HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #11801  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2024, 8:06 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Half-Axed View Post
ODM - I have certainly never felt personally attacked or offended by you, and I never said that I did. You seem like a decent fellow (except with your sort of churlish and melodramatic mischaracterizations of the complaint I made here and here after wading through several pages of the usual off-topic squabbling and name-calling.)

I was simply supporting others in saying why several former regulars don’t like to participate here anymore, and I did not name names. Those who took that so very, very, very personally might want to ask themselves why.)

The only thing I had to say to you after you responded was that you have a tendency to go on and on and on debating a topic for several pages, writing lengthy essays in each comment…and then complaining that you don’t like debates that go on and on forever, seemingly with no self-awareness that you are the common denominator in pretty much every one of them in this forum. You just don’t let things go and anyone who wants to catch up with the actual topic at hand, here has the weed through pages of pages of that stuff.

This very thread is a case in point. You two are STILL writing at length about a dustup that happened FIVE DAYS AGO - I guess the truth really does hurt - again with seemingly no awareness that here you are yet again, dragging something out forever.

You gotta let people have their opinions sometimes. You can’t always beat them out of it by wearing them down with more and more explanation and repetition. As you keep saying yourself, not everything has to be a long drawn out debate. Take your own advice.

Or as they say, “be the change you want to see in the world.”
Thanks for the critique and the explanation. There are others, including one of the posters you follow, who draw things out as well, but that’s fine - it keeps things interesting. I’m glad at least that you were paying attention.

You have convinced me, a little to my surprise, that Keith was completely right in this case, and I have decided to ‘not worry about it’. No changes required. Don’t read my comments if you don’t like them.

I hope you don’t delete your account, as I’m sure you have much to contribute (sorry, I can’t recall any of your posts without doing a search). However just like the others, it’s your decision.

Thanks again for helping me out. I too am done with this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11802  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2024, 12:26 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDartmouthMark View Post
It was a little bizarre and unexpected for me.

To be clear, I don’t feel I’ve done anything wrong, just reconsidering how I read the room (I think if I had broken SSP rules, the mods would have stepped in). It seems like there’s an underlying anger towards anybody over 50-ish who doesn’t completely buy into today’s flavour of urbanism (or urban planning ideals), and perhaps just being older is enough. I say today’s flavour because most of us over 50 have seen urban planning ideals change many times over the years, and have no reason to believe that today’s ideals are the be all and end all - they too will eventually evolve into something else.
I think this sums things up quite well. I have seen the ageism rear its ugly head not just here but also elsewhere and it is quite puzzling. There seems to be a great deal of resentment among some that society has unfortunately changed in recent times. The only thing that had to do with the older generation is that some, not all, of the oldsters made the same mistake as the rest of society by voting in certain political leaders who are responsible for a lot of what happened after that. Having never supported such leaders I feel no personal responsibility for it but can appreciate the frustration they now feel that they have been rooked. I do not like using the terms "snowflakes" or "hypersensitive" but those seem to describe the reactions.

Then you have the ever-changing flavors of planning theory. As I have said many times, previous generations of planners gave us the theories and rules that led us to the built form we now have which the current gen tries to discredit and criticize. I have little doubt that future gens will do the same with the built form we are now seeing emerge and will say "what were they thinking?" when that in turn gets discredited and ripped out. This last point really seems to get the young planners worked up, since they seldom make the connection that none of these theories are absolutes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11803  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2024, 3:44 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,381
Well stated, Keith.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11804  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2024, 6:57 PM
LikesBikes's Avatar
LikesBikes LikesBikes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Halifax
Posts: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
I think this sums things up quite well. I have seen the ageism rear its ugly head not just here but also elsewhere and it is quite puzzling. There seems to be a great deal of resentment among some that society has unfortunately changed in recent times. The only thing that had to do with the older generation is that some, not all, of the oldsters made the same mistake as the rest of society by voting in certain political leaders who are responsible for a lot of what happened after that. Having never supported such leaders I feel no personal responsibility for it but can appreciate the frustration they now feel that they have been rooked. I do not like using the terms "snowflakes" or "hypersensitive" but those seem to describe the reactions.

