HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #421  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2024, 5:43 PM
DTcrawler DTcrawler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 853
We love to shoot ourselves in the foot. In a city where every penny spent is endlessly scrutinized, we’re turning down potentially millions of dollars from developers to help pay for initiatives. Comical.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #422  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2024, 6:05 PM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 691
Good, it's not a councillors job to extort devs trying to build housing, there are already dev fees, school fees, Parkland fees, and etc to pay for these things. If council wants more then that raise property taxes.

Also find it funny that is Menard, Leiper, and what do you know Brockington asking for them being allowed to "ask" for donations up there ward before housing can be built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #423  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2024, 6:15 PM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 691
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTcrawler View Post
We love to shoot ourselves in the foot. In a city where every penny spent is endlessly scrutinized, we’re turning down potentially millions of dollars from developers to help pay for initiatives. Comical.
Staff can still negotiate and if anyone thinks that this will result in less "donations", I would say, maybe ask why it would.....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #424  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2024, 1:59 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 25,770
Lansdowne going to cost all of us a 1% property tax increase.

Quote:

The AG reported that:

The City is not following its own costing guidelines, and as a result, is underreporting the construction costs of Lansdowne 2.0 by $74 million. Total project cost should be $493 million, not the $419 million the City has been saying.

There is considerable risk in the financial projections, which could significantly reduce the revenues available to the City to pay down debt. For example, RedBlacks revenue projections are far beyond what the team has been able to achieve in recent years. And the RedBlacks owners have only committed to keeping the team in Ottawa until 2032. There is a material risk that the CFL franchise could fold, as has happened twice before in Ottawa.

....

$493 million in construction costs amount to about $20 million a year in debt servicing for 30 years. That $20 million is equivalent to a 1% property tax increase for all residents and businesses in Ottawa.

Lansdowne will produce no significant revenue for at least a decade. It is possible that after a decade or two there will be some revenue to cover a share of that debt servicing. But if Lansdowne 2.0 turns out anything like the original Lansdowne proposal, taxpayers can expect to see only a small amount of what we were promised.

The best case scenario is that we all shoulder a 1% tax increase now, and maybe we get some of that back in the future. Maybe it’s only our kids who see any significant return.

....
https://the613.substack.com/p/lansdo...dRedirect=true
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #425  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2024, 2:57 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
Lansdowne going to cost all of us a 1% property tax increase.
Sunk Cost fallacy. We need to focus on what is critical and build housing to pay for it. Stop the sleight of hand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #426  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2024, 1:31 PM
Lakeofthewood Lakeofthewood is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Downtown Ottawa
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by YOWetal View Post
Sunk Cost fallacy. We need to focus on what is critical and build housing to pay for it. Stop the sleight of hand.
You're not wrong, but I do think it is worth calling these things out in Ottawa, where for so long the current and previous mayors have run on keeping property taxes low, while public services go to crap.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #427  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2024, 2:58 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,349
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lakeofthewood View Post
You're not wrong, but I do think it is worth calling these things out in Ottawa, where for so long the current and previous mayors have run on keeping property taxes low, while public services go to crap.
Municipal cheapskatery is rampant across the country. It's a political cultural problem.
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #428  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2024, 11:15 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
Municipal cheapskatery is rampant across the country. It's a political cultural problem.
Yeah let's poll people if they want to pay $500 each to have a worldclass staidum and arena with a nice green roof. I bet they wouldn't agree to $50.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #429  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2024, 3:48 AM
DTcrawler DTcrawler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by YOWetal View Post
Yeah let's poll people if they want to pay $500 each to have a worldclass staidum and arena with a nice green roof. I bet they wouldn't agree to $50.
The problem is it's mostly the same people who don't want to pay more taxes who continually whine about the lack of amenities and services.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #430  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2024, 11:15 AM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 17,119
Night mayor got an article in the Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com/world/ar...da-night-mayor
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #431  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2024, 6:15 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,893
Controversial developer donations policy punted to working group
4-member group will work to clarify what councillors should, shouldn't do

Elyse Skura · CBC News
Posted: Jul 11, 2024 10:30 AM EDT | Last Updated: 2 hours ago


The contentious debate over whether to ban councillors from negotiating donations for their wards sparked confusion around the council table on Wednesday, as the city clerk struggled to answer a litany of questions on hypothetical no-go scenarios.

