Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad
The international FUA seems very similar to the American CSA in terms of definition. The Canadian CMA appears to be the outlier.
Perhaps Canada should update their practices, although, by using FUA rather than CMA, it would make it impossible to measure statistical changes over time. You would be starting at day one all over again.
|
It would be a little more expensive, but probably their best plan would be to do dual stats, release CMA stats and FUA stats, at least for a few cycles so recent historical trends can be maintained. But the underlying data is basically all available, coming from the same place, it's just packaging slightly differently.
I pointed out in the main thread that we might be getting to the point where we need a tier above CMA to account for how our megalopolis's like Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal, are butting up to their satellite CMAs; FUAs could be that 'higher' tier.
Threaded Mode