Then you have the ever-changing flavors of planning theory. As I have said many times, previous generations of planners gave us the theories and rules that led us to the built form we now have which the current gen tries to discredit and criticize. I have little doubt that future gens will do the same with the built form we are now seeing emerge and will say "what were they thinking?" when that in turn gets discredited and ripped out. This last point really seems to get the young planners worked up, since they seldom make the connection that none of these theories are absolutes.
In your first paragraph you complain about ageism against older people and then in your second one complain about "young planners". This kind of double standard is what bugs a lot of people - you're allowed to complain about the discourse on here and get annoyed at people who disagree with you but when someone else says the same thing they're just "snowflakes" or "hypersensitive".

Either way, how many days have you been talking about this? Let's move on guys...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11805  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2024, 11:10 PM
Empire's Avatar
Empire Empire is offline
Salty Town
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halifax
Posts: 2,200
Was there this much carnage before the bumpout was insatlled?
https://www.saltwire.com/nova-scotia/new...s-a-contentious-issue-in-halifax-262913/

2018

Saltwire
Safety of curb ‘bump-outs’ a contentious issue in Halifax
An SUV flipped onto its roof when it collided with a van last week at the intersection of Ochterloney and Wentworth streets in Dartmouth. The incident occurred two days after barriers were put in place at the intersection for the curb bump-out pilot.
has been blamed by some for a dangerous two-vehicle crash last week.
“Correlation is not causation,” said Coun. Sam Austin, who represents the Dartmouth area that encompasses the intersection of Ochterloney and Wentworth streets where the collision took place.

“The bump-out we’re doing there is not unsual. They’ve been used all over the world. I talked to the police and I’ve talked to our traffic engineers after that happened because you want to make sure that it is not something that we have caused here. There is no conclusion from either the police nor our traffic engineers that these (cement barriers) have to be taken out. They have one vehicle pulling out when it shouldn’t have.”
A van and a sport utility vehicle collided in the intersection and the SUV ended up on its roof in front of the Two If By Sea cafe on Ochterloney. A few metres northwest along Ochterloney, the van came to rest with its front bumper ripped off. The van was not far from the four cement Jersey barriers that extended onto the streets at the corner of Ochterloney and Wentworth.
“It’s very much the same accident that has occurred several times at King and Ochterloney, just a block down,” Austin said. “Sightlines can be challengiing on that street, very much the sort of things we are looking to address with our projects.”
A Dartmouth woman said the temporary barrier projects are unsafe.
“It’s because it makes it a shorter walk for pedestrians to walk across the street,” she said of a stated objectives for the barriers. “If it is a pedestrian issue, why don’t they put up a (warning) light. All our streets are too narrow to have curb bumps. ... There is so much traffic here. We all think down there that curb bumps are not the answer. We’d like those things removed.”
The woman said she had been walking in the area shortly before Thursday’s collision.
“I don’t know if that caused the accident but they (barriers) are a danger,” she said. “There is no warning sign that those barriers are there. There are no signs. When it gets slippery, and somebody is coming up there, they are going to be hit. I walked on that sidewalk 25 minutes before that accident on that street. Anyone walking on that street, that sidewalk, could have been killed with that car flipping.”
The resident said the municipality seems pretty set on doing things like extending sidewalks at street corners.
“The end goal is to have people slow down but they are going to cause more disaster than not because cars will rush around them anyway.”
Austin, the regional councillor for Dartmouth Centre, said the curb bump-outs serve a couple of purposes.
“The idea of the sidewalk extension is that if the street is narrow, then traffic tends to go slower,” Austin said.
He said the main objective realized by curb bump-outs is to make pedestrians safer.
“It makes them more visible because the place they have to wait (to cross the street) is further out and it shortens the distance that they have to cross. It reduces the time they have to spend exposed to traffic in the streets.”
Austin said the municipality is calling it a pilot but the concept is anything but unusual.
“This isn’t a revolutionary idea. It’s new to us in dowtown Dartmouth on Ochterloney. But it’s a kind of a basic tool of traffic engineers. We are using Jersey barriers. You can test out how a different configuration of the street really works before you actually commit to anything in concrete.”
Austin pointed to similar configurations on Argyle Street where it intersects Sackville and Prince streets, and on Portland Street in Dartmouth, where bricked curb extensions are sporadically adorned with flower boxes. He said there have been no issues on those streets.
Austin said the barriers block off approximately the space of a car on both the Ochterloney and Wentworth sides of the corner.
“It’s an improvement if you consider usually what was sitting in that spot was an illegally parked car,” he said. “Instead of a vehicle sitting there that you can’t see around, you’ve got a shorter Jersey barrier that you can see over top of.”
Austin said the Ochterloney-Wenworth barriers are merely a test. They will probably be extended into the spring because they do not seem to pose much of a snow-removal problem. Similar bump-outs could be added at other Ochterloney intersections, he said.
__________________
Salty Town
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11806  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2024, 11:38 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,842
Sam in full deny and deflect mode despite the evidence being right in front of his nose. He deserves to lose the election based upon his incessant use of Dartmouth streets as his personal road engineer sandbox.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11807  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2024, 12:35 PM
Empire's Avatar
Empire Empire is offline
Salty Town
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halifax
Posts: 2,200
Austin said"

