HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #401  
Old Posted May 14, 2024, 9:20 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,707
Diane Deans, who sat on Ottawa city council for 28 years, has died
'She wore her heart on her sleeve,' says former councillor

Elyse Skura · CBC News · Posted: May 14, 2024 4:56 PM EDT | Last Updated: 7 minutes ago


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/di...-council-for-28-years-has-died-1.7198785
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #402  
Old Posted May 30, 2024, 3:51 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 29,151
Chianello: Diane Deans was tenacious, passionate, sometimes frustrating — and utterly committed

As an Ottawa city hall reporter and columnist, I sometimes disagreed with the longtime councillor. But she and her staff knew their stuff and zeroed in on what mattered.

Author of the article:Joanne Chianello, Special to the Citizen
Published May 16, 2024 • Last updated May 16, 2024 • 4 minute read


A reporter’s promise of confidentiality extends beyond this life, which is how I found myself on the section couch with Diane Deans in her home this past Monday. I had come to say goodbye, but also to get her blessing to tell how she helped me break what would be one of the biggest stories of my career.

It was winter of 2019, and I had discovered that SNC-Lavalin (now called AtkinsRéalis) was the city’s choice for the $1.6-billion Trillium Line extension, despite failing – twice! – to score the required minimum 70 per cent in the bidding process. My source couldn’t go on the record, and to publish I needed confirmation from at least two more people.

I had worked at it for weeks, but no dice. With council set to approve the contract on March 6, I considered who else at city hall might help.

Why did I go to Deans? I knew she would be outraged, wouldn’t reveal my source, and would try to help, unlike others who suggested I “keep digging” or “follow the money.” As one of Ottawa’s longest-serving councillors, Deans knew a lot of people and I was hoping she could convince someone to speak with me.

That didn’t work out. But Deans didn’t drop it. At the council meeting, she interrogated city staff and lawyers. They wouldn’t say whether SNC-Lavalin had hit that 70 per cent score. What’s more, the hired legal — told councillors they were not even allowed to ask the question.

Deans was flabbergasted.

“Not our high-priced lawyer, not senior city staff, not our fairness commissioner can sit in front of us and answer a simple question,” she said, adding she “got a song and dance.” (I included that clip in any story I could.)

The evasions outraged the city and her probing helped convince others to confirm to me that SNC-Lavalin had failed to meet that required score, allowing me to report the story. Some would have preferred otherwise. Not Deans.

Watch city hall for any length of time and you’ll soon see who around the council horseshoe has read a report closely and who has skimmed the executive summary. Deans and her staff — largely women — dug into details, knew their stuff and zeroed in on what mattered.

Reporters sitting on media row always leaned in when Deans’s mic was turned on. We were about to hear a question that hit at the heart of an issue — and get a good quote to boot!

She enjoyed the spotlight but was happy to share it, especially with other women. She launched her annual International Women’s Day Breakfast in the mid-1990s, just a couple of years after being elected — and before such events became de rigueur.

None of this is to say Deans was an angel. She relished the political realm, understood the personality dynamics involved and wasn’t above using them to her advantage. She could frustrate city colleagues by acting on her own, like the time she unilaterally, and successfully, applied for federal money for a community kitchen in the Albion-Heatherington Recreation Centre.

She had a knack for messaging. Being named the chair of the Ottawa Police Services Board in 2018 could have been considered a demotion from her longstanding leadership of the community services committee. But Deans took control of the narrative, boasting she was the board’s first woman chair.

I asked her on Monday what kept her in council, and in politics, for 28 long years. She said that she always told herself she’d leave when she stopped having fun.

That moment didn’t come until very late in the game.

During her final term, worsening tensions between Deans and former mayor Jim Watson were no secret.

When she unilaterally hired a new temporary police chief in the middle of the so-called “Freedom Convoy” in February 2022, politics finally tripped her up.

