Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonianSentinel01
Canada spends hundreds of billions of dollars each year on social programs. That's something that has spiraled out of control as the bureaucracy has grown and isn't going to be sustainable. Healthcare is one of those, we should have a slight paying system as discussed on this forum before. That is what the comment on socialism was. Last time I checked the Liberals were best about bringing those programs and bureaucracy about. Last time I checked New Brunswick was part of Canada. Last time I checked Holt was part of the Liberal party.
That's not what you and the others were saying, now your going back on your word. You said that the party had gone too far to the right, stop going back on what you said. This isn't the first time that you change what you say. I've seen you do this before, if you can't keep yourself straight then I suggest you just stop typing.
Yes, I couldn't stand Stephen Harper, or Blain Higgs that much, but for me it was the lesser of the evils and I could care less how you vote.
|
What am I going back on my word about?. You are just misunderstanding me. Blaine Higgs campaign is running too far to the right, which is what I have said numerous times on here. Because of that the Liberals have picked up traditional blue seats by having moderate conservatives vote liberal. Moderate conservatives aren't voting for "socialism". We cant have productive conversations if we call everything centre left to social democracy "socialism".
There is countries who spend billions of dollars on strong safety nets, but still thrive under capitalism. Our friends in Denmark, Norway, Finland come to mind. These countries have strong economies and high quality of life. Anyway, I don't think you are looking for a respectful conversation so I'll leave it there.
Threaded Mode