“It’s an improvement if you consider usually what was sitting in that spot was an illegally parked car,” he said. “Instead of a vehicle sitting there that you can’t see around, you’ve got a shorter Jersey barrier that you can see over top of.”

I have heard this a number of times and I don't agree with the premise. If a car is parked illegally “too close to the corner” you will see it (5ft. high). The car doesn’t block visibility completely and this would only apply when looking left at an intersection. If there is no parked car there and a bumpout is present (6” high) you may not see it under ideal conditions and the chances of seeing it if visibility is reduced by night, rain, fog or bumper to bumper traffic are greatly diminished. If there is snow cover the chance of seeing a bumpout is zero.


Here is a typical intersection in Copenhagen. Clearly marked crosswalks and bike lanes. Notice how the right turn painted line arcs with the turn of a vehicle and the vehicle is not forced into the oncoming lane. The painted line leads into a curb for the bike lane when it is safe to do so. This design makes a lot of sense to me especially with very narrow streets as we have in HRM.
Copenhagen: Google
https://www.google.ca/maps/@55.6704489,1...!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205409&entry=ttu
__________________
Salty Town

Last edited by Empire; Jun 14, 2024 at 1:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11808  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2024, 7:57 PM
JET JET is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by Empire View Post
Austin said"

“It’s an improvement if you consider usually what was sitting in that spot was an illegally parked car,” he said. “Instead of a vehicle sitting there that you can’t see around, you’ve got a shorter Jersey barrier that you can see over top of.”

I have heard this a number of times and I don't agree with the premise. If a car is parked illegally “too close to the corner” you will see it (5ft. high). The car doesn’t block visibility completely and this would only apply when looking left at an intersection. If there is no parked car there and a bumpout is present (6” high) you may not see it under ideal conditions and the chances of seeing it if visibility is reduced by night, rain, fog or bumper to bumper traffic are greatly diminished. If there is snow cover the chance of seeing a bumpout is zero.


Here is a typical intersection in Copenhagen. Clearly marked crosswalks and bike lanes. Notice how the right turn painted line arcs with the turn of a vehicle and the vehicle is not forced into the oncoming lane. The painted line leads into a curb for the bike lane when it is safe to do so. This design makes a lot of sense to me especially with very narrow streets as we have in HRM.
Copenhagen: Google
https://www.google.ca/maps/@55.6704489,1...!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205409&entry=ttu
I think the bump outs are safer. It is where I cross the street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11809  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2024, 11:56 PM
Saul Goode Saul Goode is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by JET View Post
I think the bump outs are safer. It is where I cross the street.
I've crossed the street there for more than five decades, including about 25 years commuting to work in Halifax by foot and by ferry. The greatest threat to my safety on that walk downtown was the risk I'd be distracted by the smell of fresh-baked croissants at TIBS and walk into another pedestrian.

I find the notion that that intersection is somehow "safer" now to be simply untenable, if not downright amusing.

Different strokes, I guess.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11810  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2024, 1:29 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Goode View Post
I find the notion that that intersection is somehow "safer" now to be simply untenable, if not downright amusing.

Different strokes, I guess.
It cannot be made safer if the incident rate is already zero.

The HRM traffic planners in general and Austin in particular always raise the twin boogeymen of speed and traffic as the rationale for their incessant tinkering and spending on measures to make life worse on the roads of HRM. But in the majority of cases, not only are those not a problem, they can't even be bothered to collect stats on them before narrowing intersections and installing speed bumps and curb extensions. It is seldom a statistically-driven exercise. Instead it is just the mindset that they need to do whatever they can to make getting around more difficult. It needs to stop.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11811  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2024, 2:10 PM
Empire's Avatar
Empire Empire is offline
Salty Town
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halifax
Posts: 2,200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
It cannot be made safer if the incident rate is already zero.