As police board chair, she was legally allowed to make that hire, even without informing council. But her colleagues didn’t agree with her call. They removed her in an uncommonly chaotic and emotional council meeting. Deans never got over what she felt was personal betrayal.

Over the years, we had often disagreed, including over some details around her hiring of a new chief. That was hard: I respected and liked her, and had seen how the former mayor treated her, from cutting off her mic during a debate over an LRT inquiry to refusing to let her ask a question at a committee she didn’t sit on.

But, during our last visit, Deans wasn’t dwelling on rifts and recriminations. In a flattering pixie cut, wearing a soft pink sweater, she looked as beautiful as ever as we laughed and gossiped about — what else? — city politics. She wanted to dive into the taxi class-action lawsuit decision that had just come down that day.

Her willingness to agree to disagree, stay engaged, and keep laughing are all too rare these days, not just in politics, but in society at large. Diane Deans played the angles, but also pressed her case, even if she was tired, even if some might not like it. She drew out the best in people and worked to make things better. Like many in this city, I’m missing her already.

https://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/chiane...etimes-frustrating-and-utterly-committed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #403  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2024, 6:06 PM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,813
I was running errands today and all I can say is that Ottawa looks very unkempt, with two and three feet of grass and weeds in road allowances and parkland all over the place. It is a disgrace.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #404  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2024, 6:27 PM
DTcrawler DTcrawler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 998
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
I was running errands today and all I can say is that Ottawa looks very unkempt, with two and three feet of grass and weeds in road allowances and parkland all over the place. It is a disgrace.
It happens every spring - the city's summer crews are never up to speed in time for the warm weather. It's kind of like how the construction season only "officially" started on June 3 and lifeguard duty at beaches only begins on June 15, despite the weather having been favourable for both activities for well over a month now.

That being said, it's not unique to Ottawa. I recently saw a post from a GTA city (Burlington I think) in response to widespread resident complaints similar to yours. They explained that this spring's conditions have been highly favourable for rapid grass/weed growth and combined with the recent heavy rainfall, it's led to crews falling behind on regular maintenance.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #405  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2024, 6:37 PM
Lakeofthewood Lakeofthewood is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Downtown Ottawa
Posts: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTcrawler View Post
It happens every spring - the city's summer crews are never up to speed in time for the warm weather. It's kind of like how the construction season only "officially" started on June 3 and lifeguard duty at beaches only begins on June 15, despite the weather having been favourable for both activities for well over a month now.

That being said, it's not unique to Ottawa. I recently saw a post from a GTA city (Burlington I think) in response to widespread resident complaints similar to yours. They explained that this spring's conditions have been highly favourable for rapid grass/weed growth and combined with the recent heavy rainfall, it's led to crews falling behind on regular maintenance.
A few councillors specifically mentioned it in their e-blasts last week too, that because of the rain the last month things are higher than normal. Apparently they aim to keep the grass height between 60-75mm and not more than 100mm unless the area is in a designated naturalization area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #406  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2024, 3:05 PM
Proof Sheet Proof Sheet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,986
Quote:
Originally Posted by Proof Sheet View Post
Even more troubling..he is a proud Nickelback fan

https://twitter.com/TimTierney/status/1709258486452744494/photo/1
Just watching today's Planning Committee meeting and Tierney is not even making an attempt to be engaged and watching and participating. He's got his camera on and is turned sideways and seems to be reading something on his phone all of the time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #407  
Old Posted Jun 21, 2024, 1:48 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,707
$300,000 donation from developer Katasa back on the table in Ottawa
In January, the company withdrew from a memorandum of understanding to spend $300,000 on traffic-calming and other measures.

Blair Crawford, Ottawa Citizen
Published Jun 20, 2024 • Last updated 14 hours ago • 2 minute read


A $300,000 charitable donation by Developer Katasa Group will go ahead after all.

The Gatineau-based developer said Thursday it had decided to make $100,000 donations to three Ottawa-area charities yet to be named.

