Quote:
Originally Posted by YOWetal
A family doctor isn't necessary for access in Canada. You can go to the ER for anything urgent or even not urgent though you will wait. If you have a heart palpitation or a rash you can get referred to a Cardiologist or a dermatologist at a walk in clinic. You can also get a prescription for a bunch of common minor ailments like urinary tract infections at a pharmacist.
|
Going to the ER for anything non emergent is not a serious suggestion and is a sign of a broken system. Most people don't have the time to work a job, take care of their family, and also wait 12+ hours to be seen for a nagging but non urgent issue that's been bothering them. There aren't enough hours in the day and that isn't access.
I've already addressed the walk in clinic issue - most walk in doctors do not get invested in a patient's care, and are only there for the churn. The work they do is the bare minimum and it barely qualifies as medicine. Yet this is really the only option for most people without a family doctor. But going to a walk in clinic or getting a prescription from a pharmacists counts as "primary care" - the study made no mention of family doctors. And yet even still Canada does worse than the USA.
Quote:
|
It's not perfect but the idea young people have better access to healthcare in the US is laughable.
|
You laugh, but how do you square that with numbers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue
It doesn’t help when supposedly walk-in clinics also require booking appointments (which defeats the whole purpose of walk-in).
|
Right, or they expect you to show up and line outside before opening because otherwise you end up waiting 2-3 hours and risk not getting seen if they hit their cap. And if you get seen, you'll likely leave unsatisfied (has anyone ever had a walk-in encounter where they felt their concern was taken seriously?). Yes, technically you can get seen but the system makes it as hard as possible. Which is why access is so bad.