HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9701  
Old Posted Jan 17, 2025, 11:24 PM
Nickelplate's Avatar
Nickelplate Nickelplate is offline
De Lurk Squad
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 298
In a poll for best Austin traffic ideas, removing vehicular traffic from Congress Ave ranked first in customer satisfaction.
You know what ranked last in customer satisfaction? Adding vehicular traffic on 6th St. What a terrible idea. Reminds me of that tragedy...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VkSMSbFV_q0

Last edited by Nickelplate; Jan 17, 2025 at 11:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9702  
Old Posted Jan 22, 2025, 5:22 PM
Sigaven Sigaven is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,584
I think pedestrianizing 6th street is a better than pedestrianizing Congress. Especially with the upgrades they're proposing to the buildings and venues.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9703  
Old Posted Jan 23, 2025, 6:47 PM
WesternSon WesternSon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 339
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigaven View Post
I think pedestrianizing 6th street is a better than pedestrianizing Congress. Especially with the upgrades they're proposing to the buildings and venues.
Well, that is your .02, but the people are who actually making the investments to the buildings want the two traffic restored.

https://www.austinmonitor.com/stories/20...xth-street-open-to-traffic-at-all-times/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9704  
Old Posted Jan 31, 2025, 5:50 PM
myBrain myBrain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 710
Quote:
Originally Posted by WesternSon View Post
Well, that is your .02, but the people are who actually making the investments to the buildings want the two traffic restored.

https://www.austinmonitor.com/stories/20...xth-street-open-to-traffic-at-all-times/
I for one couldn't care less about what a Dallas investor wants 6th street to be.

I think we should all be extremely skeptical of Stream realty -- especially given their lackluster plans for the area. https://communityimpact.com/austin/south...th-plans-for-232-unit-mixed-use-project/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9705  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2025, 4:06 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by WesternSon View Post
Well, that is your .02, but the people are who actually making the investments to the buildings want the two traffic restored.

https://www.austinmonitor.com/stories/20...xth-street-open-to-traffic-at-all-times/
Yes, roll over backward to rich people by handing them out bad planning. Superb idea.
__________________
Houston: 2.4m (+3.9%) + MSA suburbs: 5.4m (+12%) + CSA exurbs: 200k (+5%)
Dallas: 1.3m (+2%) / FtW: 1.0m (+10%) + suburbs: 6.4m (9%) + exurbs: 566k (+9%)
San Antonio: 1.5m (+6%) + MSA suburbs: 1.2m (+10%) + CSA exurbs: 82k (+3%)
Austin: 994k (+3%) + MSA suburbs: 1.6m (+18%)
Texas (whole): 31.29m (+7%) / Texas (balance): 8.6m (+3%)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9706  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2025, 1:55 AM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,389
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9707  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2025, 4:47 PM
Croon Croon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2024
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigaven View Post
I think pedestrianizing 6th street is a better than pedestrianizing Congress. Especially with the upgrades they're proposing to the buildings and venues.
I agree. But I wish doing so was coupled with expanded Red Line schedule. One problem though is that with the overhaul of 35 on the horizon for several years, the downtown station will be dormant for a good while because of 35 construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9708  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2025, 10:52 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by Croon View Post
I agree. But I wish doing so was coupled with expanded Red Line schedule. One problem though is that with the overhaul of 35 on the horizon for several years, the downtown station will be dormant for a good while because of 35 construction.

It's hard to extend the red line schedule until they have full double tracking from Uptown to Downtown so they can run freight and Commuter rail on that section at the same time. They are still a very long time away from full double tracking.


