Rustad refused to answer almost any questions, instead pivoting to vague anecdotes about the topic. At least one of them is dubious at best, and I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case for most of them. Apparently VPD and EHS could not confirm that there was an OD death last night like he had claimed to witness:
https://www.nsnews.com/economy-law-polit...h-to-stall-surging-conservatives-9634510
One of his last stories was especially strange, where he claimed an indigenous woman gave him a gift and then thanked him for all he'd done for the community, instead of actually saying what he's done for them. He then compared the relationship between FN and the province as that of parent and child, which is a pretty 1960s way of thinking.
I suspect his team told him to focus on anecdotes and stories to draw attention from their lack of solutions. It's pretty telling that anecdotes are more important to him than actual statistics and research results into what works and what doesn't. He also has a lot of complaints, but not a lot of solutions, and as Eby pointed out, when he does have a solution, he pivots back and forth on it depending on the audience (are they going to provide safe supply and supportive housing or not?).
The cringiest moment for me was him describing a meme with someone snorting cocaine with a plastic straw and the caption being "only one of these is legal". Are we really bringing memes into debates and policy decisions?