In January, Katasa withdrew from a memorandum of understanding brokered with Capital Ward Coun. Shawn Menard to spend $300,000 on traffic-calming and affordable housing in the ward to offset the impact of its 22-storey tower at the intersection of Carling and Bronson avenues.

The deal outraged other councillors, who wanted the money shared across the city. Orléans East-Cumberland Coun. Matthew Luloff likened it to a “slush fund” and warned the deal “didn’t pass the smell test.” Mayor Mark Sutcliffe said he wanted similar deals banned, preferring donations be made to third-party groups rather than paying for measures the city offers itself.

In the end, that was what Katasa decided to do.

In a statement, Katasa partner Katherine Chowieri said the company “cannot overstate our regret for the misconception about our intended $300,000 donation to the City of Ottawa. As we said then, we genuinely believed this type of donation was common and part of the City of Ottawa’s process for approving land developments. We now know, of course, that it is not.”

But Chowieri said the company still wanted “our donation to have a meaningful and lasting impact on the City of Ottawa.”

“That’s why we are announcing our plans to support three Ottawa charities, with $100,000 each. The foundation of our city is its charitable sector, and making tangible change starts with empowering and investing in these organizations and the hard-working people who represent them on the front lines.”

She said more details on the donation would be made later in the summer, adding she hoped it would rebuild community trust in the company.

“The events earlier this year were regrettable. For that, we are sorry. Our announcement today builds upon our relationship with the City of Ottawa and the residents who call this great city home,” Chowieri said.

Menard said Thursday that he was pleased that Katasa would be giving money to charity, and he defended MOUs like the one he negotiated with Katasa as “common practice” that could lead to better outcomes for a community.

“My job is to listen and to advocate for my residents and to try to ensure that new development leads to benefits for both existing and future residents — like affordable housing and traffic safety,” Menard said.

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/300000-donation-katasa-ottawa
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #408  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2024, 5:33 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,707
Committee votes to ban councillors from brokering developer donations to wards
Perceived conflict of interest weighed against potential loss of funding for communities

Elyse Skura · CBC News
Posted: Jul 03, 2024 4:00 AM EDT | Last Updated: 10 hours ago


City councillors should not engage in discussions with developers over "voluntary contributions" to their wards, members of Ottawa's finance and corporate services committee decided Tuesday.

But the vote came with more heated debate, as several councillors argued the decision would unfairly tie their hands.

Staff came up with two options for councillors to consider: adopt a framework that establishes guardrails for these discussions, or expressly prohibit the practice.

Coun. Laura Dudas put forward a motion for the ban, successfully arguing that this would eliminate any "perceived" influence. She argued that developers may feel a donation is required to gain the councillor's support — and vote.

"We have heard from staff that my motion does not prohibit councillors from doing their role, which is to be advocates, stewards and the biggest cheerleaders for their communities," she said.

"It will continue to allow us to be involved in every aspect that we need to be. What it will not allow us is to be at the table asking for cash to build a gazebo that we could then cut a ribbon at."

If council opts to support the ban, planning staff could still enable negotiations between developers and the community. Those talks would be much more narrowly focused on the area directly surrounding a new development, the city's director of planning told councillors.

The donation issue exploded around the council table in January, when councillors debated a motion from Capital Coun. Shawn Menard to accept a $300,000 donation from developer Groupe Katasa.

That discussion at times leaned toward insinuating that Menard's negotiations were tantamount to extortion. The integrity commissioner stopped short of making an official finding on the now-withdrawn donation, calling the question a policy matter.

Menard said on Tuesday that this has been a political "hit job," and that the committee's decision puts councillors "down a slippery slope."

Coun. Jeff Leiper, who unsuccessfully pushed his colleagues to keep the status quo, lamented that councillors are becoming "increasingly less important" in the decision-making process.

"This is a solution that is looking for a problem," said Leiper. "We don't have a plethora of city councillors who are successfully negotiating deals with developers to go over and above what the statute requires."