The HRM traffic planners in general and Austin in particular always raise the twin boogeymen of speed and traffic as the rationale for their incessant tinkering and spending on measures to make life worse on the roads of HRM. But in the majority of cases, not only are those not a problem, they can't even be bothered to collect stats on them before narrowing intersections and installing speed bumps and curb extensions. It is seldom a statistically-driven exercise. Instead it is just the mindset that they need to do whatever they can to make getting around more difficult. It needs to stop.
Great point! I would like to see stats for incidents for all of the areas where installations of bumpouts and speed bumps have occured. Meanwhile, intersections where there have been recorded incidents have poor maintenance in terms of painted markings etc. Also, an extreme danger that continues to be ignored is pothole elimination. There is no plausable excuse for the existance of a single pothole.

A sad irony is to see a massive speed table being installed 15 feet from a large pothole that doesn't get patched. HRM at its best.
__________________
Salty Town
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11812  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2024, 2:40 PM
JET JET is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Goode View Post
I've crossed the street there for more than five decades, including about 25 years commuting to work in Halifax by foot and by ferry. The greatest threat to my safety on that walk downtown was the risk I'd be distracted by the smell of fresh-baked croissants at TIBS and walk into another pedestrian.

I find the notion that that intersection is somehow "safer" now to be simply untenable, if not downright amusing.

Different strokes, I guess.
Tibs is a distraction, and a block away the meat pies at the lighted crosswalk.

My preferred spot to cross Ochterloney is at Victoria, one way street, and good view planes, once I step out to the bump out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11813  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2024, 2:57 PM
JET JET is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
It cannot be made safer if the incident rate is already zero.

The HRM traffic planners in general and Austin in particular always raise the twin boogeymen of speed and traffic as the rationale for their incessant tinkering and spending on measures to make life worse on the roads of HRM. But in the majority of cases, not only are those not a problem, they can't even be bothered to collect stats on them before narrowing intersections and installing speed bumps and curb extensions. It is seldom a statistically-driven exercise. Instead it is just the mindset that they need to do whatever they can to make getting around more difficult. It needs to stop.
It depends on the definition of incident. Does it only include where a car hits something, or does it include near misses where I was almost flattened by a car or bike while in a crosswalk?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11814  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2024, 3:36 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: B3K Halifax, NS
Posts: 9,934
Does anyone know what is going on at 1549 Lower Water Street? A blasting permit was just submitted for a new residential building. This is currently home to Waterfront Warehouse which is still operating!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11815  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2024, 3:57 PM
teddifax's Avatar
teddifax teddifax is online now
Halifax Promoter!
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,113
Waterfront Warehouse is Prime Real Estate! I have been there twice over the years and both times were extremely unimpressive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11816  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2024, 5:38 PM
Saul Goode Saul Goode is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dmajackson View Post
Does anyone know what is going on at 1549 Lower Water Street? A blasting permit was just submitted for a new residential building. This is currently home to Waterfront Warehouse which is still operating!
Well, their menu could use a good shake-up!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11817  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2024, 8:03 PM
RoshanMcG RoshanMcG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Halifax
Posts: 558
Unsure if there is a thread for this, but this is the development at the corner of Maitland and Portland Place, across from the Seahorse:



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11818  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2024, 10:02 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Goode View Post
Well, their menu could use a good shake-up!
That place has not been good for 25 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11819  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2024, 1:18 AM
Saul Goode Saul Goode is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
That place has not been good for 25 years.
True. But I was really just riffing on the blasting theme.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11820  
Old Posted Jun 16, 2024, 12:28 PM
Summerville Summerville is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 248
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoshanMcG View Post
Unsure if there is a thread for this, but this is the development at the corner of Maitland and Portland Place, across from the Seahorse:




One if the first big affordable housing projects,…puts it into perspective of how long it will be before we will be able to effectively deal with the housing crisis.

I guess the other way is to add lots of supply but there is no guarantee that landlords of older stock will ever be under pressure to charge lesser rent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:19 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.