HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2024, 8:55 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is online now
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 36,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin View Post
Sure, in theory we probably could ramp up construction sufficiently to meet demand (in much the same way that we could mobilize an entire society to beat the Axis in WWII) but it would take a massive, coordinated effort and centralised reallocation of labour and resources and reorientation of our economy to one primary focused on the construction of homes. Which then begs the question of: why? What do we actually gain from extreme population growth, and is it worth allocating a disproportionately high amount of resources just to house that growth?
I wonder not just about why, but whether Canada has the capacity to do this right now. This country is struggling with inflation and a general difficulty building new housing and infrastructure. The immigration rate is much easier to fix with government policy levers than the housing supply and infrastructure.

After WW2 Canada did have the government and private capacity to quickly and efficiently execute large housing projects.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:47 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.