By the time the 90-minute discussion was over, many councillors complained about a lack of clarity surrounding the policy options on the table.

While Mayor Mark Sutcliffe has said multiple times that there was no need pause the plan to seek a consensus that he seems to consider far out of reach, full council opted to forego an immediate decision and send the debated staff report to a newly formed working group.

"I know there are a lot of strong feelings about this issue. I've always said ... my preference would be to ban voluntary contributions," Sutcliffe said after the meeting.

"I know some councillors said they saw this as a solution in search of a problem, but I don't see it that way. There is a perception that there's a risk here — the conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest — and we don't want the development process to be tainted."

But the policy, once it's in place, has the potential to reach beyond the development process and could bring unintended consequences.

The list of possible breaches was lengthy.

<more>

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...roup-1.7260341
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #432  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2024, 3:56 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 12,893
Ottawa facing stiff competition in search for next chief planner
Toronto, Hamilton also hunting to fill the key management spot

Elyse Skura · CBC News
Posted: Jul 17, 2024 4:00 AM EDT | Last Updated: 2 hours ago


Ontario's three biggest cities are all on the hunt for a top bureaucrat who can lead them through the challenge of meeting aggressive housing targets, during a time when experts say hiring and retaining top talent is keeping municipal leaders up at night.

Ottawa began its search for a new general manager of planning at the end of 2022, but failed to find a good fit in its first national search. Now it's trying again.

Between scouting efforts, the city shook up its bureaucracy with a new strategic initiative department that's meant to relieve some of the pressure heaped on planning chiefs from higher levels of government.

But with Toronto and Hamilton embarking on their own searches, experts say competition will be stiff — and the pressure on interim chiefs nearly unbearable.

The chief planner bears the weight of meeting mandated growth targets while ensuring a sustainable approach.

That has meant tense and time-consuming negotiations with both provincial and federal governments, along with a proposed major overhaul to the rules that govern development.

"It's such an important position right now when you think about mandates from the province around local governments needing to do their part and building more homes," explained Stacy Hushion, vice-president of consultancy firm StrategyCorp's government relations and management consulting division.

"But at the same time, there's a limited pool of talent."

Wendy Stephanson, Ottawa's city manager, is keenly aware of that challenge and said municipalities and private companies share the same pressures.

"It's everywhere," she told reporters earlier this year. "Everybody has to look at how they're recruiting."

Freed from the need to lead strategic negotiations, Ottawa's newly reshaped planning department is now "laser focused" on traditional city building, Stephanson said.

The city's planners have not only faced intense public scrutiny on major developments, including a subdivision planned far from the urban boundary and the second phase of the struggling Lansdowne Park public-private partnership, but must also navigate a constantly shifting policy environment.

Stephanson describes an environment where housing directives change almost weekly — or what Lindsay Jones, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario's director of policy and government relations, calls a "perfect storm."

It "says a lot" that Ottawa and other cities have had to reorganize departments to meet external demands, she said.

"It's been really a combination of these long-term, long-standing structural issues that are the result of downloading in the 1990s, but then combined with the incredible growth pressures that municipalities are now being asked to support," Jones explained.

Ottawa-based housing policy researcher Carolyn Whitzman likewise said it's "a very confusing landscape" for planners, particularly in smaller municipalities.
As for how interim chief planners can navigate this "era of rapid change," Whitzman argued "it's almost impossible."

With the city adjusting to wave after wave of provincial legislation, managers have long been bracing for another major shift: the "grey tsunami."

Retirements have forced substantial change, with Ottawa seeing a rapid and ongoing turnover in upper management. Hushion doesn't see that changing.

"[Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System] data shows that tens of thousands of municipal employees are on track to retire anywhere between this year, over the next three years," she said.

Many are now poaching from other municipalities, added David Arbuckle, who heads the Association of Municipal Managers, Clerks and Treasurers of Ontario.

They agree the shift will require two things: a new and more flexible approach to recruitment, and a plan to better support staff with the chops to become future leaders.

