow. I wonder how this will be used during the campaign. She really made PP sound like a Trump-friendly choice.
     
     
  #3413  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 9:24 PM
missing_middle missing_middle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2025
Posts: 213
Problem with asking the public what percentage of GDP should be spent on military is that assumes that they know what the GDP figure is, what that rough calculation would come out to and then even how that number would relate to the federal budget expenses.
     
     
  #3414  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 9:24 PM
Hackslack Hackslack is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,881
It’s the Liberals election to lose no question. If they do lose it will be because the massive influx in support from the NDP and BQ have gone back to support those respective parties.

Cons are still sitting at roughly 36%-37% of the popular vote in the polls which is still very strong, and I don’t suspect they will lose much more support, at least in the polls. Cons won popular vote in 2021 with only 34%.

Cons need NDP and BQ to reign their support back in to win.
__________________
I stand with Ukraine
     
     
  #3415  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 9:28 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
It was more a lost Trudeau decade than a lost Liberal decade. Different leadership would have produced a different result, especially the last four years when JT let himself be hostage to Jagmeet.
I suspect that the NDP needs to be wiped out in this election in order for changes to happen.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
     
     
  #3416  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 9:37 PM
Architype's Avatar
Architype Architype is offline
♒︎ verified human
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 🍁 Canada
Posts: 14,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
I suspect that the NDP needs to be wiped out in this election in order for changes to happen.
That may be just an unusual phase we are going through now. Reducing the importance of alternative parties will make us more like the US in terms of lack of real political choice. To my ear, all the parties are sounding very similar in this election campaign with it's focus on Trump. It's a bit like David and Goliath, just deciding what kind of stones to sling.
     
     
  #3417  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 9:42 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Architype View Post
That may be just an unusual phase we are going through now. Reducing the importance of alternative parties will make us more like the US in terms of lack of real political choice. To my ear, all the parties are sounding very similar in this election campaign with its focus on Trump. It's a bit like David and Goliath, just deciding what kind of stones to sling.
Admittedly that’s a concern at the back of my mind.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
     
     
  #3418  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 9:46 PM
Marshsparrow Marshsparrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackslack View Post
It’s the Liberals election to lose no question. If they do lose it will be because the massive influx in support from the NDP and BQ have gone back to support those respective parties.

Cons are still sitting at roughly 36%-37% of the popular vote in the polls which is still very strong, and I don’t suspect they will lose much more support, at least in the polls. Cons won popular vote in 2021 with only 34%.

Cons need NDP and BQ to reign their support back in to win.
Actually its the Cons election to lose.

After 10 years of Liberal rule - advantage CPC
Change election - advantage CPC
2024 Fundraising (2x Liberals) - advantage CPC
Political experience - advantage CPC
Provincial gov't affiliation / support - should be advantage CPC

The difference is Trump and that the CPC is stuck with the most annoying leader of all time.
     
     
  #3419  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 9:49 PM
samne's Avatar
samne samne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastend
Posts: 4,176
I get the feeling this is a controlled demolition by Jagmeet. Why else the capitulation to Trudeau for so long then meeting with Carney in Iqaluit days before election.

Jagmeet will be gone with a bunch of nice board appointments waiting for him. He’ll be just fine…
     
     
  #3420  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2025, 9:51 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 14,915
I’d say the provincial governments have been helping the Liberals. Ford turning his back on pierrre and helping to organize that first minister meeting. Smith selling pierre to Trump and throwing him a hand grenade of demands are bad for him.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:10 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.