Councillors Cathy Curry, Glen Gower, George Darouze, Tim Tierney and Matt Luloff voted with Dudas and the mayor in favour of the ban. Councillors Riley Brockington and Rawlson King voted with Menard and Leiper against it.

Since this debate began, councillors have argued over whether it's possible to negotiate with developers while making it clear that any donation would be entirely voluntary.

Brockington argued 99 per cent of developers understand they don't have to make a donation, and said a short-sighted ban will lose communities "millions" in potential funding for traffic calming, affordable housing and more.

But Jason Burggraaf, executive director of the Greater Ottawa Home Builders' Association, told CBC that the situation can leave even the most experienced corporations with the wrong impression.

"I have been told of instances where people did feel that way, and some said yes and they went ahead. Others said no and didn't feel like they got much ramification from it," he said.

Discussing a donation with someone who has the power to vote against your proposed development naturally creates a power imbalance, he argued.

Dudas agreed, saying this decision allows councillors "to take the high ground."

Mayor Mark Sutcliffe, who has made his desire for a ban clear for months, said this was a healthy and respectful discussion among councillors at both ends of the spectrum.

"There are councillors who are trying to uphold the principle of their ability to be involved in advancing interests in their community, and then there are councillors who are trying to uphold the principle of avoiding conflicts of interest," he told CBC.

Asked if a compromise is possible, Sutcliffe said he's open to discussion but believes the ban is "a good solution."

"It doesn't stop members of the community from being involved in advocating for their needs. It doesn't stop companies from making contributions from negotiating with staff," he said. "It just removes councillors from being part of those discussions."

The committee approved a separate motion by King that would see staff further review a possible framework for councillor-negotiated donations and report back next fall.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/co...g-developer-donations-to-wards-1.7252319
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #409  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2024, 5:43 PM
DTcrawler DTcrawler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 998
We love to shoot ourselves in the foot. In a city where every penny spent is endlessly scrutinized, we’re turning down potentially millions of dollars from developers to help pay for initiatives. Comical.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #410  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2024, 6:05 PM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 887
Good, it's not a councillors job to extort devs trying to build housing, there are already dev fees, school fees, Parkland fees, and etc to pay for these things. If council wants more then that raise property taxes.

Also find it funny that is Menard, Leiper, and what do you know Brockington asking for them being allowed to "ask" for donations up there ward before housing can be built.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #411  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2024, 6:15 PM
Williamoforange's Avatar
Williamoforange Williamoforange is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTcrawler View Post
We love to shoot ourselves in the foot. In a city where every penny spent is endlessly scrutinized, we’re turning down potentially millions of dollars from developers to help pay for initiatives. Comical.
Staff can still negotiate and if anyone thinks that this will result in less "donations", I would say, maybe ask why it would.....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #412  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2024, 1:59 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 29,130
Lansdowne going to cost all of us a 1% property tax increase.

Quote:

The AG reported that:

The City is not following its own costing guidelines, and as a result, is underreporting the construction costs of Lansdowne 2.0 by $74 million. Total project cost should be $493 million, not the $419 million the City has been saying.

There is considerable risk in the financial projections, which could significantly reduce the revenues available to the City to pay down debt. For example, RedBlacks revenue projections are far beyond what the team has been able to achieve in recent years. And the RedBlacks owners have only committed to keeping the team in Ottawa until 2032. There is a material risk that the CFL franchise could fold, as has happened twice before in Ottawa.

....

$493 million in construction costs amount to about $20 million a year in debt servicing for 30 years. That $20 million is equivalent to a 1% property tax increase for all residents and businesses in Ottawa.

Lansdowne will produce no significant revenue for at least a decade. It is possible that after a decade or two there will be some revenue to cover a share of that debt servicing. But if Lansdowne 2.0 turns out anything like the original Lansdowne proposal, taxpayers can expect to see only a small amount of what we were promised.

The best case scenario is that we all shoulder a 1% tax increase now, and maybe we get some of that back in the future. Maybe it’s only our kids who see any significant return.

