HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #221  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2023, 11:36 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,174
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcj View Post
Are you suggesting a separate agency that'll govern local transit in the Fraser Valley? or a regional transit service?
Whichever works. Technically both jobs are BC Transit's jurisdiction, but they're evidently not interested in making Abbotsford or Chilliwack more transit-friendly, so it might be better to split the Valley off into a separate TA (or let Abby have its own TA entirely), just like how GVTA/TransLink was split from BC Transit back in the late Nineties. Victoria should probably have its own TA too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #222  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2023, 9:01 PM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,595
Somewhat back on track - Concerns growing about long-term residents at Abbotsford rest stop

Quote:
Concerns are growing about the number of unhoused people at a private lot in Abbotsford, where several tents, trailers and recreational vehicles seem to be stationed long-term.

Mayor Ross Siemens said the “intended use” of the Bradner rest area off the Trans-Canada Highway is temporary repose for truckers and tourists, and the area is not equipped for longer stays.

...

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure reiterated that while overnight rest is permitted on public highway rest areas, longer-term stays are not.

“The Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure is aware of people using some public highway rest areas for longer-term camping,” it wrote in an emailed statement. It “continues to work with Ministry of Housing through their outreach program and with local enforcement to keep the Bradner Rest Area a safe place to temporarily stop and use the facilities.”

The Bradner rest area is slated for upgrades as part of proposed improvements to the Trans-Canada Highway corridor between 264th Street and Highway 11, it added.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #223  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2023, 2:47 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba View Post
Yeah, I've seen the same thing at the Hunter Creek rest area just this side of Hope. I don't have a problem when it's a few people who keep a low profile, but like anything else it can get out of hand if too many try to take advantage of it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #225  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2023, 5:09 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,205
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #226  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2023, 6:27 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,408
This bad boy can fit so many lanes under it! <slaps on girder>
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #227  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2023, 5:50 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,205
Infrastructure BC'S fall brochure has construction starting early next year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #228  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2023, 1:05 PM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,205
Early works to start next year, full completion in 2029.

https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2023MOTI0188-001854
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #229  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2023, 12:23 AM
flipper316 flipper316 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 887
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #230  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2023, 2:32 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,205
Different project mate. That might be obvious if you posted more than just a link.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #231  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2023, 7:43 AM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
Different project mate. That might be obvious if you posted more than just a link.
This is the "Highway 1 Improvements, 216th to 264th" thread, is it not? 'Cause that's exactly what the linked article is about.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #232  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2023, 10:28 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
Different project mate. That might be obvious if you posted more than just a link.
How many different projects are there to widen Highway 1 between 216th and 264th??? There's the one in this article, there's another one according to you... maybe that's the problem, there are competing projects and they're just getting in each others way!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #233  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2023, 10:40 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 18,019
Phase 3A and 3B out to highway 11 are technically different projects, but it’s all a continuous highway expansion of the #1, so essentially the same project.

The new 264 interchange design looks great and will definitely be the centerpiece of this project.

I’m just curious as to how the transition will work at 216th with the bus shoulder lanes.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #234  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2023, 11:12 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,690
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
I’m just curious as to how the transition will work at 216th with the bus shoulder lanes.
216th eastbound is very awkward today. There are 2 quick merges in a row to account for vehicles entering the highway and then the lane reduction. All this on a hill around a corner. I'm surprised we don't see more accidents there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #235  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2023, 1:24 PM
M00dy M00dy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Phase 3A and 3B out to highway 11 are technically different projects, but it’s all a continuous highway expansion of the #1, so essentially the same project.

The new 264 interchange design looks great and will definitely be the centerpiece of this project.

I’m just curious as to how the transition will work at 216th with the bus shoulder lanes.
Got a link to a design? I'd be interested to see it. (Sorry if I missed it in the thread)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #236  
Old Posted Dec 6, 2023, 10:44 PM
Tvisforme's Avatar
Tvisforme Tvisforme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 2,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by M00dy View Post
Got a link to a design? I'd be interested to see it. (Sorry if I missed it in the thread)
I don't know if this is the final design, but there is a diagram of the 264th Street Interchange on page 9 (PDF page 11) of the 2023 Discussion Guide:

DISCUSSION GUIDE – 2023 from 264th Street to Highway 11 Interchange (PDF)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #237  
Old Posted Dec 7, 2023, 5:23 PM
M00dy M00dy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 136
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvisforme View Post
I don't know if this is the final design, but there is a diagram of the 264th Street Interchange on page 9 (PDF page 11) of the 2023 Discussion Guide:

DISCUSSION GUIDE – 2023 from 264th Street to Highway 11 Interchange (PDF)
Thanks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #238  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2024, 10:23 PM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is online now
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,413
Is there a reason they are not adding any additional general purpose lanes (currently 2 each direction - unchanged after expansion) ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #239  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2024, 12:05 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,205
The traffic demand doesn't warrant a third general purpose lane here, it's a very rural stretch with mostly through traffic until the highway reaches Abbotsford. More lanes would only serve to encourage car centric urban sprawl which isn't part of the region's urban planning.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #240  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2024, 1:26 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 18,019
While I think that the new HOV Lane should be general purpose during non rush hours, the highway will also have considerably long climbing lanes and a legitimate bus shoulder lane too (not like the joke on the 99) so it is more than just adding an HOV lane.

Also the main issue with this stretch of highway has been the old accident prone interchanges which are getting completely re-built.

So, as I stated before this is overall a decent upgrade. A 7/10. For reference the Port Mann bridge / highway upgrade was a 9/10 and the SFPR was a 5/10.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:26 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.