So far, they have not said they will have to shut down red line service for an extended period but I just don't believe that. Both the 4th St and Airport Blvd crossing seem like 6 month closures to me but maybe I'm wrong.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9709  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2025, 1:01 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
It's hard to extend the red line schedule until they have full double tracking from Uptown to Downtown so they can run freight and Commuter rail on that section at the same time.
If this is the plan… I oppose. Temporal separation of freight and passenger is necessary and best practice in the vast majority of cases despite no longer being technically required by federal law.
__________________
Houston: 2.4m (+3.9%) + MSA suburbs: 5.4m (+12%) + CSA exurbs: 200k (+5%)
Dallas: 1.3m (+2%) / FtW: 1.0m (+10%) + suburbs: 6.4m (9%) + exurbs: 566k (+9%)
San Antonio: 1.5m (+6%) + MSA suburbs: 1.2m (+10%) + CSA exurbs: 82k (+3%)
Austin: 994k (+3%) + MSA suburbs: 1.6m (+18%)
Texas (whole): 31.29m (+7%) / Texas (balance): 8.6m (+3%)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9710  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2025, 3:33 PM
gillynova's Avatar
gillynova gillynova is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Austin / Bay Area
Posts: 2,807
Part 1 overview of Austin's future light rail. They're local and went into depth with nice Google Earth visuals!

Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9711  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2025, 6:36 PM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by gillynova View Post
Part 1 overview of Austin's future light rail. They're local and went into depth with nice Google Earth visuals!

Video Link
Already taken down?
__________________
Houston: 2.4m (+3.9%) + MSA suburbs: 5.4m (+12%) + CSA exurbs: 200k (+5%)
Dallas: 1.3m (+2%) / FtW: 1.0m (+10%) + suburbs: 6.4m (9%) + exurbs: 566k (+9%)
San Antonio: 1.5m (+6%) + MSA suburbs: 1.2m (+10%) + CSA exurbs: 82k (+3%)
Austin: 994k (+3%) + MSA suburbs: 1.6m (+18%)
Texas (whole): 31.29m (+7%) / Texas (balance): 8.6m (+3%)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9712  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2025, 9:22 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,581
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
If this is the plan… I oppose. Temporal separation of freight and passenger is necessary and best practice in the vast majority of cases despite no longer being technically required by federal law.
there's temporal separation and then there's _temporal separation_. There's a difference between running a freight train through a station a minute after a passenger train, and having to wait literally hours after the last passenger train to run freight and vice versa.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9713  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2025, 4:30 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver -> Austin
Posts: 5,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
there's temporal separation and then there's _temporal separation_. There's a difference between running a freight train through a station a minute after a passenger train, and having to wait literally hours after the last passenger train to run freight and vice versa.
I don’t think they should have to wait hours, either, but that’s entirely different than what freerover said:

Quote:
[…] so they can run freight and Commuter rail on that section at the same time.
Hence why I replied the way I replied. And besides, that’s not the point of double tracking anyway.

Source: an insider.
__________________
Houston: 2.4m (+3.9%) + MSA suburbs: 5.4m (+12%) + CSA exurbs: 200k (+5%)
Dallas: 1.3m (+2%) / FtW: 1.0m (+10%) + suburbs: 6.4m (9%) + exurbs: 566k (+9%)
San Antonio: 1.5m (+6%) + MSA suburbs: 1.2m (+10%) + CSA exurbs: 82k (+3%)
Austin: 994k (+3%) + MSA suburbs: 1.6m (+18%)
Texas (whole): 31.29m (+7%) / Texas (balance): 8.6m (+3%)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9714  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2025, 6:09 AM
Urbannizer's Avatar
Urbannizer Urbannizer is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX / Portland,OR / Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,565
Uber to Austin: get ready for Waymo

Quote:
Uber is getting ready for the launch of Waymo’s public robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, prompting customers to join a list of people interested in riding in the Alphabet-owned company’s AVs when they finally go live. It also revealed photos of the new co-branded robotaxis that will operate across a swath of the Texas capital as part of the new service.

Currently, Waymo isn’t open to the public in Austin. The company’s driverless vehicles are only available to a small group of people who joined Waymo’s waitlist to become early testers of the service. Waymo has not said when the service will open up to the broader public, but reading between the lines of this Uber announcement, it sounds like it may be soon.
Anyone else part of the beta group? I’m not a fan of them partnering with Uber given they have their own independent ride-share. The vehicles are quite responsive to other drivers. I feel safer than a Uber/Lyft.