....
https://the613.substack.com/p/lansdowne-will-be-a-1-property-tax?triedRedirect=true
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #413  
Old Posted Jul 5, 2024, 2:57 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truenorth00 View Post
Lansdowne going to cost all of us a 1% property tax increase.
Sunk Cost fallacy. We need to focus on what is critical and build housing to pay for it. Stop the sleight of hand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #414  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2024, 1:31 PM
Lakeofthewood Lakeofthewood is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Downtown Ottawa
Posts: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by YOWetal View Post
Sunk Cost fallacy. We need to focus on what is critical and build housing to pay for it. Stop the sleight of hand.
You're not wrong, but I do think it is worth calling these things out in Ottawa, where for so long the current and previous mayors have run on keeping property taxes low, while public services go to —.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #415  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2024, 2:58 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lakeofthewood View Post
You're not wrong, but I do think it is worth calling these things out in Ottawa, where for so long the current and previous mayors have run on keeping property taxes low, while public services go to —.
Municipal cheapskatery is rampant across the country. It's a political cultural problem.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #416  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2024, 11:15 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau View Post
Municipal cheapskatery is rampant across the country. It's a political cultural problem.
Yeah let's poll people if they want to pay $500 each to have a worldclass staidum and arena with a nice green roof. I bet they wouldn't agree to $50.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #417  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2024, 3:48 AM
DTcrawler DTcrawler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 998
Quote:
Originally Posted by YOWetal View Post
Yeah let's poll people if they want to pay $500 each to have a worldclass staidum and arena with a nice green roof. I bet they wouldn't agree to $50.
The problem is it's mostly the same people who don't want to pay more taxes who continually whine about the lack of amenities and services.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #418  
Old Posted Jul 9, 2024, 11:15 AM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,932
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #419  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2024, 6:15 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,707
Controversial developer donations policy punted to working group
4-member group will work to clarify what councillors should, shouldn't do

Elyse Skura · CBC News
Posted: Jul 11, 2024 10:30 AM EDT | Last Updated: 2 hours ago


The contentious debate over whether to ban councillors from negotiating donations for their wards sparked confusion around the council table on Wednesday, as the city clerk struggled to answer a litany of questions on hypothetical no-go scenarios.

By the time the 90-minute discussion was over, many councillors complained about a lack of clarity surrounding the policy options on the table.

While Mayor Mark Sutcliffe has said multiple times that there was no need pause the plan to seek a consensus that he seems to consider far out of reach, full council opted to forego an immediate decision and send the debated staff report to a newly formed working group.

"I know there are a lot of strong feelings about this issue. I've always said ... my preference would be to ban voluntary contributions," Sutcliffe said after the meeting.

"I know some councillors said they saw this as a solution in search of a problem, but I don't see it that way. There is a perception that there's a risk here — the conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest — and we don't want the development process to be tainted."

But the policy, once it's in place, has the potential to reach beyond the development process and could bring unintended consequences.

The list of possible breaches was lengthy.

<more>

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/co...policy-punted-to-working-group-1.7260341
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #420  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2024, 3:56 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,707
Ottawa facing stiff competition in search for next chief planner
Toronto, Hamilton also hunting to fill the key management spot

Elyse Skura · CBC News
Posted: Jul 17, 2024 4:00 AM EDT | Last Updated: 2 hours ago


Ontario's three biggest cities are all on the hunt for a top bureaucrat who can lead them through the challenge of meeting aggressive housing targets, during a time when experts say hiring and retaining top talent is keeping municipal leaders up at night.

Ottawa began its search for a new general manager of planning at the end of 2022, but failed to find a good fit in its first national search. Now it's trying again.

Between scouting efforts, the city shook up its bureaucracy with a new strategic initiative department that's meant to relieve some of the pressure heaped on planning chiefs from higher levels of government.

But with Toronto and Hamilton embarking on their own searches, experts say competition will be stiff — and the pressure on interim chiefs nearly unbearable.

