Quote:
Originally Posted by reparcsyks
I was flamed for this before, but I don't see any more supertalls in Philly's future in our lifetimes. I would honestly love to be proved wrong, of course, but I can't think of one reason why any business in their right mind would build anything remotely close to the CITC specs in Philly in the next 50+ years.
The office job is dead and we don't have the tourism to support a supertall hotel/mixed-use complex.
I'm hoping for 1 or 2 more Laurels in my lifetime, but I think 300-500' will be the Philly sweetspot for future buildings.
Flame away...
|
1. Why bring it up again?
2. You can see 50 years in the future?
3. What satisfaction would you get if Philadelphia constructed another supertall? The city already has the tallest building outside of NYC & Chicago.
I get it, we like development and skyscrapers, but only NYC, Miami, and Austin have supertalls in their immediate future. I wish people would stop viewing a slowdown in skyscraper proposals as a Philly specific problem, because its not...
While on the topic, I would rather see the four proposed 500' towers built before one supertall. And I am confident Brandywine will deliver their ~500' tower on JFK within the next few years.