Pros:
Responsive to other drivers abrupt behavior.
Can detect pedestrians and vehicles actions before they perform them
Pulls off quickly from a stop/light (thanks to the torque from the electric battery)
Music connectivity

Cons:
Not the most direct route
Goes the speed limit in the fast lane (can we program these to go +5-10 mph outside of residential areas or keep right outside of traffic hours?)
Slows down to designated limit in school zones even outside of hours

I took rides in the Cruise autonomous vehicles before they shuttered and I call tell you these are 1000x better.

__________________
HAIF
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9715  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2025, 4:46 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
I don’t think they should have to wait hours, either, but that’s entirely different than what freerover said:



Hence why I replied the way I replied. And besides, that’s not the point of double tracking anyway.

Source: an insider.
It was a stated and published goal at one point for Cap Metro to build out double tracking to allow for freight and commuter traffic so they can offer late night and commuter service. I'm not sure why that would have changed. The lack of late night services is one of the most common complaints on the red line.


There is no single "point" to double tracking. There are benefits to double tracking like more frequent service, less waiting etc and more flexibility with freight.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9716  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2025, 9:45 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,581
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
It was a stated and published goal at one point for Cap Metro to build out double tracking to allow for freight and commuter traffic so they can offer late night and commuter service. I'm not sure why that would have changed. The lack of late night services is one of the most common complaints on the red line.


There is no single "point" to double tracking. There are benefits to double tracking like more frequent service, less waiting etc and more flexibility with freight.
I think there's confusion/contention over "at the same time". I don't think the double tracking necessarily means that passengers and freight would literally be operating simultaneously (with a freight train passing through a station while there are passengers waiting there for a passenger train coming a minute later).

I don't have particular insight into CM's plans or scheduling, nor have they talked about it in that level of detail. But it seems like hypothetically late night service means at some point the passenger rail starts using a single line, runs that way several hours until say midnight, then freight starts running like a half hour later on the other line. AFAIK CM is currently precluded from running the two modes this close because of the shared line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9717  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2025, 10:07 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek View Post
I think there's confusion/contention over "at the same time". I don't think the double tracking necessarily means that passengers and freight would literally be operating simultaneously (with a freight train passing through a station while there are passengers waiting there for a passenger train coming a minute later).

I don't have particular insight into CM's plans or scheduling, nor have they talked about it in that level of detail. But it seems like hypothetically late night service means at some point the passenger rail starts using a single line, runs that way several hours until say midnight, then freight starts running like a half hour later on the other line. AFAIK CM is currently precluded from running the two modes this close because of the shared line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9718  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2025, 6:36 AM
electricron's Avatar
electricron electricron is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 3,614
Lightbulb

I think it is important to remember that CapMetro Rail had ordered their Stadler GTWs twice. Once before DCTA, North Texas COG, and Stadler went through the long effort to get their GTWs alternate compliant with the FRA. Which resulted in the new Alternate Compliance regulations issued by the FRA.
Second after the FRA Alternate compliance was in effect. It's entirely possible the last few GTWs order by CapMetro might be alternate compliant, and can run on CapMetro tracks with the very few freight trains running over it. And I have no idea what modifications they would have to make to the earlier GTWs to make them alternate compliant. Just suggesting that it could be done.

What I am certain is that the Stadler KISS and FLIRT trains built in Salt Lake City at the Stadler plant are FRA compliant, and that zero GTWs running in the USA were built there.
That's why I am suggesting they might be alternate compliant now, especially if they are suggesting they can operate with freight trains on the Red Line at the same time.,
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9719  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2025, 8:01 PM
JAM's Avatar
JAM JAM is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,631
Tesla Inc. will launch “unsupervised, self-driving” Cybercabs as a paid service in Austin this June, owner Elon Musk announced in a recent stakeholder call.

https://communityimpact.com/austin/south...-race-austin-launch-set-for-summer-2025/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9720  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2025, 12:12 AM
enragedcamel enragedcamel is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 520
What website can I check to see I-35 contruction/expansion progress in its various sections throughout the Austin area? I'm looking for something that shows timelines as well as percentage of completion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:05 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.