While the public service was one thought of as a career for "lifers," Arbuckle said a generational shift has changed the long-term outlook of staff. So has an increasingly toxic discourse that's seen people move from attacking politicians to targeting the rank and file.

"Sometimes there's a blurring of the line between those roles. And then we've also seen a decline in civil discourse, more confrontation, more hostility towards municipal staff, primarily from the public," he said.

"That has really caused current staff to question their role. Is that something they want to be a part of?"

Hushion, who leads an annual survey of chief administrative officers across Ontario, said municipal staff worked diligently throughout the pandemic to ensure lights stayed on, garbage was picked up and toilets flushed, and "that took a toll."

While municipalities have been considered "notoriously slow to change," Hushion said there has been an acknowledgement that there needs to be creative solutions to retain people long thought of as "lifers."

She said staff need to target areas that contribute to burnout, including the "fishbowl" atmosphere and need for flexible working conditions, along with providing competitive salaries.

The city's efforts to break down silos between departments will expose staff to more program areas and help retain institutional knowledge, said Stephanson.

"Somebody else can move into another role, learn and grow specifically around the strategic projects area," she explained. "You might go off to a new job because you've got new tools in your toolkit, or you might go back to your old job, bring those things with you."

The experiment is already showing signs of progress, with the interim chief of the new strategic initiatives department, Ryan Perrault, set to take over for the retiring general manager of emergency services.

Stephanson said the focus is on stabilizing the reshuffled departments, with the recruitment process for a new planning chief set to continue through the fall.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...nner-1.7265129
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #433  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2024, 4:11 PM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
Ottawa facing stiff competition in search for next chief planner
Toronto, Hamilton also hunting to fill the key management spot

Elyse Skura · CBC News
Posted: Jul 17, 2024 4:00 AM EDT | Last Updated: 2 hours ago


Ontario's three biggest cities are all on the hunt for a top bureaucrat who can lead them through the challenge of meeting aggressive housing targets, during a time when experts say hiring and retaining top talent is keeping municipal leaders up at night.

Ottawa began its search for a new general manager of planning at the end of 2022, but failed to find a good fit in its first national search. Now it's trying again.

Between scouting efforts, the city shook up its bureaucracy with a new strategic initiative department that's meant to relieve some of the pressure heaped on planning chiefs from higher levels of government.

But with Toronto and Hamilton embarking on their own searches, experts say competition will be stiff — and the pressure on interim chiefs nearly unbearable.

The chief planner bears the weight of meeting mandated growth targets while ensuring a sustainable approach.

That has meant tense and time-consuming negotiations with both provincial and federal governments, along with a proposed major overhaul to the rules that govern development.

"It's such an important position right now when you think about mandates from the province around local governments needing to do their part and building more homes," explained Stacy Hushion, vice-president of consultancy firm StrategyCorp's government relations and management consulting division.

"But at the same time, there's a limited pool of talent."

Wendy Stephanson, Ottawa's city manager, is keenly aware of that challenge and said municipalities and private companies share the same pressures.

"It's everywhere," she told reporters earlier this year. "Everybody has to look at how they're recruiting."

Freed from the need to lead strategic negotiations, Ottawa's newly reshaped planning department is now "laser focused" on traditional city building, Stephanson said.

The city's planners have not only faced intense public scrutiny on major developments, including a subdivision planned far from the urban boundary and the second phase of the struggling Lansdowne Park public-private partnership, but must also navigate a constantly shifting policy environment.

Stephanson describes an environment where housing directives change almost weekly — or what Lindsay Jones, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario's director of policy and government relations, calls a "perfect storm."

It "says a lot" that Ottawa and other cities have had to reorganize departments to meet external demands, she said.

"It's been really a combination of these long-term, long-standing structural issues that are the result of downloading in the 1990s, but then combined with the incredible growth pressures that municipalities are now being asked to support," Jones explained.

Ottawa-based housing policy researcher Carolyn Whitzman likewise said it's "a very confusing landscape" for planners, particularly in smaller municipalities.
As for how interim chief planners can navigate this "era of rapid change," Whitzman argued "it's almost impossible."