The chief planner bears the weight of meeting mandated growth targets while ensuring a sustainable approach.

That has meant tense and time-consuming negotiations with both provincial and federal governments, along with a proposed major overhaul to the rules that govern development.

"It's such an important position right now when you think about mandates from the province around local governments needing to do their part and building more homes," explained Stacy Hushion, vice-president of consultancy firm StrategyCorp's government relations and management consulting division.

"But at the same time, there's a limited pool of talent."

Wendy Stephanson, Ottawa's city manager, is keenly aware of that challenge and said municipalities and private companies share the same pressures.

"It's everywhere," she told reporters earlier this year. "Everybody has to look at how they're recruiting."

Freed from the need to lead strategic negotiations, Ottawa's newly reshaped planning department is now "laser focused" on traditional city building, Stephanson said.

The city's planners have not only faced intense public scrutiny on major developments, including a subdivision planned far from the urban boundary and the second phase of the struggling Lansdowne Park public-private partnership, but must also navigate a constantly shifting policy environment.

Stephanson describes an environment where housing directives change almost weekly — or what Lindsay Jones, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario's director of policy and government relations, calls a "perfect storm."

It "says a lot" that Ottawa and other cities have had to reorganize departments to meet external demands, she said.

"It's been really a combination of these long-term, long-standing structural issues that are the result of downloading in the 1990s, but then combined with the incredible growth pressures that municipalities are now being asked to support," Jones explained.

Ottawa-based housing policy researcher Carolyn Whitzman likewise said it's "a very confusing landscape" for planners, particularly in smaller municipalities.
As for how interim chief planners can navigate this "era of rapid change," Whitzman argued "it's almost impossible."

With the city adjusting to wave after wave of provincial legislation, managers have long been bracing for another major shift: the "grey tsunami."

Retirements have forced substantial change, with Ottawa seeing a rapid and ongoing turnover in upper management. Hushion doesn't see that changing.

"[Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System] data shows that tens of thousands of municipal employees are on track to retire anywhere between this year, over the next three years," she said.

Many are now poaching from other municipalities, added David Arbuckle, who heads the Association of Municipal Managers, Clerks and Treasurers of Ontario.

They agree the shift will require two things: a new and more flexible approach to recruitment, and a plan to better support staff with the chops to become future leaders.

While the public service was one thought of as a career for "lifers," Arbuckle said a generational shift has changed the long-term outlook of staff. So has an increasingly toxic discourse that's seen people move from attacking politicians to targeting the rank and file.

"Sometimes there's a blurring of the line between those roles. And then we've also seen a decline in civil discourse, more confrontation, more hostility towards municipal staff, primarily from the public," he said.

"That has really caused current staff to question their role. Is that something they want to be a part of?"

Hushion, who leads an annual survey of chief administrative officers across Ontario, said municipal staff worked diligently throughout the pandemic to ensure lights stayed on, garbage was picked up and toilets flushed, and "that took a toll."

While municipalities have been considered "notoriously slow to change," Hushion said there has been an acknowledgement that there needs to be creative solutions to retain people long thought of as "lifers."

She said staff need to target areas that contribute to burnout, including the "fishbowl" atmosphere and need for flexible working conditions, along with providing competitive salaries.

The city's efforts to break down silos between departments will expose staff to more program areas and help retain institutional knowledge, said Stephanson.

"Somebody else can move into another role, learn and grow specifically around the strategic projects area," she explained. "You might go off to a new job because you've got new tools in your toolkit, or you might go back to your old job, bring those things with you."

The experiment is already showing signs of progress, with the interim chief of the new strategic initiatives department, Ryan Perrault, set to take over for the retiring general manager of emergency services.

Stephanson said the focus is on stabilizing the reshuffled departments, with the recruitment process for a new planning chief set to continue through the fall.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/ot...-search-for-next-chief-planner-1.7265129
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Business, Politics & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:32 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.