Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00
I would think Trump should really jolt Quebecers into thinking about the sovereignty question. He's looking at Canada the way McKinley was looking at Hawaii. He won't be the last. This makes the idea of an independent Quebec a lot more questionable. More than likely a breakup of Canada may well mean forced inclusion into the US for all of us. At what point will they say, "That's where we get a ton of resources, and where a lot of the electricity for the Northeast comes from. We should secure it."
|
There are a few variables here.
First, it depends a bit on how the Trump tariff crisis plays out. The idea that "if Canada can't do anything against the US, how would an independent Quebec do?" can potentially cut both ways. I think I've said this before but if Canada (and therefore Quebec) gets screwed big time by the US, what's the use of being in Canada for us? If we are going to get screwed anyway, may as well manage our own affairs without interference, sabotage and guilt-tripped by Ottawa and the ROC. We're gonna get screwed regardless. We may as well be living in our own house.
On this front however, I am a bit more optimistic about Canada's chances. So a plus for national unity.
Another thing is that it's unlikely that Quebec would be eligible for full US statehood, or even seek it. It is the least digestible province for the Americans. As such some type of associated status (someone has already laid out parameters earlier in the thread) could be interesting for Quebec as it wouldn't be economically, diplomatically and militarily isolated, being under the US umbrella, but the Americans wouldn't care much about what language or social/societal policies we have if we're not a state.
So there is that to consider as well.
All of which is just
politique-fiction of course.
Though so was Donald Trump becoming POTUS. Even once. Imagine twice!