With the city adjusting to wave after wave of provincial legislation, managers have long been bracing for another major shift: the "grey tsunami."

Retirements have forced substantial change, with Ottawa seeing a rapid and ongoing turnover in upper management. Hushion doesn't see that changing.

"[Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System] data shows that tens of thousands of municipal employees are on track to retire anywhere between this year, over the next three years," she said.

Many are now poaching from other municipalities, added David Arbuckle, who heads the Association of Municipal Managers, Clerks and Treasurers of Ontario.

They agree the shift will require two things: a new and more flexible approach to recruitment, and a plan to better support staff with the chops to become future leaders.

While the public service was one thought of as a career for "lifers," Arbuckle said a generational shift has changed the long-term outlook of staff. So has an increasingly toxic discourse that's seen people move from attacking politicians to targeting the rank and file.

"Sometimes there's a blurring of the line between those roles. And then we've also seen a decline in civil discourse, more confrontation, more hostility towards municipal staff, primarily from the public," he said.

"That has really caused current staff to question their role. Is that something they want to be a part of?"

Hushion, who leads an annual survey of chief administrative officers across Ontario, said municipal staff worked diligently throughout the pandemic to ensure lights stayed on, garbage was picked up and toilets flushed, and "that took a toll."

While municipalities have been considered "notoriously slow to change," Hushion said there has been an acknowledgement that there needs to be creative solutions to retain people long thought of as "lifers."

She said staff need to target areas that contribute to burnout, including the "fishbowl" atmosphere and need for flexible working conditions, along with providing competitive salaries.

The city's efforts to break down silos between departments will expose staff to more program areas and help retain institutional knowledge, said Stephanson.

"Somebody else can move into another role, learn and grow specifically around the strategic projects area," she explained. "You might go off to a new job because you've got new tools in your toolkit, or you might go back to your old job, bring those things with you."

The experiment is already showing signs of progress, with the interim chief of the new strategic initiatives department, Ryan Perrault, set to take over for the retiring general manager of emergency services.

Stephanson said the focus is on stabilizing the reshuffled departments, with the recruitment process for a new planning chief set to continue through the fall.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottaw...nner-1.7265129
The fact that they have been searching since late 2022 and still don't have a candidate is telling. They are on at least their 2nd 'interim' chief planner and that person has a background in transportation planning and I believe they will retire once a permanent person is in place. The previous interim person retired a few months ago.

I deal with the City daily in my job and it is a terrible disfunctional place to work with so many people 'temporary managers' or 'interim managers' or 'acting managers' (I find that term funny but most of the people I deal with at the City don't find it funny) and it doesn't surprise me that they are having a hard time attracting a quality head of the department.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #434  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2024, 5:03 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 25,112
This is to replace Alain Miguelez? Ha no idea the search was still on.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #435  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2024, 6:08 PM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
This is to replace Alain Miguelez? Ha no idea the search was still on.
No I believe it is to replace Steve Willis.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #436  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2024, 6:58 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 25,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proof Sheet View Post
No I believe it is to replace Steve Willis.
Right. Forgot about Willis.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #437  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2024, 3:26 AM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 691
Unsurprisingly, Horizon Ottawa broke election regs...
https://ottawa.ctvnews.ca/audit-find...tion-1.6983789

Last edited by Williamoforange; Jul 31, 2024 at 3:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #438  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2024, 7:33 AM
DTcrawler DTcrawler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 853
Watch, somehow they'll manage to attribute the allegations to the fact that "developers bad".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #439  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2024, 1:54 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 25,770
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTcrawler View Post
Watch, somehow they'll manage to attribute the allegations to the fact that "developers bad".
Should we give developers and the hold they have on our municipal politicians a pass?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #440  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2024, 3:01 PM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
Should we give developers and the hold they have on our municipal politicians a pass?
Lmao, if devs have the hold on council that Horizon think they did why is Ottawa new zoning bylaw still underzoning the majority of the city. 4 story limits downtown, and across from mass transit stations.

The only thing Horizon brings to light trending dev is that they don't like private housing being built. There follow the money is a farce and a half that includes plumbers, electricians, and Daniel Alfredsson because his brother happens to build boutique homes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:23 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.