Quote:
Originally Posted by Williamoforange
I go after Brockington, devine, Johnston, Kavanaugh/Cullen as well as other suburban councillors when they oppose density, there are just less projects out that way. The far flung suburban/rural councillors also don't normally run on platforms calling for intensification and oppose suburban sprawl, while then opposing intensification, such as menard/Leiper and other Urban councillors.
|
So your list only includes progressive Councillors. How about Tierney, who's so passionate about housing until he gets his colleagues to vote against a tower project at Blair and Montreal? Or Dudas who killed road improvements at Convent Glen Station because it would slow down cars? Or Luloff who delayed an affordable housing project in Orleans because of parking?
And in your book, it's ok to be against intensification in your own neighbourhood, as long as your transparent about it and vote in favour of projects within the Greenbelt, literal NIMBYism? But it's not ok for urban Councillors to work with a developer to make a project a little bit smaller to make it more palatable to the people who elected them?
Your positions seem to be more partisan than anything.
Threaded Mode