Quote:
Originally Posted by New Brisavoine
It absolutely does. Everyone in Europe views JFK as an "Anglo-Saxon" (and he was, in his manners, his politics, his pretense of a postcard-perfect family while being secretly a womanizer, which is typical of the prudish Anglo-Saxon world, especially America nowadays now that Britain has become much more liberal on these issues, etc).
Ditto, Ireland's nasty tax haven legislation is seen as the typical excesses of Anglo-Saxon capitalism here.
It's purely cultural. No one would see an English-speaking Ghanaian as an "Anglo-Saxon". As I believe Acajack once said in this thread, it's basically all the Caucasian Anglophone jurisdictions that are labeled as "Anglo-Saxon", and the term is now widely accepted in Europe and Latin America, and increasingly also in the British media (less so in North America).
|
The widespread definition of Anglo-saxon just is any white person who speaks english as a first language ( American, British, Australian, Canadian etc. ).
Maybe it's not accurate, but it's just how it is in everyone's subconscious.
Lumping in the Irish with the english is like lumping in the portuguese with the spanish, people who are neighbors and very similar to each other, but still two distinct peoples.
Just like the term ''latino'', its used correctly and incorrectly all the time.
Calling an Anglo-Canadian ''anglo-saxon'' is just like calling a black person african, there's a 95% chance you're correct, Haiti and other such places existing. Just harmlessly used as an umbrella term.